Jeden Skill in Manus ausführen
mit einem Klick

Jeden Skill in Manus mit einem Klick ausführen

Loslegen

convergence-paper-overview

Sterne378

Forks27

Aktualisiert16. Juni 2026 um 12:51

Paper landscape scan at abstract level — discover MCDA, voting theory, Delphi, and optimization methodology papers.

Installation

Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.

In Manus ausführen

Quelle

yogsoth-ai

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

GitHub-Repository öffnen Creator-Repositorys ansehen

Download

In Manus ausführen

Verwandte BerufeSOC

Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation

UnternehmensberaterWirtschafts- und Finanzberufe·SOC 13-1111

SKILL.md

readonly

name	convergence-paper-overview
description	Paper landscape scan at abstract level — discover MCDA, voting theory, Delphi, and optimization methodology papers.
execution	import
source	skills/literature-overview/SKILL.md
dependencies	{"sops":["literature-overview"]}

Paper Overview

Import SOP. Execution delegated to literature-engine/paper-overview.

See source repo for full SKILL.md and prompt.md.

Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

SOP	When to use
literature-overview	Quick landscape scan — discover papers on a topic without full-text reading

Mehr aus diesem Repository

gleiches Repository

isomorphism-falsification

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Strategy: Attack an isomorphism claim by demanding an explicit structure-preserving map and trying to break it. Targets any multi-language claim of the form 'X ≅ Y ≅ … across N mathematical languages'. Forces the claim to either earn the word 'isomorphism' or be demoted to 'analogy'. Methods: category theory (functor/natural-iso criteria), model theory, Lakatos monster-barring.

2026-06-21378

adversarial-debate-truthseeking

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.

2026-06-21378

circular-validation-audit

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Strategy: Run BEFORE building any validator (sandbox/simulation/benchmark). Builds a non-circularity matrix of theory-claim × validator-assumption to detect when a validator would 'confirm' a theory only because it was built on the theory's own premises. A circular validator's PASS carries zero evidential weight. Methods: Cartwright nomological machines, Winsberg sanctioning-of-simulations, tautology detection.

2026-06-21378

elegance-trap-probe

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Strategy: Attack a beautiful unified result on the suspicion that its beauty is the bug. Distinguishes EARNED simplicity (forbids/predicts/subsumes) from DECORATIVE simplicity (re-describes/relabels/accommodates). Directly serves the Occam aesthetic by making it a falsifiable bar, not a vibe. Methods: Sober parsimony-as-evidence, MDL, Meehl risky prediction, accommodation-vs-prediction.

2026-06-21378

falsification-first-stress-test

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Campaign: Truth-seeking adversarial validation for scientific research artifacts (NOT publication defense). Core question: Where have we fooled ourselves, and is each load-bearing claim even falsifiable? Win-condition is INVERTED from survival/resilience to active refutation. Methods: Popper falsificationism, Lakatos Proofs and Refutations, Mayo severe testing, Platt strong inference.

2026-06-21378

independent-convergence-audit

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Strategy: Attack the evidential weight of an 'independent convergence' claim. When N reasoning paths all reach the same conclusion, the confidence boost is real only if the paths were actually independent. Measures shared-prior / shared-blindspot contamination and corrects the over-counted confidence. Methods: Bayesian agreement-as-evidence, correlated-error analysis, jury theorem assumptions.

2026-06-21378