risk-management

Sterne1

Forks0

Aktualisiert20. März 2026 um 14:19

Risk management rules learned from competition outcomes. Use when sizing positions or setting stop-losses.

Installation

Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.

Quelle

zinan92

zinan92/copilot

GitHub-Repository öffnen Creator-Repositorys ansehen

Download

Verwandte BerufeSOC

Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation

Finanz- und InvestitionsanalystenWirtschafts- und Finanzberufe·SOC 13-2051

Datei-Explorer

3 Dateien

SKILL.md

readonly

name	risk-management
description	Risk management rules learned from competition outcomes. Use when sizing positions or setting stop-losses.
platform	openclaw
scope	global

Risk Management

Last updated: 2026-01-17 20:31 UTC Active patterns: 40 Total samples: 13385 Confidence threshold: 60%

Core Principles

These rules are derived from analyzing profitable vs losing trades:

Rule	Success Rate	Samples	Confidence	Seen
Trade count inversely correlates with pe...	95%	861	55%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	95%	950	95%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	92%	157	65%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	92%	164	70%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	92%	895	95%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	92%	855	95%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	92%	328	79%	2x
Optimal trade frequency in trending bull...	90%	543	75%	1x
Optimal trade frequency in trending bull...	88%	1088	79%	2x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	88%	184	75%	1x
Close short positions immediately when m...	88%	675	95%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	88%	368	79%	2x
High confidence (>0.8) should require co...	85%	20	50%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	85%	182	65%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	85%	321	70%	1x
Diversify across multiple assets (BTC, E...	85%	494	79%	2x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	85%	100	95%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	85%	368	95%	1x
Optimal trade frequency in trending mark...	82%	535	65%	1x
Diversify across multiple assets (BTC, E...	82%	348	70%	1x
Close positions near breakeven to free m...	82%	390	79%	2x
Explicit validation step before trade ex...	80%	100	95%	1x
Close positions near breakeven to free m...	80%	144	95%	1x
Diversify across assets rather than conc...	78%	248	65%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	78%	125	75%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	78%	507	95%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	75%	160	95%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	74%	285	99%	2x
Close positions near breakeven to free m...	73%	278	99%	2x
High confidence (>0.8) should require co...	70%	20	40%	1x
Position sizing at 2% risk with 2:1 rewa...	65%	139	45%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	65%	121	65%	1x
Explicit validation step ('Validate_trad...	65%	176	95%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	60%	189	95%	1x
Explicit validation step before trade ex...	45%	182	95%	1x
Position sizing at 2% equity risk with 2...	35%	191	95%	1x
2% equity risk with 2:1 reward ratio fai...	35%	173	95%	1x
Explicit validation step ('Validate_trad...	35%	195	95%	1x
Position sizing at 2% equity risk with 2...	30%	171	95%	1x
Position sizing at 2% risk with 2:1 rewa...	15%	155	55%	1x

Top Risk Rules

Trade count inversely correlates with performance in flat markets: 3-6 trades = ~$0 PnL, 70-180 trades = -$55 to -$141, 150-225 trades = -$325 to -$581

Success rate: 95%
Based on 861 observations
Confidence: 55% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-13

Trade frequency should adapt to market regime: mixed/choppy markets require 0-10 trades/24h maximum. 201 trades = -$360.24, 2 trades = -$0.29, 0 trades = $0.00.

Success rate: 95%
Based on 950 observations
Confidence: 95% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-17

Validate risk per trade explicitly before entry. skill_aware_oss reasoning includes 'risk per trade within limits' and 'portfolio risk is within limits' - this validation step correlates with +$1349 PnL.

Success rate: 92%
Based on 157 observations
Confidence: 65% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-14

Validate risk per trade explicitly before entry with 2% equity risk and 2:1 reward ratio. skill_aware_oss reasoning includes 'risk/reward is 2:1 with 2% equity risk' and 'trade validation passed', achieving best performance (+$1379.66).

Success rate: 92%
Based on 164 observations
Confidence: 70% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-14

Trade frequency should adapt to market regime: moderate bull markets require 0-30 trades/24h maximum. Above 100 trades correlates with losses (-$50 to -$264).

Success rate: 92%
Based on 895 observations
Confidence: 95% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-17

General Guidelines

Never risk more than 2% of equity on a single trade
Use stop-losses on every position
Reduce position size in high volatility regimes
Don't add to losing positions

Confidence Guide

Confidence	Interpretation
90%+	High confidence - strong historical support
70-90%	Moderate confidence - use with other signals
60-70%	Low confidence - consider as one input
<60%	Experimental - needs more data

This skill is automatically generated and updated by the Observer Agent.

Mehr aus diesem Repository

gleiches Repository

btc-bottom-model

zinan92/copilot

比特币抄底时机判断模型。通过追踪6大核心指标（RSI技术超跌、成交量萎缩、MVRV比率、社交媒体恐慌指数、矿机关机价、长期持有者行为）综合评估比特币是否进入抄底区间，输出抄底评级和建仓建议。当用户提到比特币抄底、BTC是否到底了、比特币超跌、MVRV、矿机关机价、长期持有者LTH、比特币恐慌指数、是否该买入比特币、BTC建仓时机、加密市场底部信号、比特币周期底部等话题时，务必使用此技能。即使用户只是笼统地问"现在能抄底比特币吗"或"BTC跌到位了没"，也应触发此技能来提供结构化的分析框架。

2026-03-201

canslim-screener

zinan92/copilot

Screen US stocks using William O'Neil's CANSLIM growth stock methodology. Use when user requests CANSLIM stock screening, growth stock analysis, momentum stock identification, or wants to find stocks with strong earnings and price momentum following O'Neil's investment system.

2026-03-201

economic-calendar-fetcher

zinan92/copilot

Fetch upcoming economic events and data releases using FMP API. Retrieve scheduled central bank decisions, employment reports, inflation data, GDP releases, and other market-moving economic indicators for specified date ranges (default: next 7 days). Output chronological markdown reports with impact assessment.

2026-03-201

ftd-detector

zinan92/copilot

Detects Follow-Through Day (FTD) signals for market bottom confirmation using William O'Neil's methodology. Dual-index tracking (S&P 500 + NASDAQ) with state machine for rally attempt, FTD qualification, and post-FTD health monitoring. Use when user asks about market bottom signals, follow-through days, rally attempts, re-entry timing after corrections, or whether it's safe to increase equity exposure. Complementary to market-top-detector (defensive) - this skill is offensive (bottom confirmation).

2026-03-201

macro-liquidity

zinan92/copilot

宏观流动性监控与风险预警系统。通过追踪4大核心指标（美联储净流动性、SOFR隔夜融资利率、MOVE美债波动率指数、日元套利交易信号）实时评估全球金融体系的流动性状态，输出流动性评级和风险应对建议。当用户提到流动性、美联储缩表、TGA账户、逆回购ON RRP、SOFR利率、MOVE指数、美债波动、日元套利carry trade、USDJPY与利差、缩表对市场影响、钱紧不紧、流动性拐点、金融条件收紧等话题时，务必使用此技能。即使用户只是笼统地问"现在流动性怎么样"或"美联储在抽水还是放水"，也应触发此技能来提供结构化的分析框架。

2026-03-201

macro-regime-detector

zinan92/copilot

Detect structural macro regime transitions (1-2 year horizon) using cross-asset ratio analysis. Analyze RSP/SPY concentration, yield curve, credit conditions, size factor, equity-bond relationship, and sector rotation to identify regime shifts between Concentration, Broadening, Contraction, Inflationary, and Transitional states. Run when user asks about macro regime, market regime change, structural rotation, or long-term market positioning.

2026-03-201

name	risk-management
description	Risk management rules learned from competition outcomes. Use when sizing positions or setting stop-losses.
platform	openclaw
scope	global

Risk Management

Last updated: 2026-01-17 20:31 UTC Active patterns: 40 Total samples: 13385 Confidence threshold: 60%

Core Principles

These rules are derived from analyzing profitable vs losing trades:

Rule	Success Rate	Samples	Confidence	Seen
Trade count inversely correlates with pe...	95%	861	55%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	95%	950	95%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	92%	157	65%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	92%	164	70%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	92%	895	95%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	92%	855	95%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	92%	328	79%	2x
Optimal trade frequency in trending bull...	90%	543	75%	1x
Optimal trade frequency in trending bull...	88%	1088	79%	2x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	88%	184	75%	1x
Close short positions immediately when m...	88%	675	95%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	88%	368	79%	2x
High confidence (>0.8) should require co...	85%	20	50%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	85%	182	65%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	85%	321	70%	1x
Diversify across multiple assets (BTC, E...	85%	494	79%	2x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	85%	100	95%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	85%	368	95%	1x
Optimal trade frequency in trending mark...	82%	535	65%	1x
Diversify across multiple assets (BTC, E...	82%	348	70%	1x
Close positions near breakeven to free m...	82%	390	79%	2x
Explicit validation step before trade ex...	80%	100	95%	1x
Close positions near breakeven to free m...	80%	144	95%	1x
Diversify across assets rather than conc...	78%	248	65%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	78%	125	75%	1x
Trade frequency should adapt to market r...	78%	507	95%	1x
Validate risk per trade explicitly befor...	75%	160	95%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	74%	285	99%	2x
Close positions near breakeven to free m...	73%	278	99%	2x
High confidence (>0.8) should require co...	70%	20	40%	1x
Position sizing at 2% risk with 2:1 rewa...	65%	139	45%	1x
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per ...	65%	121	65%	1x
Explicit validation step ('Validate_trad...	65%	176	95%	1x
Close losing positions proactively with ...	60%	189	95%	1x
Explicit validation step before trade ex...	45%	182	95%	1x
Position sizing at 2% equity risk with 2...	35%	191	95%	1x
2% equity risk with 2:1 reward ratio fai...	35%	173	95%	1x
Explicit validation step ('Validate_trad...	35%	195	95%	1x
Position sizing at 2% equity risk with 2...	30%	171	95%	1x
Position sizing at 2% risk with 2:1 rewa...	15%	155	55%	1x

Top Risk Rules

Trade count inversely correlates with performance in flat markets: 3-6 trades = ~$0 PnL, 70-180 trades = -$55 to -$141, 150-225 trades = -$325 to -$581

Success rate: 95%
Based on 861 observations
Confidence: 55% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-13

Trade frequency should adapt to market regime: mixed/choppy markets require 0-10 trades/24h maximum. 201 trades = -$360.24, 2 trades = -$0.29, 0 trades = $0.00.

Success rate: 95%
Based on 950 observations
Confidence: 95% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-17

Validate risk per trade explicitly before entry. skill_aware_oss reasoning includes 'risk per trade within limits' and 'portfolio risk is within limits' - this validation step correlates with +$1349 PnL.

Success rate: 92%
Based on 157 observations
Confidence: 65% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-14

Validate risk per trade explicitly before entry with 2% equity risk and 2:1 reward ratio. skill_aware_oss reasoning includes 'risk/reward is 2:1 with 2% equity risk' and 'trade validation passed', achieving best performance (+$1379.66).

Success rate: 92%
Based on 164 observations
Confidence: 70% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-14

Trade frequency should adapt to market regime: moderate bull markets require 0-30 trades/24h maximum. Above 100 trades correlates with losses (-$50 to -$264).

Success rate: 92%
Based on 895 observations
Confidence: 95% (seen 1 times)
First identified: 2026-01-17

General Guidelines

Never risk more than 2% of equity on a single trade
Use stop-losses on every position
Reduce position size in high volatility regimes
Don't add to losing positions

Confidence Guide

Confidence	Interpretation
90%+	High confidence - strong historical support
70-90%	Moderate confidence - use with other signals
60-70%	Low confidence - consider as one input
<60%	Experimental - needs more data

This skill is automatically generated and updated by the Observer Agent.