| name | diff-intake |
| description | Reads a PR or branch diff and produces a structured YAML change brief for downstream analytics instrumentation skills. Use this as the first step whenever a user shares a PR link, branch comparison, or raw diff and wants to understand what changed, what needs tracking, or how to instrument a feature. Trigger on phrases like "review this PR", "what changed in this branch", "help me instrument this diff", "check analytics coverage for this change", or any request to start the analytics review workflow.
|
diff-intake
Follow this skill step by step.
You are step 1 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. Produce a compact
YAML change brief that downstream skills (discover-event-surfaces,
instrument-events) will consume. Keep the output machine-readable and
precise — no prose around the YAML block.
Step 1: Gather changed files and categorize
Fetch the list of changed files from the source, then categorize each one.
Fetching changes
- PR URL
gh pr view <number-or-url>
gh pr view <pr-number> --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.path)\t+\(.additions) -\(.deletions)\t"'
- Branch comparison
git log <main|master>..<branch>
git diff --stat <main|master>..<branch>
- Ambiguous mention (PR number, branch name): infer the right form and fetch without asking unless auth fails.
Categorize files
Assign each file to a category based on its path:
- Core Logic: application source (e.g. src/auth/login.py, database/models.ts)
- Generated: anything with
generated in its path
- Testing: test files
- Config / Dependencies: package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.
- Documentation: READMEs, docs/
- Noise: lock-files, .svg, auto-generated migrations
For each file, record: path, category, change type (Added / Modified / Deleted), and analytics likelihood (1–5).
Step 2: Build the file summary map
Read every single Core Logic file and create the file summary map.
Only process and include Core Logic files.
Fetching detailed diffs
- PR
gh pr view <number-or-url> --json baseRefOid,headRefOid
Using the response, get a detailed diff
git diff <baseRefOid>...<headRefOid> -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>
- Branch comparison
git diff main..feature/foo -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>
For each file, record
summary — 2-line summary of what changed
stack — frontend, backend, or shared
Also derive user-facing changes and touched surfaces
While reading the diff and the changed files, also produce the higher-level
signals that downstream event discovery needs:
user_facing_changes — a flat list of concrete behavior changes that matter
to a user, PM, or analyst. Each item should describe what a user can now do,
see, or experience differently. Omit purely internal refactors.
surfaces.components — the UI components, routes, pages, handlers, or other
interaction surfaces directly involved in those user-facing changes. Prefer
likely instrumentation points over low-level helpers.
For each surface, record:
name — component, route, page, hook, or surface name
file — repo-relative path
change — added, modified, or deleted
If the change is backend-only or has no clear interactive surface, omit
surfaces.components rather than inventing one.
Step 3: Classify the overall change
Infer the change type and analytics scope:
| Type | Analytics implication |
|---|
| feat | High — new surfaces likely need tracking |
| fix | Low–Medium — may affect existing event conditions |
| refactor | Low — tracking paths may move, regression risk |
| perf | Low — usually no tracking impact |
| revert | Medium — need to check what tracking was lost |
| style / docs / test / build / ci / chore | None — skip analytics analysis |
analytics_scope = highest implication present:
none — only no-impact types
low — only perf/refactor
medium — fix
high — any feature or capability addition
If analytics_scope is none, emit the brief and note that downstream skills are not needed.
Step 4: Emit the YAML brief
Output only the YAML block — no prose before or after. Follow the format exactly.
List each file individually in file_summary_map (no globs).
change_brief:
classification:
primary: feat
types: [feat, fix]
analytics_scope: high
stack: frontend
summary: "One sentence describing the overall change"
user_facing_changes:
- "Users can now upload an avatar with drag-and-drop and preview it before saving."
surfaces:
components:
- name: "AvatarUpload"
file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
change: modified
file_summary_map:
- file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
summary: "New component for avatar upload with drag-and-drop and preview"
layer: frontend
- file: "src/api/upload.ts"
summary: "Upload endpoint handler, validates file type and persists to S3"
layer: backend