gaps-to-issues

name	gaps-to-issues
description	Create Linear issues from a PR audit doc — one issue per PR bucket with acceptance criteria and linked audit findings.
disable-model-invocation	false
user-invocable	true
argument-hint	[path-to-audit-doc]

Gaps to Issues

You take a PR audit document (produced by /pr-audit) and create Linear issues from its PR buckets.

This skill stops at issue creation. Use /spec-from-audit to generate specs for the created issues.

Input

$ARGUMENTS — Path to the audit document (e.g., docs/reviews/2026-03-23-branch-audit.md). If not provided, look for the most recently modified file in docs/reviews/.

Workflow

Step 1: Read the Audit Document

Read the audit doc. Verify it has:

• A "PR Buckets" section with at least one bucket
• Each bucket has: name, estimated LOC, findings, files, acceptance criteria

If the audit doc is missing buckets or acceptance criteria, tell the user and stop.

Step 2: Ask for Linear Context

Ask the user:

1. Which Linear team to create issues under (suggest the team from recent issues if detectable)
2. Which Linear project to add issues to (optional)
3. Whether to set priority per bucket or use a default
4. Whether to consolidate any buckets before creating issues

Wait for confirmation before proceeding.

Step 3: Create Issues

For each bucket, create a Linear issue using mcp__linear-server__save_issue:

• Title: Bucket name (concise, under 70 characters)
• Team: From Step 2
• Project: From Step 2 (if provided)
• Priority: Based on the highest severity finding in the bucket:
  • Contains Critical findings → Urgent (1)
  • Contains High findings → High (2)
  • Contains Medium findings → Medium (3)
  • Contains only Low findings → Low (4)
• Description: Keep it lightweight — the spec (created later by /spec-from-audit) is the source of truth. The issue body should contain:
  • One-sentence goal
  • List of finding IDs from the audit (e.g., "Covers findings #1, #3, #7")
  • Dependencies on other issues if any
  • A note: "See attached spec document for full implementation plan."
  • Do NOT duplicate scope, file lists, or acceptance criteria — that belongs in the spec
• Links: Add the PR URL if one exists

If the user asked to consolidate buckets, merge the relevant findings.

Step 4: Update the Audit Document

Add a "Follow-up Issues" section to the top of the audit doc (below the header metadata) with a table of all created issues:

## Follow-up Issues

| Issue | Priority | Title |
|-------|----------|-------|
| [SELF-NNNN](url) | Urgent | Bucket name |
| [SELF-NNNN](url) | High | Bucket name |

Update the audit doc status to: Audit complete — issues created

Step 5: Present Results

Show the user:

1. Table of created issues with IDs, priorities, and URLs
2. Any buckets that were skipped or consolidated
3. Remind them: "Use /spec-from-audit to generate specs for these issues."

Stop here. Do not create specs.

Important Notes

• Never run git commit or git push.
• Ask before creating — never create issues without user confirmation on team/project/priority.
• If a bucket seems too large (>2k LOC estimate), suggest splitting before creating.
• If buckets have dependencies between them, note this in the issue descriptions and use Linear's blockedBy field.
• Issue descriptions are set once at creation. After creating an issue, never use save_issue to overwrite its description. All follow-up context, corrections, or status updates go in comments via save_comment. Use save_issue only to change structured fields (status, priority, assignee, labels).