| name | tuist-swift-review |
| description | Project-specific PR-review rules for the tuist/tuist Swift codebase (cli). Focuses on the things only this repo knows — preferring value types, the testing framework choice, and migration of XCTest to Swift Testing. |
Tuist Swift Review
This skill is intentionally narrow. Generic Swift style, formatting,
naming, and lint hygiene are already covered by SwiftFormat / SwiftLint
in CI — do not flag those. Focus on the rules below.
For each finding, cite path:line and quote the relevant snippet.
1. Prefer structs over classes
Default to struct for new types. Reach for class only when reference
semantics, identity, inheritance, or deinit are actually required.
Flag
- A new
class declaration that has no stored mutable identity, no
inheritance, no deinit, and is not bridged to an Objective-C / Cocoa
API. Recommend converting it to a struct. Severity: medium.
Do not flag
- Existing classes left unchanged by the diff.
- Classes that subclass a framework type (
NSObject, XCTestCase,
Operation, etc.) or conform to a protocol that requires reference
semantics.
- Types that genuinely need reference identity (caches, long-lived
coordinators, actors-with-state-shared-by-reference).
final class declarations whose Sendable conformance is backed by
a stored Synchronization.Mutex<State> (or another ~Copyable
synchronization primitive). Mutex cannot be a stored property of a
Copyable struct — the compiler emits stored property '...' of 'Copyable'-conforming struct '...' has non-Copyable type 'Mutex<...>'
— and a ~Copyable struct cannot be captured by a @Sendable closure.
A final class with the Mutex and Sendable conformance is the
correct expression of this pattern.
2. Avoid @unchecked Sendable
@unchecked Sendable opts out of the compiler's concurrency safety
checks and shifts the burden of correctness onto every reader. Prefer
proper synchronization primitives that the compiler can verify.
Flag
Do not flag
- Existing
@unchecked Sendable conformances the diff does not touch.
- Types that bridge to a framework requirement the compiler genuinely
cannot reason about (e.g. wrapping a non-Sendable Objective-C class
whose thread-safety the author has verified). Require an explanatory
comment naming the invariant the author is asserting.
When suggesting Mutex, point at
cli/Sources/TuistAppleArchiver/AppleArchiver.swift for the in-tree
usage pattern: let state = Mutex(State()) plus
state.withLock { ... }.
3. Testing framework — Swift Testing, not XCTest
New tests must be written with Swift Testing (import Testing,
@Test, #expect, #require). XCTest is legacy in this repo.
When a diff modifies an existing XCTest case (i.e. the test file
already uses XCTestCase / func testXxx() and the PR changes one of
those tests), the test should be rewritten in Swift Testing as part of
the same change rather than patched in place. Touching a test is the
moment to migrate it.
Flag
- A newly added test file or test function that uses
XCTestCase /
XCTAssert* / func testXxx(). Recommend Swift Testing.
Severity: high.
- A modified XCTest test that was edited but not migrated to Swift
Testing. Ask the author to rewrite the touched test(s) using
@Test / #expect / #require. Severity: medium.
- Mixing
XCTAssert* calls inside a Swift Testing @Test (or vice
versa). Pick one framework per test.
Do not flag
- Pre-existing XCTest tests that the diff does not touch.
- XCTest-only APIs that have no Swift Testing equivalent yet (e.g.
XCUITest UI automation) — leave those on XCTest.
- Test helpers/fixtures that aren't themselves test cases.
When suggesting the migration, point at the project's Swift Testing
pattern (see cli/AGENTS.md): use @Test(.inTemporaryDirectory) and
FileSystem.temporaryTestDirectory for tests that need a temp dir, and
#require for unwrapping.