fabrico-designing-multi-cloud-architecture

name	fabrico-designing-multi-cloud-architecture
description	Design multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to select and integrate services across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use when building multi-cloud systems, avoiding vendor lock-in, or leveraging best-of-breed services from multiple providers.

Multi-Cloud Architecture

Decision framework and patterns for architecting applications across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

Purpose

Design cloud-agnostic architectures and make informed decisions about service selection across cloud providers.

When to Use

• Design multi-cloud strategies
• Migrate between cloud providers
• Select cloud services for specific workloads
• Implement cloud-agnostic architectures
• Optimize costs across providers

Cloud Service Comparison

Compute Services

AWS	Azure	GCP	Use Case
EC2	Virtual Machines	Compute Engine	IaaS VMs
ECS	Container Instances	Cloud Run	Containers
EKS	AKS	GKE	Kubernetes
Lambda	Functions	Cloud Functions	Serverless
Fargate	Container Apps	Cloud Run	Managed containers

Storage Services

AWS	Azure	GCP	Use Case
S3	Blob Storage	Cloud Storage	Object storage
EBS	Managed Disks	Persistent Disk	Block storage
EFS	Azure Files	Filestore	File storage
Glacier	Archive Storage	Archive Storage	Cold storage

Database Services

AWS	Azure	GCP	Use Case
RDS	SQL Database	Cloud SQL	Managed SQL
DynamoDB	Cosmos DB	Firestore	NoSQL
Aurora	PostgreSQL/MySQL	Cloud Spanner	Distributed SQL
ElastiCache	Cache for Redis	Memorystore	Caching

Reference: See references/service-comparison.md for complete comparison

Multi-Cloud Patterns

Pattern 1: Single Provider with DR

• Primary workload in one cloud
• Disaster recovery in another
• Database replication across clouds
• Automated failover

Pattern 2: Best-of-Breed

• Use best service from each provider
• AI/ML on GCP
• Enterprise apps on Azure
• General compute on AWS

Pattern 3: Geographic Distribution

• Serve users from nearest cloud region
• Data sovereignty compliance
• Global load balancing
• Regional failover

Pattern 4: Cloud-Agnostic Abstraction

• Kubernetes for compute
• PostgreSQL for database
• S3-compatible storage (MinIO)
• Open source tools

Cloud-Agnostic Architecture

Use Cloud-Native Alternatives

• Compute: Kubernetes (EKS/AKS/GKE)
• Database: PostgreSQL/MySQL (RDS/SQL Database/Cloud SQL)
• Message Queue: Apache Kafka (MSK/Event Hubs/Confluent)
• Cache: Redis (ElastiCache/Azure Cache/Memorystore)
• Object Storage: S3-compatible API
• Monitoring: Prometheus/Grafana
• Service Mesh: Istio/Linkerd

Abstraction Layers

Application Layer
    ↓
Infrastructure Abstraction (Terraform)
    ↓
Cloud Provider APIs
    ↓
AWS / Azure / GCP

Cost Comparison

Compute Pricing Factors

• AWS: On-demand, Reserved, Spot, Savings Plans
• Azure: Pay-as-you-go, Reserved, Spot
• GCP: On-demand, Committed use, Preemptible

Cost Optimization Strategies

1. Use reserved/committed capacity (30-70% savings)
2. Leverage spot/preemptible instances
3. Right-size resources
4. Use serverless for variable workloads
5. Optimize data transfer costs
6. Implement lifecycle policies
7. Use cost allocation tags
8. Monitor with cloud cost tools

Reference: See references/multi-cloud-patterns.md

Migration Strategy

Phase 1: Assessment

• Inventory current infrastructure
• Identify dependencies
• Assess cloud compatibility
• Estimate costs

Phase 2: Pilot

• Select pilot workload
• Implement in target cloud
• Test thoroughly
• Document learnings

Phase 3: Migration

• Migrate workloads incrementally
• Maintain dual-run period
• Monitor performance
• Validate functionality

Phase 4: Optimization

• Right-size resources
• Implement cloud-native services
• Optimize costs
• Enhance security

Process

1. Assess requirements → Identify drivers (DR, compliance, best-of-breed, cost)
2. Choose pattern → Select from patterns above based on requirements
3. Map services → Use service comparison tables to select equivalents
4. Design abstraction → Use Kubernetes + Terraform for portability
5. Plan networking → Design cross-cloud connectivity (VPN, interconnect)
6. Implement IaC → Use fabrico-implementing-terraform-modules skill
7. Set up observability → Unified monitoring across clouds
8. Document runbooks → Cloud-specific operational procedures

Checklist

• Multi-cloud drivers documented (DR, compliance, vendor diversification)
• Service equivalents mapped across target clouds
• Abstraction layer chosen (Kubernetes, Terraform, or both)
• Cross-cloud networking designed and secured
• Identity federation configured (single IAM source of truth)
• Unified monitoring and logging implemented
• Cost allocation and tracking across clouds
• DR/failover procedures tested
• Team trained on all target cloud platforms

Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't	✅ Do
Use proprietary services for portability needs	Choose cloud-agnostic alternatives (K8s, PostgreSQL)
Duplicate everything across clouds	Be intentional about what runs where
Manage each cloud differently	Use unified IaC and observability
Ignore data transfer costs	Design to minimize cross-cloud traffic

Reference Files

• references/service-comparison.md - Complete service comparison
• references/multi-cloud-patterns.md - Architecture patterns

Related Skills

• fabrico-implementing-terraform-modules - For IaC implementation
• fabrico-optimizing-cloud-cost - For cost management