| name | confidential-computing-attack |
| description | Attacks against Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) and confidential computing platforms — Intel SGX (Foreshadow/SGAxe/LVI/ÆPIC Leak), Intel TDX, AMD SEV/SEV-ES/SEV-SNP (CrossLine/BadRAM), Azure CCF, Marblerun, and Gramine/Occlum libos enclaves. Covers side-channel leakage, attestation forgery, ABI misuse, host-to-enclave breakout, enclave-to-host escape, and recovery of sealed secrets. Distinct from hardware-security (broad hardware attacks) and firmware-reverse (UEFI/BIOS). |
| origin | openclaw |
| version | 0.1.40 |
| compatibility | ["openclaw","claude-code","cursor","windsurf"] |
| allowed-tools | ["Bash","Read","Write","Edit","WebSearch","WebFetch"] |
| metadata | {"domain":"confidential-computing","tool_count":14,"guide_count":2,"mitre":"T1046-Network Service Discovery, T1602-Data from Configuration Repository"} |
Confidential Computing Attack
Supplementary Files:
payloads.md — Attack payloads organized by TEE: Intel SGX (Foreshadow/SGAxe/LVI/ÆPIC Leak), Intel TDX, AMD SEV-SNP (CrossLine/BadRAM), Azure CCF, Marblerun, Gramine/Occlum
test-cases.md — 18 structured test cases covering attestation forgery, side-channel leakage, ABI misuse, host-to-enclave breakout, and sealed-secret recovery
guides/confidential-computing-attack-playbook.md — End-to-end playbook with engagement scoping, lab setup (QEMU with SGX/SEV emulation), attestation workflow attacks, enclave breakout methodology, and blue-team detection
guides/real-world-incident-case-studies.md — Eight case studies including SGX Foreshadow (2018), SGAxe (2020), LVI (2020), ÆPIC Leak (2022), AMD SEV CrossLine (2025), BadRAM (2024), and Gramine ABI abuse
Summary
This skill targets confidential computing — the technology that protects data in use via hardware-isolated enclaves. While at-rest and in-transit encryption are well-understood, TEEs introduce a new attack surface: enclave attestation forgery, microarchitectural side channels, ABI misuse between enclave and untrusted host, and host-to-enclave breakout.
Tools: sgx-step, sgvisor, sev-tool, snp-lab, marblerun-cli, ccf-client, occlum-tools, gramine-direct, rust-sgx, edgelessrt, intel-sgx-sdk, sgxs-tools, libsgx, sgx_emulate
Domain: confidential-computing
MITRE ATT&CK: T1046 Network Service Discovery · T1602 Data from Configuration Repository · T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation · T1556 Modify Authentication Process
Description
Attacks against Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) and confidential computing platforms — Intel SGX (Foreshadow/SGAxe/LVI/ÆPIC Leak), Intel TDX, AMD SEV/SEV-ES/SEV-SNP (CrossLine/BadRAM), Azure CCF, Marblerun, and Gramine/Occlum libos enclaves.
Confidential computing assumes a strong threat model: the OS, hypervisor, BIOS, and even physical DRAM are untrusted. Only the TEE itself (the CPU enclave) is trusted. Attacks against this model fall into four broad categories:
- Microarchitectural side channels — exploiting CPU cache, branch predictor, TLB, or memory bus behavior to leak enclave secrets
- Attestation forgery — bypassing or faking attestation reports to make untrusted code appear trusted
- ABI misuse — abusing the carefully-specified boundary between enclave and untrusted host to corrupt enclave state
- Host-to-enclave breakout — escaping from an enclave back to the host, or vice versa
This skill is distinct from:
- hardware-security — which targets physical hardware attacks (JTAG, side-channel on chips, fault injection)
- firmware-reverse — which targets UEFI/BIOS, not runtime enclaves
- container-security — which targets container runtimes, not hardware isolation
- cloud-security — which targets cloud control planes broadly
Where container-security asks "can I escape this container?", confidential-computing-attack asks "given that this enclave is supposed to be impenetrable even to a malicious cloud provider, what corner cases let me violate that promise?"
Use Cases
- SGX attestation forgery — craft an IAS/DCAP attestation report that appears valid but represents untrusted code (e.g., for OCSP relay attacks)
- SGX sealed-secret recovery — extract the
Seal Key from a compromised platform to decrypt sealed secrets offline
- Foreshadow (L1TF) attack — read enclave memory from a sibling thread via L1 Terminal Fault
- SGAxe attack — extract the platform's EPID group key, allowing attestation forgery for any enclave on that platform
- LVI attack — inject faulting load operations to hijack enclave execution
- ÆPIC Leak — exploit APIC MMIO read to leak SGX enclave data
- AMD SEV-SNP attestation forgery — tamper with VLEK/VCEK signed attestation reports
- AMD CrossLine attack — break VM-to-VM isolation within SEV-SNP
- BadRAM attack — exploit DDR5 SPD SPD-Bypass on consumer DIMMs to break SEV-SNP guest memory integrity
- TDX attestation abuse — manipulate TDREPORT to make untrusted VM appear as trusted
- Azure CCF governance attack — abuse the consortium governance model to add a malicious node
- Marblerun manifest tamper — exploit weak EManifest validation to alter marble policy at runtime
- Gramine/Occlum libos escape — exploit syscall-emulation bugs to escape the libos back to host
Differentiation from Adjacent Skills
| Skill | Target | Boundary | Typical entry |
|---|
hardware-security | Physical chips, IoT devices | Physical access | JTAG, glitching |
firmware-reverse | UEFI/BIOS, Option ROM | Boot-time | DMA attacks, SMM |
container-security | OCI, K8s, containerd | Kernel namespace | Container escape |
confidential-computing-attack (this) | TEEs (SGX, TDX, SEV-SNP, CCF) | CPU enclave boundary | Side channel, attestation abuse |
cloud-security | CSP control plane | Cloud IAM | IAM enumeration |
kernel-exploitation | OS kernel | User/kernel boundary | Syscall misuse |
Core Tools
Intel SGX
- Intel SGX SDK — official SDK; includes
sgx_sign, sgx_edger8r
- sgx-step — single-step enclave execution, page-fault side channels (Ard et al., TU Wien)
- sgvisor — enclave hypervisor framework for research
- sgxs-tools — Rust utilities for SGX enclave file manipulation
- Foreshadow PoC — academic PoC for L1TF (Wikipedia: Foreshadow)
- SGAxe PoC — academic PoC for EPID key extraction
- LVI PoC — academic PoC for Load Value Injection
- ÆPIC Leak PoC — CVE-2022-21233 PoC
Intel TDX
- tdx-tools — Intel TDX development kit
- tdquote — TDX attestation quote generation
- QEMU with TDX support — confidential VM testing
AMD SEV / SEV-ES / SEV-SNP
- amdSEVTool — SEV/SEV-SNP attestation utilities
- sev-snp-lab — local CVM testing harness
- SEV-SNP guest tools — guest-side attestation helper
- CrossLine PoC — research tooling for SEV-SNP VM isolation attacks
Azure CCF
- ccf-cli — CCF consortium governance CLI
- ccf-client — RPC client for CCF nodes
- ccf-recovery — disaster recovery tooling
Marblerun
- marblerun-cli — manifest management
- edgelessrt — runtime SDK
LibOS Enclaves
- gramine-direct — Gramine libos CLI
- occlum-tools — Occlum libos CLI
- sgx-lkl — SGX-LKL libos
Methodology
Phase 1 — Reconnaissance
- Identify SGX/TDX/SEV-SNP usage in target (binary inspection for SGX instructions like
encls, enclu, enclv)
- Identify attestation provider (Intel IAS, Intel DCAP, AMD VCEK, Azure CCF, custom attestation service)
- Map enclave binary: identify ECALLs, OCALLs, edge routines
- Identify attestation report format (EPID, DCAP, ECDSA)
- Identify sealed-secret storage locations
Phase 2 — Attestation Attacks
- Replay old attestation reports
- Forge attestation reports via IAS/DCAP compromise
- Exploit weak quote verification (date, nonce, key)
- Abuse advisory (allow-list) policies on outdated enclave versions
- Apply CCF governance attack to add malicious node
Phase 3 — Microarchitectural Side Channels
- Identify secret-dependent branches in enclave
- Deploy cache timing attacks (Prime+Probe, Flush+Reload)
- Deploy branch prediction attacks (Spectre variant in enclave)
- Deploy SGX-Step for single-step page-fault side channels
- Apply Foreshadow (L1TM) for enclave memory reads
- Apply SGAxe for EPID key extraction
Phase 4 — ABI Misuse
- Review ECALL/OCALL signatures for untrusted-pointer dereferences
- Identify buffer overflows in edge routines
- Identify integer overflows in array length checks
- Exploit missing check_*
- Race-condition in asynchronous edge calls (AEX race)
Phase 5 — Enclave Breakout / Escape
- Identify libos syscall-emulation bugs (Gramine, Occlum)
- Exploit memory layout assumptions (TLS region, stack)
- Forge shared memory mappings between enclave and host
- Abuse insecure key derivation for sealed secrets
Phase 6 — Sealed Secret Recovery
- Extract
Seal Key derivation parameters from platform
- Compute Seal Key offline using leaked
CPU_SIG or fused key
- Decrypt sealed secrets from disk
- Pivot to enclave's persisted state
Phase 7 — TEE Host Compromise
- Compromise host kernel to feed malicious SGX instructions
- Use AEX notify to time enclave execution
- Deploy ÆPIC Leak (CVE-2022-21233) for APIC-based read
- Deploy LVI (CVE-2020-0551) for faulting-load injection
Phase 8 — TDX / SEV-SNP Specific
- TDX: abuse TDREPORT signing
- SEV-SNP: exploit VCEK key reuse
- SEV-SNP: apply CrossLine for VM-to-VM isolation break
- SEV-SNP: apply BadRAM for DDR5 SPD-bypass memory integrity break
Defense Perspective
Core Principles
- Defense in depth — assume any single TEE may be compromised; layer attestation, code signing, and runtime checks
- Quote verification is critical — never accept attestation reports without verifying signature, freshness, and nonce
- Advisory policy is policy — Intel's "advisory allowlist" lets unpatched enclaves still attest; decide explicitly
- Sealed secrets require key rotation — rotate Seal Key after platform firmware updates
- Side-channel resistance is hard — assume data-dependent branches leak; use constant-time crypto
Hardening Checklist
Detection
- Attestation report anomaly detection (new advisory IDs, new MRENCLAVE)
- Side-channel detection via performance counter anomalies
- Sealed-secret decryption anomaly rate
- TEE error injection attempts (enclave CPUID mismatch)
Practical Steps
SGX Recon
nm enclave.signed.so | grep -E "sgx_|ecall" to find entry points
objdump -d enclave.signed.so for SGX instruction patterns (enclu, encls)
sgx_sign dump -key ... -enclave ... -dumpfile ... for metadata
SGX Attestation Replay
- Capture a valid attestation report (older or from compromised platform)
- Replay to relying party without fresh nonce
- If relying party doesn't verify nonce → accept stale report
SGX Foreshadow (L1TM) Recovery
- Deploy sibling thread that triggers enclave page fault
- Use
sgx-step to single-step enclave execution
- Apply L1 Terminal Fault to leak enclave cache lines
- Reconstruct secret from cache line samples
AMD SEV-SNP Attestation Audit
sev-tool --get_vcek to fetch the platform's VCEK certificate
- Verify attestation report signature against VCEK
- Check policy fields (abi_major, abi_minor, smt)
- Compare MEASUREMENT field against expected guest measurement
Azure CCF Governance Attack
- Identify network consortium (config.json: members, certificates)
- Compromise a member's private key (or social-engineer a quorum member)
- Submit
set_constitution proposal to add malicious operator
- If accepted → malicious node joins network
Gramine LibOS Recon
gramine-sgx-sign --manifest app.manifest to inspect manifest
gramine-sgx-token to generate runtime measurement
- Identify syscall emulation bugs via fuzzing (e.g.,
gramine-sgx-direct --trace-syscalls)
Cross-References
skills/hardware-security/SKILL.md — physical hardware attacks (JTAG, fault injection)
skills/firmware-reverse/SKILL.md — UEFI/BIOS / SMM attacks
skills/binary-reverse/SKILL.md — enclave binary static analysis
skills/crypto-attacks/SKILL.md — attestation report cryptography analysis
skills/cloud-security/SKILL.md — confidential VMs in cloud (Azure DCsv3, AWS Nitro Enclaves)
skills/container-security/SKILL.md — confidential containers (Kata + SGX)
References
- Intel — Intel SGX Developer Reference (2024)
- AMD — SEV-SNP Firmware ABI Specification (2024)
- Microsoft — Azure Confidential Cloud (CCF) Documentation (2024)
- Foreshadow — Masters of SGX (USENIX Security 2018)
- SGAxe — How to Steal the SGX Attestation Key (CCS 2020)
- LVI — Load Value Injection (IEEE S&P 2020)
- ÆPIC Leak — CVE-2022-21233 (BlackHat USA 2022)
- CrossLine — Breaking SEV-SNP VM Isolation (USENIX Security 2025)
- BadRAM — DDR5 SPD Bypass (USENIX Security 2024)
- Gramine — Documentation and Threat Model (2024)
- Occlum — Threat Model Paper (IEEE S&P 2021)