| name | commres-submission |
| description | Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Communication Research (CR) via SAGE Track (ScholarOne) — double-anonymized preparation, the 45-page limit, APA reporting, the data-availability statement, ORCID, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content. |
Submission Preflight (commres-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on SAGE Track (ScholarOne). CR is double-anonymized, so
the single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized main document or supplement. Verify
volatile specifics on the SAGE author page before relying on them.
When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata SAGE Track expects
- Confirming the page limit, APA reporting, and anonymization are clean
Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- Publisher: SAGE Publishing. Founded 1974; bimonthly; ISSN 0093-6502 (print) / 1552-3810
(online).
- Portal: SAGE Track (ScholarOne); author guidelines at
journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/crx (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Review model: double-anonymized — anonymize the main document and supplemental materials;
provide a separate title page. An initial evaluation precedes peer review; two independent
reviews are required to back a Revise or Accept. Reviewers recommend to the Co-editors, who make
the final decision.
- Reviewer suggestions: the journal assigns reviewers and does not accept author
recommendations — do not include a suggested-reviewer list.
- Length: manuscript no more than 45 pages, double-spaced, inclusive of references;
supplementary files do not count toward the page limit.
- Abstract: unstructured, no more than 150 words, placed between title and main body;
clinical-trial registration details (if applicable) go at the end of the abstract.
- Special issues: CR does not publish special issues and does not work with guest editors.
- Preprints: accepted as prior posting — supply the DOI at submission, and add the
final-version link if accepted.
- Style & reporting: APA; report statistics in line with APA — standard deviations and effect
sizes where applicable; power analysis, confidence intervals for bootstrapping, and correlation
matrices (as an online appendix) are encouraged where relevant.
- Self-citations: written in the third person.
- Transparency: data-availability statement expected; note any preregistration in the cover
letter; deposit open-materials/data if claiming open practices; provide ORCID where requested.
- Fee: no submission fee for the standard (subscription) route (verified 2026-06-22); an optional
open-access APC applies only if you choose OA after acceptance — SAGE sets the amount on its live
OA page (confirm before quoting).
- Editors: final decisions rest with the Co-Editors — Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick (Ohio State)
& Jennifer Gibbs (UC Santa Barbara) (verified 2026-06-22); editor roles rotate, so confirm the
current masthead on the live SAGE page before naming them.
Preflight checklist
Format & length
Anonymity (double-anonymized)
Reporting & metadata
Compliance & files
Desk-reject and return-to-author patterns (avoidable before upload)
| Trigger seen at intake | Editor action | Preflight fix |
|---|
| Author name in main doc or file properties | returned for anonymity | strip metadata; identity to the title page |
| Manuscript over 45 double-spaced pages (refs counted) | returned for length | move specs/scales/robustness to the supplement |
| Stars-only results, no effect sizes | returned for APA reporting | add d/η²ₚ/β + CIs; report SDs |
| Qualitative/descriptive submission | declined without review | re-route to a generalist/digital sibling, or add a tested mechanism |
| Abstract over 150 words or structured | returned incomplete | trim to ≤ 150 words, unstructured, between title and body |
| No data-availability statement | flagged incomplete | add the statement (repository + identifier, or exemption) |
Calibration anchor: what "ready" means at CR (hedged)
A CR-ready submission clears three bars at once: a tested communication mechanism (not a bare
effect), valid, reliably measured constructs an expert referee will trust, and APA-standard
reporting with effect sizes and uncertainty. Volatile specifics — exact caps, APC, masthead,
timelines — drift; confirm against the current SAGE author page (待核实).
Worked micro-example: a 5-minute anonymity sweep (illustrative)
Before upload, a survey-experiment manuscript runs the sweep: (1) search the main doc for the author
surname — two first-person self-cites get rewritten in the third person; (2) an OSF link in the
supplement resolving to a named project is swapped for a view-only anonymized link; (3) clear the
author field in document properties; (4) confirm the scale items and CFA table sit in the supplement,
not the main text, keeping the manuscript under 45 pages. All four would otherwise return the paper.
Anti-patterns
- Leaving author identifiers in the text, supplements, or file metadata (breaks anonymization)
- First-person self-references ("as we previously found") instead of third-person
- Reporting significance without effect sizes (an APA-reporting failure at CR)
- Manuscript over 45 double-spaced pages because supplements were not used
- Omitting the data-availability statement
Output format
【Anonymized】main doc + supplements + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Self-citations third person】[Y/N]
【Length】≤ 45 double-spaced pp incl. references? [Y/N]
【APA reporting】effect sizes + CIs/SDs, mediation bootstrap CIs? [Y/N]
【Title page】separate non-anonymous file with bio + ORCID? [Y/N]
【Data-availability statement】included? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → commres-rebuttal on R&R
Supplementary resources
