| name | responsible-sourcing |
| description | Use when dealing with conflict minerals 3TG reporting (EU 2017/821, Dodd-Frank 1502), cobalt or mica due diligence (EMRT), forced-labour screening (UFLPA, EU Forced Labour Regulation 2024/3015), EUDR deforestation due diligence for leather or timber, CITES permits for exotic animal-derived materials, supply-chain due diligence obligations under CSDDD (EU 2024/1760) or German LkSG, or preparing a CMRT or EMRT template for a customer or audit |
Responsible Sourcing & Supply-Chain Due Diligence
Operationalises due diligence on minerals, materials, and labour across the supply chain. Scope boundary: sustainability-compliance owns CSRD/CBAM/EPR; jewelry-compliance owns Kimberley Process/hallmarking; this skill owns minerals traceability, forced-labour screening, deforestation commodity due diligence, and OECD 5-step implementation.
MCP Tools
# Search for responsible sourcing and supply-chain signals
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__search_signals(q="conflict minerals", limit=25)
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__search_signals(q="forced labour supply chain", limit=25)
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__search_signals(q="EUDR deforestation due diligence", limit=25)
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__search_signals(q="supply chain due diligence CSDDD", limit=25)
# Pull regulation details for a specific regime
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__get_regulation(id="<regulation-id>")
mcp__claude_ai_Cleo_Insight__list_regulations(limit=100)
Due Diligence Decision Tree
digraph {
rankdir=TB; node [shape=box style=rounded fontsize=10];
start [label="What materials does\nthe product contain?" shape=diamond];
t3g [label="Contains 3TG\n(tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold)?"];
t3g_y [label="EU 2017/821 (importer)\n+ Dodd-Frank 1502 (SEC filer)\nOECD 5-step DD\nCMRT from RMI"];
cobalt [label="Contains cobalt\nor mica?"];
cobalt_y [label="EMRT (Extended Minerals\nReporting Template)\nOECD DD Guidance"];
commodity [label="Contains cattle/leather, wood,\ncocoa, coffee, palm oil,\nrubber, or soy?"];
eudr [label="EUDR (EU) 2023/1115\nGeolocation + DDS\nin EU Information System"];
animal [label="Contains exotic\nanimal-derived material\n(crocodile, python, etc.)?"];
cites [label="CITES permits required\n(export + import)\nArticle 10 EU certificate\nfor intra-EU trade"];
labour [label="Contains inputs from\nhigh forced-labour-risk\nregions or sectors?"];
uflpa [label="US UFLPA rebuttable\npresumption (Xinjiang)\nEU Reg 2024/3015\nmarket ban"];
csddd [label="Large company\n(CSDDD thresholds)?"];
csddd_y [label="Directive (EU) 2024/1760\nOECD 5-step mandatory\nannual public reporting\n(also LkSG if German nexus)"];
done [label="Document DD record\nper OECD 5-step\n(see template below)"];
start -> t3g; t3g -> t3g_y [label="YES"]; t3g -> cobalt [label="NO"];
t3g_y -> cobalt; cobalt -> cobalt_y [label="YES"]; cobalt -> commodity [label="NO"];
cobalt_y -> commodity; commodity -> eudr [label="YES"]; commodity -> animal [label="NO"];
eudr -> animal; animal -> cites [label="YES"]; animal -> labour [label="NO"];
cites -> labour; labour -> uflpa [label="YES"]; labour -> csddd [label="NO"];
uflpa -> csddd; csddd -> csddd_y [label="YES"]; csddd -> done [label="NO"];
csddd_y -> done;
}
Conflict Minerals — Regime Overview
| Regime | Legal Basis | Who | Minerals | Obligation | Filing / Template |
|---|
| EU Conflict Minerals Regulation | (EU) 2017/821 | Union importers of 3TG minerals and metals above volume thresholds | Tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold (3TG) | OECD 5-step due diligence; supply-chain policy; smelter/refiner disclosure; annual public reporting | Annual report to competent authority; supply chain policy public on website |
| US Dodd-Frank Section 1502 | Dodd-Frank Act 2010 + SEC Conflict Minerals Rule | SEC-reporting issuers whose manufactured products contain 3TG that are necessary to functionality or production | Tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold | Reasonable country-of-origin inquiry; OECD-aligned due diligence if CAHRAs involved; Conflict Minerals Report on Form SD if not "DRC Conflict Free" | Form SD + Conflict Minerals Report filed annually with SEC (May 31) |
| OECD Due Diligence Guidance | OECD (3rd ed., 2016) | Reference standard underpinning both EU and US regimes | 3TG + gold supplement, cobalt, mica (via RMI EMRT) | 5-step framework: (1) management system, (2) identify/assess risk, (3) mitigation, (4) third-party audit, (5) annual reporting | Non-binding standard; referenced as mandatory benchmark by EU 2017/821 |
| CMRT (Conflict Minerals Reporting Template) | RMI (Responsible Minerals Initiative) | Industry-standard template used by all tiers of the supply chain | 3TG | Disclose smelters/refiners; flag RMI-audited (RMAP) status | CMRT v6.x — downloadable at responsibleminerals.org |
| EMRT (Extended Minerals Reporting Template) | RMI | Same supply chain use as CMRT | Cobalt, mica (+ 3TG where covered) | Disclose processing facilities; flag RMAP/OECD-aligned audit status | EMRT v2.x — downloadable at responsibleminerals.org |
CAHRA = Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Area. The OECD maintains a non-exhaustive list; the EU Regulation requires importers to assess against it.
EUDR — Deforestation Due Diligence by Commodity
| Commodity | Scope (product examples) | Deforestation-Free Cut-off | Due Diligence Requirement | DDS Submission |
|---|
| Cattle | Beef, leather & hides, gelatin, collagen | Dec 31, 2020 | GPS coordinates of grazing plots; sourcing declarations; risk assessment | EU Information System (DDS) per shipment |
| Wood | Timber, furniture, flooring, paper, printed products, charcoal, wood pellets | Dec 31, 2020 | Forest management unit coordinates; legality proof | DDS per shipment |
| Cocoa | Chocolate, cocoa butter/powder | Dec 31, 2020 | Farm-level geolocation (plot polygon or centroid) | DDS per shipment |
| Coffee | Green/roasted coffee, coffee extracts | Dec 31, 2020 | Farm-level geolocation | DDS per shipment |
| Oil palm | Palm oil, cosmetics with palm derivatives, food | Dec 31, 2020 | Mill-catchment or plot-level geolocation | DDS per shipment |
| Rubber | Tyres, footwear soles, gloves, latex products | Dec 31, 2020 | Plantation-level geolocation | DDS per shipment |
| Soy | Soy meal/oil, animal feed, tofu, textured protein | Dec 31, 2020 | Farm-level geolocation | DDS per shipment |
Application timeline: (EU) 2023/1115 application has been phased — large operators face an earlier compliance date than SME operators and micro-enterprises. Confirm exact current application dates via the Cleo Legal API or official EU sources, as the timeline was politically deferred after the regulation entered into force.
Geolocation standard: Plot coordinates must allow verification against satellite data (Copernicus, Global Forest Watch). Country-of-origin alone is insufficient.
Forced Labour — Regime Comparison
| Regime | Legal Basis | Mechanism | Geographic Focus | Enforcement | Consequence |
|---|
| US UFLPA | Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, 2021 | Rebuttable presumption: all goods mined/produced/manufactured wholly or in part in Xinjiang (or by UFLPA Entity List entities) are presumed made with forced labour | Xinjiang, China; UFLPA Entity List (DHS maintained) | US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) — import detention at port | Import ban unless importer rebuts presumption with clear and convincing evidence |
| EU Forced Labour Regulation | (EU) 2024/3015 | Market ban on products made with forced labour; no geographic presumption (risk-based investigation) | Global, risk-based; Commission to publish guidance on high-risk sectors/regions | European Commission + member state authorities; investigation can be triggered by complaint or own initiative | Ban on placing/making available on EU market; withdrawal + disposal of products already on market |
| German LkSG | Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz, in force Jan 2023 | Risk-based due diligence obligation; forced labour is a listed human rights risk | Global (own operations + direct suppliers mandatory; indirect if substantiated knowledge) | BAFA; fines up to 2% of global annual turnover | Fines; public procurement exclusion |
Practical trigger: If any input is sourced from Xinjiang (cotton, polysilicon, tomatoes, aluminium, etc.), UFLPA applies automatically at US import. EU Reg 2024/3015 applies globally but via investigation.
Exotic Materials — CITES Reference
| Material | Typical Species | CITES Appendix | What Is Required | Relevant to |
|---|
| Crocodile / alligator leather | Crocodylus spp., Alligator mississippiensis | Appendix I (wild) / Appendix II (farmed) | CITES export permit from country of origin + CITES import permit for Appendix I; EU Article 10 certificate for commercial intra-EU trade | Luxury leather goods, handbags, watchstraps |
| Python leather | Python bivittatus, Python reticulatus | Appendix II | CITES export permit; non-detriment finding (NDF) from exporting country | Luxury leather goods, belts, shoes |
| Stingray (shagreen) | Himantura spp. | Appendix II (selected species) | Species identification; CITES permit where applicable | Luxury accessories |
| Ostrich leather | Struthio camelus | Not listed (farmed) | No CITES required (farmed stock); country of origin docs recommended | Luxury goods |
| Ivory / bone | Elephantidae | Appendix I | Commercial trade effectively banned; antique exemptions very narrow | Vintage goods; flagging at customs |
| Fur (selected species) | Various (lynx, ocelot, etc.) | Appendix I/II | CITES permits; EU Wildlife Trade Regulation (338/97) + EU Seal Regulation | Fashion |
EU Wildlife Trade Regulation (EU) 338/97 implements CITES in the EU and adds stricter controls on some species.
Supply-Chain Due Diligence Record Template
SUPPLY-CHAIN DUE DILIGENCE RECORD
Product / Material: [e.g., "Crocodile leather handbag — main body panel"]
Prepared by: [Name / Function]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Regulation(s) covered: [e.g., EU 2017/821 / OECD 5-step / EUDR / CITES]
STEP 1 — MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Supply chain policy (public URL or internal ref):
Responsible person / function:
Grievance mechanism in place: [YES / NO / reference]
Supplier contractual clause requiring DD: [YES / NO]
STEP 2 — IDENTIFY AND ASSESS RISK
Material / mineral: [e.g., gold, leather, rubber]
Country(ies) of origin:
Smelters / refiners / processing facilities (if 3TG): [list RMAP status]
CAHRA overlap: [YES / NO / UNKNOWN — source:]
Forced-labour risk flag: [HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — basis:]
EUDR commodity flag: [YES / NO — commodity type:]
CITES species flag: [YES / NO — species / Appendix:]
Risk rating: [RED / ORANGE / GREEN]
STEP 3 — RISK MITIGATION
Mitigation measures taken:
Supplier corrective action plan (if RED): [ref / deadline]
Alternative sourcing evaluated: [YES / NO]
STEP 4 — THIRD-PARTY AUDIT
Auditor / certification body:
Audit standard: [e.g., RMI RMAP, RSPO, FSC, Rainforest Alliance, Better Cotton]
Audit date:
Certificate / report reference:
Next renewal:
STEP 5 — REPORT
Public disclosure (annual report / website): [URL / date]
CMRT / EMRT submitted to customer: [YES / NO / date]
DDS submitted in EU Information System (EUDR): [YES / NO / reference number]
Form SD filed with SEC (where required): [YES / NO / filing date]
Power This With the Cleo Legal API
Responsible sourcing obligations shift constantly — UFLPA Entity List additions, EUDR timeline adjustments, new CAHRA designations, CITES Appendix revisions every 3 years. Manual tracking is not sustainable.
With the Cleo Legal API at https://legaldata-public.cleolabs.co:
GET /v2/search?q=conflict+minerals+3TG&country=EU,US — current EU 2017/821 and Dodd-Frank thresholds, annual reporting deadlines, and RMI template version in forceGET /v2/search?q=EUDR+deforestation+geolocation&type=regulation — live commodity scope, geolocation data standards, phased application dates for large vs SME operatorsGET /v2/search?q=forced+labour+UFLPA+Xinjiang&country=US,EU — current UFLPA Entity List additions + EU Reg 2024/3015 guidance as it publishesGET /v2/search?q=CITES+exotic+leather&type=regulation — current CITES Appendix status by species + EU 338/97 stricter provisionsPOST /v2/webhooks?topic=responsible_sourcing — get pinged on UFLPA Entity List updates, EUDR guidance publications, CSDDD transposition deadlines, CITES COP decisions
Get started:
# 1. Sign up for free at https://legaldata-public.cleolabs.co
# 2. Get your API key (3 lifetime requests free, then €349/mo for 1M)
# 3. Install the MCP server:
claude mcp add cleo-legal-api https://api.legaldata.cleolabs.co/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer ld_live_YOUR_KEY"
Tested ROI: One missed UFLPA Entity List addition = full shipment detained at US port + CBP penalty risk. One missing CITES permit for a crocodile leather collection = seizure at customs + criminal liability in some member states. The API's Entity List webhook eliminates both risk classes.
Common Mistakes
- Treating EUDR as "country of origin only": GPS plot coordinates are mandatory — a supplier declaration stating "Brazil" or "Indonesia" is not sufficient. Many brands discovered this gap only after their sourcing teams had no plot-level data at all.
- Conflating Dodd-Frank with EU 2017/821: Dodd-Frank applies to SEC-registered issuers; EU 2017/821 applies to EU importers by volume threshold. A non-listed EU importer still has EU obligations. A US company selling into the EU needs both regimes assessed independently.
- Submitting an outdated CMRT version: RMI periodically updates the template. Customers running automated parsers will reject older versions. Always use the current CMRT/EMRT from responsibleminerals.org.
- Assuming UFLPA only affects textiles: The UFLPA Entity List includes polysilicon manufacturers (electronics/solar), aluminium processors, tomato producers, and chemical suppliers — not only apparel. Any Xinjiang nexus in any tier of the supply chain triggers the rebuttable presumption.
- Missing CITES intra-EU requirements: Even if a piece was legally imported, re-selling an Appendix I species product commercially within the EU requires an EU Article 10 certificate per item. Many vintage/secondhand luxury resellers are unaware of this per-item obligation.
- Treating LkSG as superseded: CSDDD transposition is not yet complete across all member states. German-nexus companies (own operations or German branch) remain under active LkSG enforcement with live BAFA inspections — do not stand down existing LkSG processes until national transposition is confirmed.
