| name | quarterly-planning-template |
| enabled | true |
| description | Use when performing quarterly planning template — provides a structured
framework for engineering quarterly planning, covering goal setting, capacity
allocation, dependency mapping, risk assessment, and milestone definition.
This template helps engineering teams align their quarterly work with
organizational objectives while maintaining realistic commitments and
appropriate investment in tech debt and innovation.
|
| required_connections | [{"prefix":"ticketing","label":"Ticketing System"},{"prefix":"collaboration","label":"Collaboration Tool"}] |
| config_fields | [{"key":"team_name","label":"Team Name","required":true,"placeholder":"e.g., Core Infrastructure"},{"key":"quarter","label":"Quarter","required":true,"placeholder":"e.g., Q2 2026"}] |
| features | ["QUARTERLY_PLANNING","ENGINEERING_MANAGEMENT","ROADMAP"] |
Quarterly Planning Template
Phase 1: Context and Inputs
Gather inputs needed for planning.
| Factor | Value |
|---|
| Team size (engineers) | |
| Working days in quarter | |
| Planned PTO / holidays (days) | |
| On-call tax (% of capacity) | |
| Available engineering weeks | |
Investment Allocation (target %):
| Category | Target % | Weeks |
|---|
| Feature work | | |
| Tech debt / reliability | | |
| Innovation / exploration | | |
| On-call / operational | | |
| Total | 100% | |
Phase 2: Goal Setting
Define 3-5 quarterly goals aligned with organizational objectives.
| # | Goal | Org Objective Alignment | Success Criteria | Confidence (H/M/L) |
|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |
| 3 | | | | |
| 4 | | | | |
| 5 | | | | |
Phase 3: Milestone Planning
Break goals into monthly milestones.
Month 1:
| Milestone | Goal # | Owner | Dependencies | Status |
|---|
| | | | |
Month 2:
| Milestone | Goal # | Owner | Dependencies | Status |
|---|
| | | | |
Month 3:
| Milestone | Goal # | Owner | Dependencies | Status |
|---|
| | | | |
Phase 4: Dependency and Risk Analysis
Cross-team dependencies:
| Dependency | Owning Team | Needed By | Status | Risk |
|---|
| | | Confirmed / Pending | H/M/L |
Risks:
| Risk | Likelihood (H/M/L) | Impact (H/M/L) | Mitigation |
|---|
| | | |
Phase 5: Communication and Tracking
Counter-Rationalizations
| Shortcut | Counter | Why |
|---|
| "We can skip some steps for this case" | Adapt the workflow steps, don't skip them | Skipped steps are where incidents and oversights originate |
| "The user seems to already know what to do" | Complete all workflow phases with the user | The workflow catches blind spots that experience alone misses |
| "This is a minor case, full process is overkill" | Scale the process down, don't turn it off | Minor cases become major when unstructured; the process scales, not disappears |
| "I'll fill in the details later" | Complete each section before moving on | Deferred details are forgotten; real-time capture is more accurate |
| "The template output isn't necessary" | Always produce the structured output format | Structured output enables comparison, audit trails, and handoff to other teams |
Output Format
Summary
- Team: ___
- Quarter: ___
- Goals: ___
- Available capacity: ___ engineering weeks
- Key dependencies: ___
- Top risk: ___
Action Items