docs-review

name	docs-review
description	Enforce documentation quality, completeness, and mutual consistency across architecture files, ADRs, runbooks, READMEs, and code-level documentation. You MUST load this skill when asked to review or check consistency of documentation (such as *.md/*.mmd files).
license	MIT

Docs Review

Guidance for reviewing core architecture, documentation, and constraint files for mutual consistency and accuracy. Use this skill when checking repository documentation.

When to Use

• Checking core architecture files (*.mmd, *.mzn) for consistency.
• Reviewing documentation (**/AGENTS.md, **/README.md) for outdated references.
• After any significant architectural decision to verify documentation exists and is accurate.
• When encountering complex code to ensure it's properly documented.
• When verifying an operational procedure or tradeoff.

When Not to Use

• For performing deep code execution or logic validation (use tester or code-review instead).
• When the user explicitly requests purely formatting/linting fixes (use markdown or yaml skills).
• For writing completely new features from scratch without reviewing existing architecture.

Common Pitfalls

• Overzealous Editing: Modifying architectural constraint files (CONSTRAINTS.mzn) arbitrarily without understanding the global impact, leading to runtime failures.
• Surface-Level Checks: Verifying that a markdown file exists without actually reading its content to ensure it accurately reflects the current codebase.
• Ignoring Dependency Context: Updating a README file while neglecting the corresponding AGENTS.md or ADR, creating localized inconsistency.

Core Process

1. Analyze Relationships: Cross-reference the relationships, definitions, rules, and configurations defined across these files.
2. Identify Inconsistencies: Look for contradictions, outdated references, missing updates, or structural mismatches between files.
3. Verify Up-to-Date Status: Check if any of the documentation lags behind the current state of the repository.
4. Conditional Edits: CRITICAL INSTRUCTION: ONLY apply changes to these files if actual inconsistencies, contradictions, or outdated information are found. If all files are mutually consistent and up-to-date, do not make any edits—simply report back that the files are in order.

Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) Verification

Verify: Every significant decision has an ADR (typically stored in docs/decisions/).

Code-Level Documentation Verification

Verify: Every non-obvious code block has a "why" comment. Verify: Code-level comments don't state the obvious.

Runbooks Verification

Verify: Every on-call alert has a linked runbook (typically stored in docs/runbooks/).

README Currency Verification

Verify: README reflects current state (not v1 state). Verify: Setup instructions work on a fresh machine. Verify: Architecture diagrams are up to date.

Subdirectory Agents (AGENTS.md) Verification

Verify: Subdirectories with specific functionality have local AGENTS.md context files. Verify: Local AGENTS.md aligns with the global repository invariants.

Verification Checklist

• ADRs written for significant architectural decisions
• Non-obvious code blocks have "why" comments
• Every production alert has a linked runbook
• README is current and setup instructions work
• Subdirectories with specific functionality have local AGENTS.md context files

Related Skills

• critical-thinking: You MUST load this skill when deconstructing complex documentation and identifying structural contradictions.
• docs-writer: Guidance for writing and maintaining documentation. You MUST load this skill when asked to write, document, or generate new documentation.