snapshot-testing

name	snapshot-testing
description	Use Verify for snapshot testing in .NET. Approve API surfaces, HTTP responses, rendered emails, and serialized outputs. Detect unintended changes through human-reviewed baseline files.
invocable	false

Snapshot Testing with Verify

When to Use This Skill

Use snapshot testing when:

• Verifying rendered output (HTML emails, reports, generated code)
• Approving public API surfaces for breaking change detection
• Testing HTTP response bodies and headers
• Validating serialization output
• Catching unintended changes in complex objects

---

What is Snapshot Testing?

Snapshot testing captures output and compares it against a human-approved baseline:

1. First run: Test generates a .received. file with actual output
2. Human review: Developer approves it, creating a .verified. file
3. Subsequent runs: Test compares output against .verified. file
4. Changes detected: Test fails, diff tool shows differences for review

This catches unintended changes while allowing intentional changes through explicit approval.

---

Installation

Add Verify Package

dotnet add package Verify.Xunit
# or for other test frameworks:
dotnet add package Verify.NUnit
dotnet add package Verify.MSTest

Configure ModuleInitializer

Create a ModuleInitializer.cs in your test project:

using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;

public static class ModuleInitializer
{
    [ModuleInitializer]
    public static void Init()
    {
        // Use source-file-relative paths for verified files
        VerifyBase.UseProjectRelativeDirectory("Snapshots");

        // Configure diff tool (optional - auto-detected)
        // DiffTools.UseOrder(DiffTool.Rider, DiffTool.VisualStudioCode);
    }
}

---

Basic Usage

Simple Object Verification

[Fact]
public Task VerifyUserDto()
{
    var user = new UserDto(
        Id: "user-123",
        Name: "John Doe",
        Email: "[e-mail]",
        CreatedAt: new DateTime(2025, 1, 15));

    return Verify(user);
}

Creates VerifyUserDto.verified.txt:

{
  Id: user-123,
  Name: John Doe,
  Email: [e-mail],
  CreatedAt: 2025-01-15T00:00:00
}

String/HTML Verification

[Fact]
public async Task VerifyRenderedEmail()
{
    var html = await _emailRenderer.RenderAsync("Welcome", new { Name = "John" });

    // Use extension parameter for proper file naming
    await Verify(html, extension: "html");
}

Creates VerifyRenderedEmail.verified.html - viewable in browser.

---

Email Template Testing

Use Verify to catch unintended changes in rendered email templates:

[Fact]
public async Task UserSignupInvitation_RendersCorrectly()
{
    var renderer = _services.GetRequiredService<IMjmlTemplateRenderer>();

    var variables = new Dictionary<string, string>
    {
        { "OrganizationName", "Acme Corporation" },
        { "InviteeName", "John Doe" },
        { "InviterName", "Jane Admin" },
        { "InvitationLink", "https://example.com/invite/abc123" },
        { "ExpirationDate", "December 31, 2025" }
    };

    var html = await renderer.RenderTemplateAsync(
        "UserInvitations/UserSignupInvitation",
        variables);

    await Verify(html, extension: "html");
}

Benefits for email testing:

• Catches CSS/layout regressions
• Detects broken template variables
• Visual review in diff tool
• Version control tracks email changes

---

API Surface Approval

Prevent accidental breaking changes to public APIs:

[Fact]
public Task ApprovePublicApi()
{
    var assembly = typeof(MyLibrary.PublicClass).Assembly;

    var publicApi = assembly.GetExportedTypes()
        .OrderBy(t => t.FullName)
        .Select(t => new
        {
            Type = t.FullName,
            Members = t.GetMembers(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static)
                .Where(m => m.DeclaringType == t)
                .OrderBy(m => m.Name)
                .Select(m => m.ToString())
        });

    return Verify(publicApi);
}

Or use the dedicated ApiApprover package:

dotnet add package PublicApiGenerator
dotnet add package Verify.Xunit

[Fact]
public Task ApproveApi()
{
    var api = typeof(MyPublicClass).Assembly.GeneratePublicApi();
    return Verify(api);
}

Creates .verified.txt with full API surface - any change requires explicit approval.

---

HTTP Response Testing

[Fact]
public async Task GetUser_ReturnsExpectedResponse()
{
    var client = _factory.CreateClient();

    var response = await client.GetAsync("/api/users/123");

    // Verify status, headers, and body together
    await Verify(new
    {
        StatusCode = response.StatusCode,
        Headers = response.Headers
            .Where(h => h.Key.StartsWith("X-"))  // Custom headers only
            .ToDictionary(h => h.Key, h => h.Value.First()),
        Body = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync()
    });
}

---

Scrubbing Dynamic Values

Handle timestamps, GUIDs, and other dynamic content:

[Fact]
public Task VerifyOrder()
{
    var order = new Order
    {
        Id = Guid.NewGuid(),  // Different every run
        CreatedAt = DateTime.UtcNow,  // Different every run
        Total = 99.99m
    };

    return Verify(order)
        .ScrubMember("Id")  // Replace with placeholder
        .ScrubMember("CreatedAt");
}

Output:

{
  Id: Guid_1,
  CreatedAt: DateTime_1,
  Total: 99.99
}

Global Scrubbing

Configure in ModuleInitializer:

[ModuleInitializer]
public static void Init()
{
    VerifierSettings.ScrubMembersWithType<DateTime>();
    VerifierSettings.ScrubMembersWithType<DateTimeOffset>();
    VerifierSettings.ScrubMembersWithType<Guid>();

    // Scrub specific patterns
    VerifierSettings.AddScrubber(s =>
        Regex.Replace(s, @"token=[a-zA-Z0-9]+", "token=SCRUBBED"));
}

---

File Organization

Recommended Structure

tests/
  MyApp.Tests/
    Snapshots/           # All verified files
      EmailTests/
        WelcomeEmail.verified.html
        PasswordReset.verified.html
      ApiTests/
        GetUser.verified.txt
    EmailTests.cs
    ApiTests.cs
    ModuleInitializer.cs

.gitignore

# Verify - ignore received files (only commit verified)
*.received.*

.gitattributes

# Treat verified files as generated (collapse in PR diffs)
*.verified.txt linguist-generated=true
*.verified.html linguist-generated=true
*.verified.json linguist-generated=true

---

CI/CD Integration

Fail on Missing Verified Files

[ModuleInitializer]
public static void Init()
{
    // In CI, fail instead of launching diff tool
    if (Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("CI") == "true")
    {
        VerifyDiffPlex.UseDiffPlex(OutputType.Minimal);
        DiffRunner.Disabled = true;
    }
}

GitHub Actions

- name: Run tests
  run: dotnet test
  env:
    CI: true

- name: Upload snapshots on failure
  if: failure()
  uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
  with:
    name: snapshots
    path: |
      **/*.received.*
      **/*.verified.*

---

When to Use Snapshot Testing

Scenario	Use Snapshot Testing?	Why
Rendered HTML/emails	Yes	Catches visual regressions
API surfaces	Yes	Prevents accidental breaks
Serialization output	Yes	Validates wire format
Complex object graphs	Yes	Easier than manual assertions
Simple value checks	No	Use regular assertions
Business logic	No	Use explicit assertions
Performance tests	No	Use benchmarks

---

Best Practices

DO

// Use descriptive test names - they become file names
[Fact]
public Task UserRegistration_WithValidData_ReturnsConfirmation()

// Scrub dynamic values consistently
VerifierSettings.ScrubMembersWithType<Guid>();

// Use extension parameter for non-text content
await Verify(html, extension: "html");

// Keep verified files in source control
git add *.verified.*

DON'T

// Don't verify random/dynamic data without scrubbing
var order = new Order { Id = Guid.NewGuid() };  // Fails every run!
await Verify(order);

// Don't commit .received files
git add *.received.*  // Wrong!

// Don't use for simple assertions
await Verify(result.Count);  // Just use Assert.Equal(5, result.Count)

---

Integration with MJML Email Testing

See the aspnetcore/transactional-emails skill for the complete pattern:

1. MJML templates with {{variable}} placeholders
2. Render to HTML with test data
3. Snapshot test the rendered output
4. Review changes in diff tool before approving

This catches:

• Broken variable substitution
• CSS/layout regressions
• Email client compatibility issues
• Unintended content changes

---

Resources

• Verify GitHub: https://github.com/VerifyTests/Verify
• Verify.Xunit: https://github.com/VerifyTests/Verify.Xunit
• ApiApprover: https://github.com/JakeGinnivan/ApiApprover
• DiffPlex Integration: https://github.com/VerifyTests/Verify.DiffPlex