negotiation-support

name	negotiation-support
language	en
description	Generates a strategic negotiation support document with leverage analysis, BATNA assessment, risk matrix, and issue-by-issue tactical planning. Use when preparing for settlement conferences, mediations, contract negotiations, deal structuring, or dispute resolution strategy sessions.
tags	["analysis","memo","litigation","transactional"]

Negotiation Support

Strategic negotiation roadmap synthesizing case materials into leverage analysis, risk assessment, and tactical recommendations.

Prerequisites

1. Matter context — parties, relationship history, negotiation type (settlement / contract / transactional / dispute resolution)
2. Documents — contracts, correspondence, prior agreements, discovery, financials
3. Client objectives — goals, constraints, authority limits, timeline
4. Negotiation history — prior offers, counteroffers, impasses, tentative agreements

Quick Start

1. Gather prerequisites above.
2. Produce each output section in order (Executive Summary through Action Items).
3. Cite source documents for every factual claim.
4. Mark unconfirmed legal authority with [VERIFY].
5. Label the document as privileged work product.

Output Structure

1. Executive Summary

Element	Content
Negotiation type	Settlement / contract / transactional / dispute resolution
Parties	Names, roles, relationship summary
Core objectives	Client's 3–5 primary goals, ranked
Critical issues	Top issues driving negotiation
Recommended strategy	Integrative vs. distributive; approach in 2–3 sentences
Key recommendation	Single most important strategic action

2. Factual Background

Chronological narrative with cited sources covering:

• Relationship history and negotiation genesis
• Key dates, amounts, communications, commitments
• Prior negotiation attempts and outcomes
• Current procedural posture or deal status

3. Interests & Positions Analysis

	Client	Opposing Party
Stated positions	What they demand	What they demand
Underlying interests	Economic, operational, reputational, relational	Same categories (estimated)
Constraints	Authority, timeline, regulatory	Likely constraints
Priorities	Rank order of issues	Estimated rank order
Pressure points	Internal deadlines, stakeholder demands	Likely pressures

4. Leverage Assessment

Rate each factor High / Medium / Low for both sides:

Leverage Type	Client	Opposing Party
Legal — claims strength, precedent, contractual position
Economic — resources, market position, alternatives
Informational — asymmetric knowledge, discovery exposure
Timing — deadlines, limitations periods, market windows
Relational — ongoing relationship value, reputation

5. BATNA Analysis

	Client	Opposing Party (est.)
Best alternative
Likely outcome if no deal
Cost of no deal
Timeline of alternative
Risks of alternative
Reservation point	Minimum acceptable	Estimated walk-away
Target outcome	Aspirational realistic goal

6. Risk Matrix

Risk	Type	Likelihood	Impact	Mitigation
	Legal / Business / Strategic	H/M/L	H/M/L	Specific action

Flag categories: litigation exposure, regulatory concerns, contractual weaknesses, reputational damage, precedent-setting risk, relationship damage.

7. Issue-by-Issue Plan

For each significant issue:

Issue	Opening	Target	Walk-Away	Value to Us	Value to Them
				H/M/L	H/M/L

Identify for each issue:

• Trade opportunities — low-cost concessions that are high-value to the other side
• Package proposals — bundled combinations that create value
• Sequencing — optimal order to address issues

8. Tactical Recommendations

Approach: integrative vs. distributive rationale, anchoring strategy, concession pattern (graduated / reciprocal / contingent), framing.

Anticipated arguments & responses:

Opposing Argument	Response	Supporting Authority / Facts
		Cite documents, precedent, statutory provisions

Process recommendations:

• Confidentiality protocol (NDA, FRE 408 / settlement privilege)
• Stakeholder involvement and escalation triggers
• Documentation protocol for offers and tentative agreements
• Expert input needs (financial, technical, industry)

9. Action Items

Action	Owner	Deadline	Priority
Pre-session preparations
Information to gather
Stakeholder decisions needed
Analysis to complete

Include negotiation timeline with milestones.

Guidelines

• Candid assessment — acknowledge weaknesses; do not overstate leverage.
• Cite sources — tie every factual claim to specific materials reviewed.
• Jurisdiction-aware — flag rules affecting negotiation (FRE 408, state settlement privilege, mandatory mediation).
• Confidentiality — mark as privileged work product; note attorney-client privilege applicability.
• Actionable specificity — tailor every recommendation to the matter facts; no generic advice.
• Authority verification — mark unconfirmed authority with [VERIFY].
• Living document — revise as new information emerges during negotiation.

Troubleshooting

• Missing client authority limits: Flag gap and request before drafting BATNA reservation points.
• Sparse opposing-party information: Mark estimated fields explicitly; recommend discovery or informal information-gathering steps.
• Multi-party negotiation: Duplicate the Interests & Leverage tables per party; note coalition dynamics.
• Cross-jurisdictional matters: Identify each jurisdiction's settlement privilege rules separately; flag conflicts.

---