Design Orchestration (Meta-Skill) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Orchestrates design workflows by routing work through brainstorming, multi-agent review, and execution readiness in the correct order and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
Design Orchestration (Meta-Skill) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Orchestrates design workflows by routing work through brainstorming, multi-agent review, and execution readiness in the correct order and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/design-orchestration from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Design Orchestration (Meta-Skill)
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Purpose, Operating Model, Controlled Skills, Entry Conditions, Routing Logic, Exit Conditions.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Orchestrates design workflows by routing work through brainstorming, multi-agent review, and execution readiness in the correct order.
Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
Use when copied upstream references, examples, or scripts materially improve the answer.
Use when the workflow should remain reviewable in the public intake repo before the private enhancer takes over.
Operating Table
Situation
Start here
Why it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path before touching the copied workflow
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
SKILL.md
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
SKILL.md
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Purpose
Ensure that ideas become designs, designs are reviewed, and
only validated designs reach implementation.
This skill does not generate designs.
It controls the flow between other skills.
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @design-orchestration to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @design-orchestration against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @design-orchestration for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @design-orchestration using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
Do NOT allow implementation without a validated design
Do NOT allow skipping required review
Do NOT allow silent escalation or de-escalation
Do NOT merge design and implementation phases
Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
Imported Operating Notes
Imported: Enforcement Rules
Do NOT allow implementation without a validated design
Do NOT allow skipping required review
Do NOT allow silent escalation or de-escalation
Do NOT merge design and implementation phases
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/design-orchestration, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Load only the files that materially change the answer, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better.
Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
@conductor-validator - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@confluence-automation - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@content-creator - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@content-marketer - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
Resource family
What it gives the reviewer
Example path
references
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream
references/n/a
examples
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream
examples/n/a
scripts
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation
scripts/n/a
agents
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package
agents/n/a
assets
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package
assets/n/a
Imported Reference Notes
Imported: Operating Model
This is a routing and enforcement skill, not a creative one.
It decides:
which skill must run next
whether escalation is required
whether execution is permitted
Imported: Controlled Skills
This meta-skill coordinates the following:
brainstorming — design generation
multi-agent-brainstorming — design validation
downstream implementation or planning skills
Imported: Entry Conditions
Invoke this skill when:
a user proposes a new feature, system, or change
a design decision carries meaningful risk
correctness matters more than speed
Imported: Routing Logic
Step 1 — Brainstorming (Mandatory)
If no validated design exists:
Invoke brainstorming
Require:
Understanding Lock
Initial Design
Decision Log started
You may NOT proceed without these artifacts.
Step 2 — Risk Assessment
After brainstorming completes, classify the design as:
Only critique, revision, and decision resolution are allowed.
Step 5 — Execution Readiness Check
Before allowing implementation:
Confirm:
design is approved (single-agent or multi-agent)
Decision Log is complete
major assumptions are documented
known risks are acknowledged
If any condition fails:
block execution
return to the appropriate skill
Imported: Exit Conditions
This meta-skill exits ONLY when:
the next step is explicitly identified, AND
all required prior steps are complete
Possible exits:
“Proceed to implementation planning”
“Run multi-agent-brainstorming”
“Return to brainstorming for clarification”
"If a reviewed design reports a final disposition of APPROVED, REVISE, or REJECT, you MUST route the workflow accordingly and state the chosen next step explicitly."
Imported: Design Philosophy
This skill exists to:
slow down the right decisions
speed up the right execution
prevent costly mistakes
Good systems fail early.
Bad systems fail in production.
This meta-skill exists to enforce the former.
Imported: Limitations
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
