| name | hidden-city-strategy |
| description | Use when user explicitly asks about hidden city ticketing, skiplagging, or throwaway ticketing. Requires explicit consent before analysis. Triggers on hidden city, skiplag, get off at layover. |
Hidden City Strategy - Chiến Lược Vé Hidden City
Purpose
Hidden city ticketing means buying a ticket to city C (cheaper) but getting off at city B (your actual destination), which is a layover on the way to city C. This skill provides NEUTRAL analysis - it doesn't encourage or discourage the practice. It gives you complete information to make your own informed decision.
Critical Design Principles
ETHICAL GUARDRAILS:
- This skill NEVER auto-recommends hidden city booking
- This skill ALWAYS requires explicit human consent before showing analysis
- This skill ALWAYS presents full risk disclosure before savings data
- Final decision is ALWAYS the user's responsibility
Input Required
- Route (origin → actual destination)
- Flight options from flight-search
- Traveler profile (baggage, loyalty, corporate card)
Execution Steps
Step 1: Consent Gate
Before ANY analysis, ask:
⚠️ HIDDEN CITY TICKETING ANALYSIS
Hidden city ticketing violates airline contracts of carriage.
It is not illegal, but airlines enforce penalties including:
- Account suspension
- Mileage forfeiture
- Future ticket cancellation
- Potential fare difference charges
Do you want to proceed with this analysis?
This decision is entirely yours. [Yes / No]
If No → Stop. Suggest alternatives (route-optimization for hub-based savings).
Step 2: Eligibility Gate (Must ALL pass)
Check these conditions BEFORE running savings analysis:
| # | Condition | Required | Why |
|---|
| 1 | No checked baggage | ✅ MUST | Checked bags route to final destination |
| 2 | No frequent flyer number on booking | ✅ MUST | Airlines track by FF account |
| 3 | No corporate travel card | ✅ MUST | Corporate accounts get flagged faster |
| 4 | One-way ticket only | ✅ MUST | Round-trip: missing leg 1 cancels return |
| 5 | No corporate travel policy prohibiting | ✅ MUST | Policy violation = disciplinary action |
| 6 | No connecting flight after hidden city | ✅ MUST | Missing first leg kills all subsequent |
| 7 | Non-frequent route (not weekly) | ⚠️ WARN | Patterns trigger detection |
Output if any condition fails:
❌ ELIGIBILITY CHECK FAILED
Condition failed: #4 - Round-trip booking
Reason: If you don't board the HAN→SFO→LAX segment,
the airline cancels your LAX→SFO→HAN return.
This means hidden city is NOT viable for your itinerary.
ALTERNATIVE: Consider route-optimization skill for hub-based
savings that don't carry these risks.
Step 3: Savings Analysis (only if eligible)
Compare:
Direct ticket: HAN → SFO = $750
Hidden city ticket: HAN → SFO → LAX = $520 (you exit at SFO)
Gross savings: $230 (31%)
But factor in costs of hidden city:
Net savings calculation:
Gross savings: $230
- Travel insurance (recommended): -$30
- One-way ticket premium: -$0 (sometimes one-ways cost more)
- Risk-adjusted penalty cost: -$X (see Step 4)
= Net expected savings: $200 (estimated)
Step 4: Risk Assessment by Airline
Read references/enforcement-levels.md for current enforcement data.
Present airline-specific risk:
ENFORCEMENT RISK: United Airlines
Level: HIGH 🔴
- AI detection system launched 2025 for skiplag detection
- Actively tracks passengers who don't board final segments
- Known to charge fare difference retroactively
- Frequent flyer account at risk of suspension
- Delta dedicating resources at Atlanta hub specifically
If caught: Fare difference charge ($230+), possible account ban
Probability of detection: MODERATE-HIGH for this route
Step 5: Full Risk Disclosure
Present ALL risks in clear format:
COMPLETE RISK DISCLOSURE
✅ What goes right (best case):
You save $230 and nobody notices.
⚠️ What could go wrong:
1. Gate agent notices and re-routes you to LAX
2. Airline charges fare difference ($230+) retroactively
3. Frequent flyer account suspended (if accidentally linked)
4. Future bookings on this airline scrutinized
5. If flight diverts/cancels, you're rebooked to LAX, not SFO
6. Carry-on could be gate-checked to LAX at busy gate
🔴 Worst case:
Airline bans you from future bookings + charges premium fare
+ forfeits any miles in your account
💡 Mitigations:
- Use airline's website directly (OTAs may flag unusual patterns)
- Don't add frequent flyer number
- Arrive early, board early (avoid gate-check of carry-on)
- Have backup plan if flight is cancelled/rerouted
Step 6: Decision Framework
Don't recommend - present framework for user to decide:
DECISION MATRIX
Hidden City Direct Booking
Cost: $520 $750
Savings: $230 (31%) Baseline
Risk level: HIGH (United) None
Baggage: Carry-on only Any
Rebooking if delay: To LAX (wrong) To SFO (correct)
Miles earned: None (risky) Full earning
Insurance: Recommended (+$30) Standard
YOUR CALL: Given these trade-offs, the decision is entirely yours.
This skill has presented neutral information.
We do not recommend for or against this strategy.
References
references/enforcement-levels.md - Airline-by-airline enforcement data
references/eligibility-check.md - Detailed eligibility conditions
Important Notes
- Hidden city ticketing is explicitly prohibited in airline Contracts of Carriage
- It is NOT illegal (no law prohibits it), but it IS a contract violation
- Airlines have successfully sued travel agencies (not individuals) promoting it
- Skiplagged.com lawsuit was dismissed but demonstrates airline hostility
- Frequency of use increases detection risk dramatically
- This skill exists for informational purposes only