| name | prompt-review |
| description | Audits a candidate prompt (.prompt.md) against five gates (spec compliance, content quality, scope fit, safety, currency & coherence). Use when reviewing a new prompt draft before commit, evaluating a Mall prompt or store prompt for adoption, or re-auditing existing prompts on a periodic cadence. |
| lastReviewed | "2026-05-31T00:00:00.000Z" |
Prompt Review
Audit a candidate prompt against the five-gate contract. Prompts are workflow entry points — short, imperative, single-goal. No optional Gate 6 (prompts are short by nature; no scaling concern Gates 1–5 miss).
When to Use
Three fire contexts:
- Author self-audit — dogfood your own draft before committing. Invoked from prompt-creator Phase 7.
- External candidate adoption — gate before pulling a Mall prompt or store prompt into this brain.
- Periodic re-audit — re-check existing prompts on a cadence (e.g., quarterly retraining).
The shared gate model lives in skill-review/SKILL.md § The Five Gates. This file documents the prompt-specific criteria for each gate.
A mechanical validator (e.g., a brain-qa script that ships with the heir) typically checks Gate 1 frontmatter compliance and the mechanical subset of Gate 5. Gates 2–5 are judgment-only.
The Five Gates
A candidate must pass all five to ship. Failure on any gate = decline or revise.
Gate 1 — Spec Compliance
| Check | Pass criterion |
|---|
| Frontmatter present AND minimal | description + lastReviewed. Reject any of: name, type, application, tier, currency, inheritance, lifecycle, user-invokable, evidence. |
mode: field handling | Per current Microsoft Learn prompt-files spec, mode: agent is deprecated. Existing prompts may carry it during sweep transition; new prompts should not introduce it. Flag as Gate 1 fail if a new prompt adds mode:. |
description valid | Third-person, ≤1024 chars, names what the prompt does AND when to invoke it (slash-command UX). |
| Filename pattern | <kebab-name>.prompt.md in .github/prompts/ (flat — no subfolders) |
| Markdown lints clean | No broken links, no missing code-fence languages |
Gate 2 — Content Quality
| Check | Pass criterion |
|---|
| Imperative voice | Verbs in the imperative ("Run X", "Read Y", "Apply Z"). Prompts are commands to the agent, not explanations. |
| Single workflow scope | One goal per prompt. If the title contains "and" or "+", split. Prompts that are menus of unrelated commands fail this gate. |
| Numbered steps | The prompt's body is a numbered step list. Brief context paragraph allowed before the steps; nothing else. |
Has ## Would Revise If OR justification for omission | Prompts under 30 lines may inline the falsifier; longer prompts must have an explicit section per your heir's falsifiability-deadlines discipline. |
| ≤100 lines | Soft target. Long prompts signal that the workflow belongs in a skill; the prompt should just invoke the skill. |
Gate 3 — Scope Fit
| Check | Pass criterion |
|---|
| Workflow entry-point, not workflow body | The prompt invokes a skill (or runs a short coordinated sequence). The skill carries the procedure; the prompt is the front door. |
| Not redundant with existing prompt | Grep description: across .github/prompts/ — if another prompt covers the same workflow, extend that one. |
| Discoverable as slash-command | The prompt's name (filename without .prompt.md) is something a user would intuitively type after /. /review-instruction good; /v2-thing-do bad. |
| Lives in the right brain | Generic developer workflows → heir baseline. Project-specific workflows → that project's local repo. |
Gate 4 — Safety
Same criteria as skill-review § Gate 4. Prompt-specific note: prompts that invoke destructive operations (force-push, drop, delete) must include an explicit user-confirmation step before the destructive call.
Gate 5 — Currency & Coherence
Same criteria as skill-review § Gate 5. Prompt-specific note: the prompt must reference live skills/instructions in its steps. A prompt that calls a retired skill is a Gate 5 failure even if the prompt itself is well-written.
Decision Matrix
| Gates passed | Action |
|---|
| All 5 | Accept — land the change |
| 4 of 5 | Revise — name the failing gate and patch the candidate |
| ≤3 of 5 | Decline — name the rationale; if the decline sets precedent, record it where your heir tracks framework-level decisions |
Recording the Verdict
For self-audits and routine re-audits: the verdict lives in the commit message or the conversation. No separate file.
For external adoption (Mall prompt, store prompt) or any decline that sets precedent: write a verdict capturing gate results, rationale, required changes (if Revise), and the act-pass trail. Store wherever your heir keeps audit decisions.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-pattern | Correction |
|---|
| Accepting a prompt that carries the workflow inline instead of invoking a skill | If the prompt has more than the step list, the workflow belongs in a skill |
Letting mode: agent ship on a new prompt | Per Microsoft Learn current spec, deprecated. Flag at Gate 1. |
| Accepting "menu" prompts that bundle unrelated commands | One workflow per prompt. Multi-purpose prompts confuse the slash-picker. |
| Skipping the slash-picker discoverability check | Filename = user typing. If the name is cryptic, the prompt won't get found. |
| Prompt references a retired skill | Gate 5 semantic failure. Check the Steps: block resolves to live artifacts. |
Falsifiability
This skill's prompt-specific criteria have failed if any of the following occur within 90 days:
- An accepted prompt is reported broken (workflow doesn't fire, or fires wrong) by 2+ heirs
- Gate 2 ≤100 lines threshold is reversed ≥3 times for legitimate complex workflows (ceiling too tight)
- Prompts accepted via this skill are typed via slash-picker <50% of the time when applicable (discoverability criterion miscalibrated)
Track as you would any falsified discipline (commit log, retraining notes, or curation ledger if your repo ships one) tagged [PROMPT-REVIEW-MISS].
Related
