skill-building

name	Skill Building
description	Create effective, reusable skills from real-world experience for promotion to Master Alex
applyTo	**/*skill*,**/*SKILL*,**/skills/**

Skill Building

Create effective, reusable skills from real-world experience

Meta-skill for heirs to build high-quality skills that can be promoted to Master Alex.

---

When to Use

• After completing a project with reusable learnings
• When you've discovered gotchas worth documenting
• When patterns are ready to be promoted to Master
• When creating new domain expertise from scratch

---

The Skill Creation Workflow

Phase 1: Wait for Validation

Never create skills from theory. Wait for:

✅ Ready Signal	❌ Too Early
Project shipped/deployed	Still designing
Bug discovered and fixed	Theoretical solution
Pattern used 3+ times	First attempt
Gotcha encountered	Guessing at edge cases

A skill written after successful delivery is worth 10x one written from theory.

Phase 2: Define Scope

Answer these questions first:

1. What problem does this skill solve? (1 sentence)
2. What are the key gotchas? (list 3-5)
3. What would I tell a colleague? (elevator pitch)
4. Does this already exist? (check skill catalog)

Scope Check:

Scope	Symptom	Action
Too broad	"Everything about X"	Split into multiple skills
Too narrow	Only one use case	Merge into related skill
Just right	Clear boundaries, multiple uses	Proceed

Phase 3: Create the Skill

Folder Structure:

.github/skills/{skill-name}/
├── SKILL.md          # Required: Main content
├── synapses.json     # Optional: Brain connections
└── {assets}          # Optional: Templates, CSS, scripts

Naming Convention:

Pattern	Examples
{domain}-{sub}	azure-architecture-patterns, api-design
{tool}-{purpose}	markdown-mermaid, sharp-cli
{action}-{context}	debugging-patterns, error-recovery

---

SKILL.md Template

---
applyTo: "{glob-patterns}"
---

# {Skill Name}

> {One-line description — what + who}

{2-3 sentence intro with context}

---

## When to Use

- {Primary use case}
- {Secondary use case}
- {Edge case that surprised you}

---

## Quick Reference

{Most important info — tables, cheat sheets, one-liners}

---

## {Module 1: Core Concept}

{Main content organized by topic}

### {Sub-section}

{Details, patterns, examples}

---

## {Module N: Advanced}

{Progressive disclosure — basics first, advanced later}

---

## Troubleshooting

### {Problem Title}

**Problem**: {What goes wrong}

**Solution**: {How to fix it}

**Why**: {Root cause for learning}

---

## Activation Patterns

| Trigger | Response |
|---------|----------|
| "{keyword}" | Full skill activation |
| "{partial keyword}" | {Specific module} |

---

*Skill created: {date} | Category: {category} | Status: Active*

---

## Synapses

- [{related-skill}/SKILL.md] ({Strength}, {Type}, {Direction}) - "{When}"
- [{related-instructions}.md] ({Strength}, {Type}, {Direction}) - "{When}"

---

applyTo Patterns

Choose patterns that match when this skill should activate:

Pattern	When to Use	Example Skills
**/*.{ext}	File-type specific	typescript-patterns
**/*{keyword}*	Name-based activation	markdown-mermaid
**/test*	Context-based	testing-strategies
src/**	Location-based	frontend-patterns

Common Combinations:

# Documentation skills
applyTo: "**/*.md,**/readme*,**/docs/**"

# TypeScript skills  
applyTo: "**/*.ts,**/*.tsx,**/tsconfig*"

# Azure skills
applyTo: "**/azure*,**/bicep*,**/arm*,**/*.bicep"

# Broad activation (use sparingly)
applyTo: "**/*"

---

Synapse Guidelines

When to Add Synapses

Connection Type	When	Example
Enables	This skill makes another possible	slide-design → dissertation-defense
Enhances	This skill improves another	coaching → executive-storytelling
Requires	This skill depends on another	citation → literature-review
Extends	This skill adds to another	airs-appropriate-reliance → appropriate-reliance

Strength Values

Strength	Meaning	Use When
Critical (0.95-1.0)	Always co-activate	Core dependencies
High (0.8-0.94)	Usually co-activate	Strong relationships
Medium (0.6-0.79)	Sometimes co-activate	Contextual connections
Low (0.4-0.59)	Rarely co-activate	Weak associations

Direction Types

Direction	Meaning	Symbol
Forward	I help them	→
Bidirectional	Mutual benefit	↔
Backward	They help me	←

Format:

- [.github/skills/{skill}/SKILL.md] (High, Enables, Bidirectional) - "When X happens"

---

Quality Checklist

Before promoting to Master, verify:

Content Quality

• Validated: Based on real-world experience, not theory
• Gotchas included: Hard-won lessons documented
• Actionable: Reader can immediately apply
• Examples: Code/patterns are concrete, not abstract

Structure Quality

• Quick Reference: Most useful info first
• Progressive disclosure: Basics → Advanced
• Troubleshooting: Common problems solved
• Activation patterns: Clear triggers defined

Integration Quality

• applyTo set: Appropriate glob patterns
• Synapses defined: 2-5 meaningful connections
• No duplication: Doesn't overlap with existing skills
• Keywords identified: For memory-activation index

---

Promotion Readiness Score

Calculate before requesting Master promotion:

Criterion	Points	Your Score
Has applyTo frontmatter	+2
Has Synapses section	+3
Has Troubleshooting	+2
Has code examples	+2
Content > 100 lines	+1
Content > 200 lines	+2
Uses generic terms (not project-specific)	+1-3
Has Activation Patterns	+1
Total		/16

Promotion thresholds:

• ≥12: Ready for Master
• 8-11: Needs refinement
• <8: Keep developing

---

Recognizing Shallow vs Deep Content

The biggest failure mode in skill creation is the capabilities-list anti-pattern — a skill that reads like a product brochure instead of encoding real knowledge.

The Capabilities-List Anti-Pattern

# ❌ SHALLOW — adds zero value
Expert in domain-agnostic knowledge acquisition.

## Capabilities
- Guide conversational knowledge acquisition
- Create skill files
- Build expertise through progressive questioning

## When to Use
- User wants to learn something new
- Teaching Alex about a domain

Why this fails: An LLM already knows how to "guide conversational learning" generically. The skill adds nothing the model didn't already have. It's a capability label, not capability knowledge.

What Deep Looks Like

# ✅ DEEP — encodes specific, actionable knowledge

## Phase 2: Foundation — Nail the core concepts

- Ask for the simplest possible explanation of each concept
- Demand concrete examples, not abstractions
- Test understanding by explaining it back
- **Red flag**: If the explanation uses jargon from the same domain, you haven't bottomed out

**Exit criteria**: Can explain core concepts without jargon.

Depth Assessment Rubric

Signal	Shallow	Deep
Opening line	"Expert in X" / "Capabilities:"	Specific insight or principle
Tables	Category labels only	Real data: thresholds, trade-offs, examples
Sections	"When to Use" / "Input/Output"	Domain-specific knowledge modules
Advice	Generic ("be careful")	Specific ("timeout after 30s because...")
Examples	None or abstract	Concrete, copy-pasteable, with context
Anti-patterns	Not mentioned	Named, explained, with alternatives

The Litmus Test

For each section, ask: "Would an LLM produce something equally useful without this skill?"

• If yes → the section is shallow, rewrite or remove it
• If no → the section earns its place

---

Trifecta Decision Framework

A trifecta = SKILL.md (declarative) + .instructions.md (procedural) + .prompt.md (interactive). Not every skill needs one.

When to Build a Trifecta

Signal	Needs Trifecta?	Why
Skill describes a multi-step workflow	Yes	Steps need procedural memory (.instructions.md)
Users need guided conversation	Yes	Interactive workflow needs episodic memory (.prompt.md)
Skill is reference knowledge only	No	Table lookups don't need procedures
Process is already covered by another trifecta	No	Avoid duplication
Skill is used frequently + is error-prone	Yes	High value from step-by-step guidance
Skill is domain expertise (patterns, anti-patterns)	No	SKILL.md alone is the right memory type

Trifecta Components — What Goes Where

Component	Memory Type	Contains	Example
SKILL.md	Declarative ("what")	Domain knowledge, tables, thresholds, patterns	testing-strategies: pyramid, mock rules, coverage philosophy
.instructions.md	Procedural ("how")	Step-by-step process, decision points, checkpoints	release-management: version bump → changelog → build → publish
.prompt.md	Episodic ("interact")	Guided conversation, user Q&A, session templates	/learn: Socratic learning flow

Rule: If the skill's value is in its reference data (tables, thresholds, patterns), a SKILL.md alone is correct. Only add procedures/prompts when there's a genuine process to guide.

Building the Trifecta

1. Start with SKILL.md — always create the declarative knowledge first
2. Observe usage — is there a repeatable process emerging?
3. Add .instructions.md — when you can write numbered steps with decision points
4. Add .prompt.md — when users need an interactive guided experience
5. Register in catalogs — update TRIFECTA-CATALOG.md

---

Muscle Assessment

A muscle is an execution script in .github/muscles/ — the motor cortex of the architecture. Scripts, not memory.

When to Create a Muscle

Signal	Create Muscle?	Example
Same terminal commands run repeatedly	Yes	brain-qa.ps1 — synapse validation
File validation that could be automated	Yes	validate-skills.ps1 — schema checking
Multi-file transformations	Yes	sync-architecture.js — heir sync
Decision-making that requires judgment	No	Code review (that's a skill, not a script)
Creative work	No	Writing (LLM does this, not a script)
One-time operation	No	Not worth automating

Muscle Naming Convention

Pattern	Example	What It Does
{verb}-{noun}.ps1	validate-synapses.ps1	PowerShell validation
{verb}-{noun}.js	sync-architecture.js	Node.js transformation
{noun}-{noun}.ps1	brain-qa.ps1	PowerShell audit

Muscle + Trifecta Integration

A muscle is referenced by a trifecta but is never a memory component itself:

SKILL.md          → "What to check" (knowledge)
.instructions.md  → "Step 5: Run brain-qa.ps1" (procedure)
.prompt.md        → "Shall I run the health check?" (interaction)
brain-qa.ps1      → Actually runs the check (execution)

---

Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't	✅ Do Instead
Write skill before project starts	Ship first, document after
Copy-paste from docs	Add your insights and gotchas
Create single-use skills	Wait for 3+ use cases
Skip synapses	Connect to 2-5 related skills
Use project-specific names	Generalize (MyAppConfig → config patterns)
Mega-skill (1000+ lines)	Split into focused skills
Orphan skill (no connections)	Always connect to network
Write capabilities lists	Encode real domain knowledge
Build trifecta for reference skills	SKILL.md alone for lookup knowledge
Create muscle for one-time tasks	Only automate repeating operations

---

Examples: Good vs Bad

❌ Bad Skill Start

# My Azure Function

> How I built my Azure Function

## Setup
1. Created function app
2. Added my config...

Problems: Project-specific, no reusability, no patterns

✅ Good Skill Start

# Azure Functions Patterns

> Production patterns for serverless Azure development

## When to Use
- HTTP-triggered APIs
- Event-driven processing
- Scheduled jobs

## Quick Reference

| Trigger | Use When | Gotcha |
|---------|----------|--------|
| HTTP | API endpoints | Cold start 5-10s |
| Timer | Scheduled jobs | UTC timezone only |
...

Why better: General patterns, table for quick reference, gotchas included

---

Skill Consolidation (KISS Merge)

When related skills exist, merge rather than proliferate:

When to Merge

• 2+ skills serve same domain
• Skills would always be used together
• Content overlap > 30%

Merge Process

1. Choose anchor: Most comprehensive skill
2. Absorb content: Move unique sections from others
3. Update synapses: Redirect connections to anchor
4. Archive sources: Keep in heir for history
5. Document merge: Note absorbed skills at bottom

Example:

*Skill created: 2026-02-10 | Category: Communication | Status: Active*
*Merged: stakeholder-management, meeting-efficiency*

---

After Creation: Register with Memory-Activation

Add your skill to the action-keyword index:

Location: .github/skills/memory-activation/SKILL.md

Format:

| {skill-name} | {keyword1}, {keyword2}, {keyword3} |

Choose keywords that users would actually say:

• Action verbs: "create", "debug", "design"
• Domain terms: "azure", "mermaid", "citation"
• Problem phrases: "not working", "how to"

---

Synapses

• [.github/instructions/skill-building.instructions.md] (Critical, Implements, Forward) - "Step-by-step procedure for creating and completing skills"
• [.github/instructions/bootstrap-learning.instructions.md] (High, Enables, Bidirectional) - "Learning becomes skill"
• [.github/instructions/heir-skill-promotion.instructions.md] (Critical, Implements, Forward) - "Skill ready for promotion"
• [.github/skills/memory-activation/SKILL.md] (High, Integrates, Forward) - "Register for discovery"
• [.github/skills/skill-catalog-generator/SKILL.md] (Medium, Triggers, Forward) - "Regenerate catalog after creation"
• SYNAPSE-SCHEMA.md (High, References, Backward) - "Canonical synapse architecture reference"

---

Skill created: 2026-02-10 | Category: Meta-Skills | Status: Active