Skip to main content

fablize

A harness that makes Opus (or any Claude model) behave like Fable — it enforces seeing a task through to the end, with evidence and verification, as procedure. Use when starting a multi-step task (2+ sequential stories), long autonomous work, debugging or root-cause investigation, building render/executable artifacts (HTML, SVG, games, charts), or when the user says "fablize", "see it through", "verify as you go", "split into goals".

Datos de origen

Repositorio
fivetaku/fablize
Última actividad en el origen
6 de julio de 2026 a las 00:42
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
895
Forks
127

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
fablize
description
A harness that makes Opus (or any Claude model) behave like Fable — it enforces seeing a task through to the end, with evidence and verification, as procedure. Use when starting a multi-step task (2+ sequential stories), long autonomous work, debugging or root-cause investigation, building render/executable artifacts (HTML, SVG, games, charts), or when the user says "fablize", "see it through", "verify as you go", "split into goals".
# fablize — run Opus like Fable > Principle: a harness cannot raise a model's ceiling. It makes the model go all the way to its own ceiling — by enforcing verification, completion, and investigation as procedure. When the capability ceiling is the blocker (open-ended creative detail, self-driven discovery), escalate (§4). > > Apply only what the task signals (smallest matching discipline; overlap only when genuinely multi-category). When installed always-on, this routing is automatic. ## 0. First run — set up automatically (once) Before doing the requested task, check whether fablize has been onboarded on this machine: ```bash cat ~/.fablize/progress.json 2>/dev/null ``` - If the file **exists** — skip onboarding, go straight to the task. - If it is **missing** — onboard once with a single AskUserQuestion. **Phrase the question and options in the user's current conversation language** (detect it from recent messages — Korean, English, Japanese, etc.). - **Question (meaning, translate to the user's language):** "Set up fablize?" - **Options (meaning, translate):** "Local — this project only (recommended)" / "Global — all projects" / "Skip". - On **Local/Global** — run setup (it injects the block and writes progress.json; it never stars anything by itself), then continue with the task: ```bash bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/setup/setup.sh <local|global> ``` After setup, run `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/setup/setup.sh ask` — if it prints `STAR_ASK <lang>`, ask once via AskUserQuestion (in the user's language) whether they'd like to give the repo an optional GitHub ⭐, then run `setup.sh star yes` or `setup.sh star no` accordingly. If it prints nothing, skip silently. - On **Skip** — record it so it won't ask again, then continue: ```bash mkdir -p ~/.fablize && printf '{"setup_done":false,"skipped":true}' > ~/.fablize/progress.json ``` This means the user can just run `/fablize` (or trigger it) without running setup first — the first run onboards itself, once, with one question. ## 1. Multi-story loop (2+ sequential stories) Decompose into sequential stories and complete one at a time, producing evidence as you go. Self-contained — no external goal system required. Run from the repo root; state persists in `./.fablize/` (resume with `status` even across sessions). ```bash python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/goals.py create --brief "<summary>" \ --goal "title::verifiable objective" --goal "title::..." # the last goal must be a verification story python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/goals.py next # activate a story + handoff # ... work that story only ... python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/goals.py checkpoint --id G001 --status complete --evidence "<concrete evidence>" # the final story is a verification gate: --verify-cmd "<command>" --verify-evidence "<result>" are required python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/goals.py status # first command when resuming ``` Rules: `complete` requires non-empty evidence; the final goal cannot complete without a verify command and its result (the engine refuses). If blocked, record `--status blocked` and report. Single-step tasks skip this loop. ## 2. Deep investigation (debugging / unknown cause / review) Read and follow `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/packs/investigation-protocol.txt`: reproduce first → form 3+ competing hypotheses → gather evidence per hypothesis → trace the full causal chain (removing the symptom is not removing the defect) → verify before and after → report the hypotheses you rejected. For reviews, report everything including low-confidence findings and filter in a separate step. ## 3. Verification grounding (render/executable artifacts — always) For artifacts whose correctness only shows when run (HTML, SVG, games, UI, charts), follow `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/packs/verification-grounding-pack.txt`: run it in the real renderer → observe the actual output → fix what the observation reveals → re-run. A static parse confirms well-formed, not correct. ## 3-1. Working style (always) Lead with the outcome. Stay within the requested scope (no incidental refactors or abstractions). Ground every completion claim in a tool result from this session. Confirm before destructive or hard-to-reverse actions. ## 4. At the capability ceiling (escalate) Signals you have hit the model's ceiling: stuck on the same problem 2+ times; open-ended creation where detail itself is the value; deep review that needs out-of-spec discovery. These are capability, not procedure, and a harness cannot fill them. In order: (1) adaptive thinking already scales with difficulty — recommend `/effort xhigh` to the user to push the current model to its ceiling; (2) **reactive effort delegation** — if the blocker is a bounded, hard *slice* (not the whole task), delegate just that slice to a background Workflow with `effort:'max'` (model inherited): package the evidence (symptoms, attempts, failure point, repro, the specific sub-question) as the `agent()` prompt, force a structured return via `schema`, then resume with its result as authoritative. This is the only real per-task effort knob in a normal session — the Agent tool exposes `model` but no `effort`; only Workflow/Agent SDK do. **Opt-in, and not yet proven on real work** (the shadow layer in `docs/MEASUREMENT_PROTOCOL.md` measures whether it helps): use it for a genuinely stuck slice, not routinely, and **never trigger it from risk/deep classification alone** — that over-escalates simple high-risk tasks (false-escalate); (3) if still short, hand off to a stronger model in a fresh session with the same evidence package; (4) otherwise report the limit honestly and name where a human must step in. ## Install (always-on, optional) Run once: `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/setup/setup.sh` → choose local (recommended) or global. Uninstall: `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/setup/uninstall.sh`. The UserPromptSubmit router hook registers automatically when the plugin is installed.
Ver en GitHub