greptimedb-fuzz-ci-failure-investigation

name	greptimedb-fuzz-ci-failure-investigation
description	Investigate a failed GreptimeDB fuzz CI target link by downloading GitHub Actions job logs plus fuzz artifacts such as kind logs, monitor dumps, and CSV dumps, then correlate the failure with local GreptimeDB source code. Use when the user provides a failed fuzz CI target/job URL or asks to diagnose GreptimeDB fuzz CI failures.

GreptimeDB Fuzz CI Failure Investigation

Investigate failed fuzz-test jobs for GreptimeTeam/greptimedb from a local checkout. The purpose is to download the failed job's CI output and fuzz artifacts, then explain the likely cause by correlating the evidence with GreptimeDB source.

Always pass --repo GreptimeTeam/greptimedb to gh; local remotes may point to forks. Keep the workflow read-only: do not rerun jobs, cancel workflows, push, comment on PRs, or delete artifacts unless the user explicitly asks.

Scope

Use this skill for fuzz CI only. In .github/workflows/develop.yml, fuzz failures are the CI jobs that use .github/actions/fuzz-test:

• fuzztest — standalone fuzz targets.
• unstable-fuzztest — unstable standalone fuzz target.
• distributed-fuzztest — distributed cluster fuzz targets.
• distributed-fuzztest-with-chaos — distributed fuzz targets with Chaos Mesh.

Standalone fuzz jobs usually only provide the GitHub Actions job log, except unstable-fuzztest, which uploads the unstable-fuzz-logs artifact from /tmp/unstable-greptime/ on failure. Distributed fuzz jobs additionally export cluster artifacts on failure.

The reusable action .github/actions/fuzz-test/action.yaml runs:

cargo fuzz run <target> --fuzz-dir tests-fuzz -D -s none ... -- -max_total_time=<seconds>

Distributed fuzz jobs are the ones that export cluster artifacts. In the current workflow they upload these names on failure:

• fuzz-tests-kind-logs-${{ matrix.mode.name }}-${{ matrix.target }} from /tmp/kind after kind export logs /tmp/kind.
• fuzz-tests-monitor-dumps-${{ matrix.mode.name }}-${{ matrix.target }} from /tmp/fuzz-monitor-dumps, collected by .github/scripts/collect-fuzz-monitor-artifacts.sh.
• fuzz-tests-csv-dumps-${{ matrix.mode.name }}-${{ matrix.target }} from /tmp/greptime-fuzz-dumps for the non-chaos distributed fuzz job.

Example: for run 29000666156, job 86062894741, target fuzz_alter_table, and mode Remote WAL, the kind logs artifact is:

fuzz-tests-kind-logs-Remote WAL-fuzz_alter_table

Inputs

The normal user input is a CI target link: a GitHub Actions job URL for one failed matrix target. Treat that URL as the primary source of truth. Example:

https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb/actions/runs/29000666156/job/86062894741

Also accept these fallback inputs:

• A workflow run URL, e.g. https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb/actions/runs/29000666156.
• A run id plus a fuzz target, mode name, artifact name, PR, branch, or commit SHA.

Parse ids from URLs:

REPO=GreptimeTeam/greptimedb
RUN_ID=29000666156
JOB_ID=86062894741

When the input is a job URL, do not ask for the target name first. Use the job id to fetch metadata, then derive the target and mode from the job name. A distributed fuzz job name usually contains the CI target tuple:

Fuzz Test (Distributed, <mode>, <target>)
Fuzz Test with Chaos (Distributed, <mode>, <target>)

If only a run URL is provided, list failed jobs and choose the fuzz job matching the target/mode. Ask only when multiple fuzz jobs are plausible and there is no target, mode, artifact, or job-url clue.

Prerequisites

• gh must be installed and authenticated (gh auth status). Actions logs and artifacts commonly require authentication even for a public repo.
• jq, unzip, and standard shell tools are useful for reducing logs.
• Use the local GreptimeDB checkout for source analysis. If the run's head SHA is not the current checkout, inspect the code at the run's SHA before making claims.
• Use a scratch directory outside the source tree, such as /tmp/greptimedb-fuzz-ci.

1. Capture run and job metadata

Create a scratch directory:

mkdir -p /tmp/greptimedb-fuzz-ci/$RUN_ID
cd /tmp/greptimedb-fuzz-ci/$RUN_ID

Fetch run metadata:

gh run view "$RUN_ID" --repo "$REPO" \
  --json databaseId,name,displayTitle,event,headBranch,headSha,status,conclusion,createdAt,updatedAt,url,workflowName \
  > run.json

Fetch all jobs through the REST API:

gh api "repos/$REPO/actions/runs/$RUN_ID/jobs?per_page=100" \
  --paginate --jq '.jobs[]' \
  | jq -s '{jobs: .}' > jobs.json

List failed fuzz-like jobs:

jq -r '
  .jobs[]
  | select(.conclusion != null and .conclusion != "success")
  | select(.name | test("Fuzz Test|fuzz"; "i"))
  | [.id, .name, .status, .conclusion, .html_url] | @tsv
' jobs.json

For a known JOB_ID, capture job name and step outcomes:

jq -r --arg id "$JOB_ID" '
  .jobs[] | select((.id | tostring) == $id) |
  "job=\(.name) conclusion=\(.conclusion) url=\(.html_url)",
  (.steps[]? | [.number, .name, .status, .conclusion, .started_at, .completed_at] | @tsv)
' jobs.json > job-summary.txt

Record the fuzz job kind, matrix mode, target, failed step, event type, branch, and head SHA. Do not assume main for PR or merge-queue runs.

For the common job-link input, parse mode and target from the captured job name and use them to construct artifact names. If parsing is inconvenient, keep the raw job name and match artifacts by the target substring first, then by mode substring.

2. Download CI output for the failed job

Download the selected job's log; this is the authoritative target CI output for the cargo fuzz run command:

gh run view "$RUN_ID" --repo "$REPO" --job "$JOB_ID" --log > job-$JOB_ID.log

Download the full workflow log only when setup/build context matters:

gh run view "$RUN_ID" --repo "$REPO" --log > run-$RUN_ID.log

Fallback if gh run view --log is incomplete. The job logs endpoint returns a plain text stream, while the full run logs endpoint returns a zip archive:

gh api "repos/$REPO/actions/jobs/$JOB_ID/logs" > job-$JOB_ID.log
gh api "repos/$REPO/actions/runs/$RUN_ID/logs" > run-$RUN_ID-logs.zip
unzip -oq run-$RUN_ID-logs.zip -d run-logs

In the job log, inspect the Run Fuzz Test step first. Capture:

• exact target name;
• max_total_time;
• panic/assertion/backtrace or libFuzzer crash output;
• generated crash/reproducer path if printed;
• timeout or resource symptoms.

3. Find and download fuzz artifacts

List artifacts:

gh api "repos/$REPO/actions/runs/$RUN_ID/artifacts?per_page=100" \
  --paginate --jq '.artifacts[]' \
  | jq -s '{artifacts: .}' > artifacts.json
jq -r '.artifacts[] | [.id, .name, .expired, .size_in_bytes] | @tsv' artifacts.json

Derive the expected artifact names from the failed job name:

• Job name shape: Fuzz Test (Distributed, <mode>, <target>) or Fuzz Test with Chaos (Distributed, <mode>, <target>).
• Expected kind artifact: fuzz-tests-kind-logs-<mode>-<target>.
• Expected monitor artifact: fuzz-tests-monitor-dumps-<mode>-<target>.
• Expected CSV artifact: fuzz-tests-csv-dumps-<mode>-<target> when present.

For a CI target/job link, this derivation is mandatory: the job URL gives JOB_ID, jobs.json gives the full matrix job name, and the matrix job name gives <mode>/<target>. Do not rely on the user to provide the artifact name.

Download exact artifacts when possible:

ARTIFACT='fuzz-tests-kind-logs-Remote WAL-fuzz_alter_table'
gh run download "$RUN_ID" --repo "$REPO" --name "$ARTIFACT" --dir artifacts/"$ARTIFACT"

Fallback by artifact id:

ARTIFACT_ID=$(jq -r --arg name "$ARTIFACT" '.artifacts[] | select(.name == $name and (.expired | not)) | .id' artifacts.json | head -n 1)
if [ -z "$ARTIFACT_ID" ]; then
  echo "Artifact not found or expired: $ARTIFACT"
  exit 1
fi
gh api "repos/$REPO/actions/artifacts/$ARTIFACT_ID/zip" > artifact-$ARTIFACT_ID.zip
mkdir -p artifacts/"$ARTIFACT"
unzip -oq artifact-$ARTIFACT_ID.zip -d artifacts/"$ARTIFACT"

For distributed fuzz failures, download at least the matching kind logs. Also download matching monitor dumps and CSV dumps when available. Note expired or missing artifacts explicitly; retention is currently short (retention-days: 3).

4. Understand artifact contents

Kind logs come from kind export logs /tmp/kind and usually include Kubernetes state plus container logs. Prioritize:

• GreptimeDB component logs: frontend, datanode, metasrv, flownode, monitor.
• Kubernetes pod descriptions/events: restarts, OOMKilled, scheduling, image pull, volume, DNS, and network issues.
• External service logs: etcd, Kafka, Minio, Chaos Mesh, Kafka WAL helper.

Monitor dumps are collected by .github/scripts/collect-fuzz-monitor-artifacts.sh. They may include:

• state.log, sql.log, copy.log, port-forward.log;
• *.show_create_table.sql for _gt_logs and OpenTelemetry trace tables;
• parquet dumps for _gt_logs, opentelemetry_traces, opentelemetry_traces_operations, and opentelemetry_traces_services.

CSV dumps come from fuzz targets under /tmp/greptime-fuzz-dumps and can contain target-specific generated operations or state snapshots.

5. Build a layered diagnosis model

Before drilling into a specific error string, build a small macro-level model of the failure. This prevents overfitting on the loudest symptom, such as libFuzzer: deadly signal, Internal error, or a cleanup warning.

5.1 Create a failure timeline

Record the key timestamps in order:

• job start and setup steps;
• external dependencies ready, such as etcd, Kafka, Minio, and Chaos Mesh;
• GreptimeDB cluster ready;
• fuzz binary starts;
• first generated operation or SQL visible in the target log;
• first suspicious component log line;
• user-visible fuzz failure or panic;
• artifact collection and cleanup.

Use the timeline to classify the failure phase: setup, workload execution, storage/WAL/write path, query path, cleanup, or runner infrastructure.

5.2 Trace the error propagation chain

For distributed fuzz failures, identify the chain from outer symptom to inner cause candidate. Prefer this shape:

fuzz panic/assertion
  -> client-visible SQL/gRPC/HTTP error
  -> frontend or monitor error
  -> meta/datanode/flownode component error
  -> storage/WAL/object-store/Kafka/etcd/k8s dependency error

At each boundary, decide whether that layer produced the error or merely wrapped and forwarded a downstream error. Do not stop at wrapper errors unless there is no deeper evidence.

5.3 Investigate by component boundary

For distributed targets, scan evidence in this order unless the timeline points elsewhere:

1. fuzz target and generated operations;
2. frontend request handling and SQL/error response;
3. metasrv metadata/procedure/routing;
4. datanode/mito2/metric-engine region execution;
5. WAL, Kafka, object store, Minio, etcd, or other dependencies;
6. Kubernetes pod state, restarts, scheduling, DNS, network, and runner resource signals.

For each layer, answer two questions: "is this the first causal error?" and "is this layer producing or propagating the failure?"

5.4 Verify intended config against runtime behavior

When a failure appears configuration-related, compare all three levels before claiming a config did or did not take effect:

1. the workflow/action/Helm/YAML config at the tested SHA;
2. the actual pod/container runtime config or startup logs, if available;
3. the source path that consumes the config, including hard-coded defaults and library retry/backoff settings.

If a logged value differs from the expected config, explicitly state whether the config was not applied, was overridden by another layer, or refers to a different kind of timeout/retry/deadline.

5.5 Keep competing hypotheses until evidence rules them out

Before final classification, list at least two plausible causes and the evidence that supports or weakens each, for example:

• product bug;
• fuzz/test invalid assumption or missing wait;
• config not applied or overridden;
• dependency/infra flake;
• timeout, retry, or resource pressure.

Then choose the most likely cause and keep the confidence scoped. It is often valid to have high confidence in the observed error chain but only medium confidence in the ultimate cause category.

5.6 State what would disprove the diagnosis

Include one or two falsifiable checks, such as a same-SHA rerun, a fixed reproducer, a cross-target pattern in the same dependency mode, or one missing artifact/log that would change the conclusion.

6. Reduce evidence before reading source

Extract high-signal lines from job logs and artifacts:

grep -RInE '(^|[^[:alpha:]])(ERROR|Error|WARN|panic|panicked|FAILED|failure|timeout|Timeout|assert|backtrace|SIG[A-Z]+|OOMKilled|CrashLoopBackOff|ImagePullBackOff|libFuzzer|AddressSanitizer|UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer)' \
  job-$JOB_ID.log run-$RUN_ID.log job-logs run-logs artifacts 2>/dev/null > signals.txt

Then identify the first causal failure, not the last cleanup error. A typical order:

1. cargo fuzz run output in job-$JOB_ID.log.
2. GreptimeDB component logs around the same timestamp.
3. Kubernetes events/restarts/OOMs.
4. Monitor/CSV dumps that show the generated SQL or cluster state.

Avoid common mistakes:

• Do not blame cleanup errors after the fuzz failure.
• Do not treat expected retry warnings as root cause unless they align with the assertion, crash, or timeout.
• Do not assume an artifact is relevant only because it contains fuzz; match mode and target.
• Do not diagnose from current local main if the run used a different SHA.

7. Inspect the tested source revision

Read the tested SHA:

HEAD_SHA=$(jq -r '.headSha // empty' run.json)
if [ -z "$HEAD_SHA" ]; then
  echo "Error: HEAD_SHA is empty or null"
  exit 1
fi

UPSTREAM_REMOTE=$(git remote -v \
  | awk '/GreptimeTeam\/greptimedb(\.git)?\/?([[:space:]])/ { print $1; exit }')
UPSTREAM_REMOTE=${UPSTREAM_REMOTE:-origin}

git rev-parse --verify "$HEAD_SHA^{commit}" >/dev/null 2>&1 \
  || git fetch "$UPSTREAM_REMOTE" "$HEAD_SHA"

If local HEAD differs, inspect files at that SHA or create a temporary worktree:

git worktree add --detach /tmp/greptimedb-fuzz-ci/$RUN_ID/source "$HEAD_SHA"

Remove temporary worktrees after investigation with git worktree remove <path>. Never overwrite the user's current branch.

8. Map logs to GreptimeDB code

Start from concrete strings: fuzz target name, panic text, assertion message, error variant, SQL statement, or log message. Search/read the matching source at the run SHA.

Useful entry points:

• tests-fuzz/ — fuzz targets, operation generators, checkers, dump paths.
• .github/actions/fuzz-test/action.yaml — exact cargo fuzz invocation.
• .github/workflows/develop.yml — fuzz matrix and artifact upload names.
• .github/scripts/collect-fuzz-monitor-artifacts.sh — monitor dump contents.
• src/mito2/AGENTS.md — storage/WAL/region failures.
• src/metric-engine/AGENTS.md — metric/logical table failures.
• src/frontend/AGENTS.md — SQL/protocol/query orchestration failures.
• src/meta-srv/AGENTS.md — metadata/procedure/routing failures.
• src/flow/AGENTS.md — flow failures.

When reporting code evidence, cite the file/function/line and quote the log line that reaches it. Separate confirmed facts from hypotheses.

9. Classify the cause

Use this taxonomy:

• Product bug: GreptimeDB panics, returns wrong results, loses data, or violates invariants under generated fuzz operations.
• Fuzz/test bug: the fuzz target/generator/checker makes an invalid assumption or fails to wait for an asynchronous condition it requires.
• Flake/race: timing/order/resource issue, usually supported by timeouts, retries, pod restarts, or prior similar failures.
• Environment/infra: runner disk/OOM, Docker/kind, network, dependency install, Kafka/Minio/etcd startup, or GitHub service issue.
• Unknown: logs/artifacts are expired or evidence conflicts.

10. Final response format

Use this structure:

## Summary
- Likely cause: <one sentence>
- Confidence: high|medium|low
- Classification: product bug|fuzz/test bug|flake/race|environment/infra|unknown
- Confidence basis: <which parts are confirmed vs inferred>

## Evidence
- `<job log or artifact path>`: quoted line(s)
- `<source-file:line>`: relevant code path

## Reasoning
<short chain from fuzz target -> CI output -> artifact logs -> source code>

## Alternative hypotheses
- <hypothesis>: <supporting and weakening evidence>
- <hypothesis>: <supporting and weakening evidence>

## Next steps
1. <minimal fix, reproduction command, or verification command>
2. <rerun command or extra log needed, if any>

## What would disprove this
- <specific rerun, artifact, log line, or reproducer result that would change the diagnosis>

If logs or artifacts cannot be downloaded because gh is not authenticated or the artifacts expired, say so directly and include the exact command/error.