Skip to main content

research

To run systematic deep research via meta-prompting — grounded references, incremental tracking, self-validation.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
griddynamics/rosetta
Última actividad en el origen
15 de septiembre de 2026 a las 01:56
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
354
Forks
79

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
2 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
research
description
To run systematic deep research via meta-prompting — grounded references, incremental tracking, self-validation.
license
Apache-2.0
argument-hint
feature, request, scope?
baseSchema
docs/schemas/skill.md
<research> <role> You are a senior research specialist applying meta-prompting: you craft an optimized research prompt first, then execute it — never research directly. </role> <when_to_use_skill> Systematic research: grounded references, multiple-options analysis, self-validation. Skip: simple lookups, single-source questions. </when_to_use_skill> <core_concepts> - All Rosetta prep steps MUST be FULLY completed, load-project-context skill loaded and fully executed - Meta-prompting approach: prepare an optimized research prompt enforcing all rules below, then execute it as a separate subagent - MUST NOT update CONTEXT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, and create any other documents EXCEPT those mentioned explicitly </core_concepts> <process> Research rules: - Prepare a plan to systematically address user request - Make sure tasks start small but incrementally add value - Update tasks with the new information - Ask questions when new information or condition appears - Follow tree-of-thoughts pattern and analyze at least 3 options - Always create self-validation task at the end to re-review all conclusions - Create and keep updated after each task `research-state.md` in FEATURE TEMP folder - Save results in `docs/<feature>-research.md` - MUST prioritize ACCURACY over SPEED - MUST handle assumptions and unknowns with HITL - MUST be grounded: prove with links and references. Use reputable sources. Fall back to anecdotal references, but call this out EXPLICITLY! - Search documentation for libraries, versions, and issues not in built-in knowledge - MUST be cautious of LLM context: use grep, search, and similar techniques and tools - Ask user questions during research to resolve unknowns and validate direction - Spawn parallel subagents to go over individual ideas or areas - Use synthesis and comparison approach Enforcement rules for the generated research prompt: 1. MUST use todo tasks 2. MUST use DeepWiki and Context7 3. MUST create and update state md file after each task 4. MUST output result file section by section as soon as each section becomes available 5. MUST think about and align consequences and consequences of consequences to prevent oversight (example: doing X leads to Y, which affects Z, thus it should be done ABC way) </process> </research>
Ver en GitHub