| name | seeming |
| description | Seeming is coordinated appearance change at scale: mass theming, batch rebranding, global copy tone shifts, and UI-wide presentation updates. The underlying structures stay the same. The spell is about coherent surface transformation, not structural reinvention. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | Wizards of the Ghosts |
| license | CC0-1.0 |
| compatibility | Hermes Agent skills system |
| metadata | {"hermes":{"tags":["spell","shipping-now","metaphorical","monitoring-and-protection","observability","monitoring","guardrails","privacy"]}} |
Seeming
Re-skin the whole cast without rewriting their roles.
What This Skill Does
Seeming is coordinated appearance change at scale: mass theming, batch rebranding, global copy tone shifts, and UI-wide presentation updates. The underlying structures stay the same. The spell is about coherent surface transformation, not structural reinvention.
In this grimoire, Seeming is treated as a metaphorical spell with a shipping-now delivery profile.
Canonical reference input: Seeming (spell).
When To Use
- You need a coordinated presentation change across many screens, assets, or components.
- The work is primarily visual, tonal, or labeling-related rather than architectural.
- You want users to experience a new look without relearning the system.
Prerequisites
- No extra runtime dependencies beyond Hermes Agent and the normal toolset for this session.
Procedure
- Restate the target, the success condition, and any no-touch boundaries before taking action.
- Identify the presentation-layer surfaces that need to change together.
- Define the transformation rules for brand, tone, theme, or visual treatment.
- Return the change set and the QA plan that confirms structure and behavior stayed put.
- Package the result as the deliverables below, with confidence, assumptions, and unresolved risk called out explicitly.
Deliverables
- A batch presentation-change plan.
- A mapping of old visual or tonal patterns to new ones.
- A regression checklist for unchanged structure and accessibility.
Pitfalls / Guardrails
- Keep the metaphor anchored to a real mechanism instead of drifting into lore.
- Do not let cosmetic changes obscure compliance information, product semantics, or accessibility affordances.
- Call out where the request sounds superficial but would actually require structural changes.
Verification
- Check that the result includes every deliverable promised above.
- Check that confirmed facts, assumptions, and inferences are visibly separated.
- Check that the metaphor still maps cleanly to a real operational mechanism.
Example Invocation
/seeming plan a coordinated presentation-only change across this set of interfaces, assets, or messages