| name | s4h-writing-tone-alignment |
| description | Diagnoses and repairs tone drift — shifts in register, formality, warmth, or rhythm that make a piece feel like it was written by multiple people or in multiple moods. Use when the voice changes mid-piece without intention. Triggers: 'the tone keeps shifting', 'tone drift', 'tone alignment', 'inconsistent register', 'the voice changes mid-piece', 'this sounds like different writers'. |
Writing: Tone Alignment
Tone drift is what happens when a piece moves through multiple registers without intention — formal to casual, warm to clinical, urgent to contemplative — destroying the reader's sense of who is speaking. The reader cannot trust a voice they cannot locate. When they feel the voice shift, they become aware they are reading a document rather than inhabiting a communication. The intimacy, or the authority, or the momentum — whatever the piece was building — dissolves.
Tone drift is most common in three situations: multi-author documents, where different contributors have different natural voices; long pieces written over time, where the writer's mood, energy, or approach has changed between sessions; and pieces assembled from different source material, where the register of the sources bleeds into the synthesis.
Tone has multiple dimensions, and they can drift independently:
- Formality: Where on the formal/informal spectrum? Legal prose to text message — everything between is possible, but the piece should occupy a consistent bandwidth.
- Warmth: Where on the cold-to-warm spectrum? Institutional distance to personal intimacy?
- Urgency: Is the piece pressing forward, or is it contemplative and spacious?
- Stance toward the reader: Does it treat the reader as a peer, a student, a customer, a collaborator, a stranger?
- Sentence rhythm: Short and punchy, or long and periodic? The rhythm carries register even when the words don't shift.
Your Process
Step 1: Intended Tone
What tone was intended? If it's not stated, extract it from the strongest passage in the piece — the section that works best is the baseline. State the intended tone precisely across all five dimensions: formality level / warmth level / urgency / stance toward reader / sentence rhythm.
Framing check: Confirm the piece and its intended register before continuing. State what you've identified — the specific text being analysed and the baseline tone you've extracted — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "I'm reading this as: [your one-sentence framing of the piece and its intended tone]. Is that right?"
- Header: "Framing"
- Options:
- Yes — proceed — framing is correct
- Adjust — one element is off; user will correct it before you continue
- Reframe — different situation than read; incorporate the correction before proceeding
Step 2: Scan for Departures
Read through the piece and flag sections where any of the five tone dimensions shifts from the baseline. Don't just flag "informal" or "formal" — be specific: "this section shifts from 'collegial peer' to 'authoritative expert'"; "this paragraph breaks from short declarative sentences into subordinate clause-heavy long sentences that slow the pace and change the register."
Step 3: Diagnose the Cause
For each departure, what produced it?
- Source bleed: The tone of a cited source or reference has leaked into the prose
- Multi-author drift: A different contributor's natural voice
- Energy change: Written in a different session, different mood, different urgency
- Register confusion: The writer shifted their mental audience for this section
- Functional shift: The section is doing something different (explaining vs. persuading vs. narrating) and the register shifted with the function without awareness
Understanding the cause determines the correction.
Step 4: Prescribe Corrections
For each flagged section: what specific changes bring it into alignment? This may involve vocabulary choices ("synergistic" → "works well together"), sentence length adjustments, the removal of hedging language, or the addition of warmth. Be specific — "make it more casual" is not actionable; "replace the three nominalisations in this paragraph and cut the passive construction in the final sentence" is.
Human Check-in
Before proceeding, use the AskUserQuestion tool. State your interpretation of the situation in 1–2 sentences — what is being analyzed and what the core question is — then ask:
- Question: "My read: [your 1–2 sentence interpretation]. How do you want to proceed?"
- Header: "Scope"
- Options:
- Full analysis — Complete all steps, reasoning shown throughout
- Key findings only — Bottom-line output, skip step-by-step detail
- Specific focus — Zoom in on one aspect of this analysis
- Reframe — The read is off; correct it and the analysis will follow the corrected framing
Proceed based on their selection. If the user reframes, incorporate the correction before running any analysis.
Output Format
Tone Audit
Intended Tone:
- Formality: [X/10, characterised]
- Warmth: [X/10, characterised]
- Urgency: [paced characterisation]
- Stance toward reader: [peer / student / customer / etc.]
- Sentence rhythm: [characterised]
Flagged Departures:
- [Location] — [Quoted passage] — Dimension shifted: [formality / warmth / urgency / stance / rhythm] — Direction of drift: [toward formal / toward casual / etc.]
- [Repeat for each]
- NONE FOUND if clean
Cause Diagnoses: [Per departure: source bleed / multi-author drift / energy change / register confusion / functional shift]
Correction Prescriptions: [Per departure: specific changes — vocabulary, sentence structure, register adjustments]
Notes
- Tone drift is different from intentional register shift. Some pieces move between registers deliberately — a piece that shifts from formal analysis to personal reflection is doing something intentional. The question is whether the shift is marked and controlled, or whether it just happens.
- Tone drift is most damaging at openings: if the first two paragraphs are not tonally consistent with each other, the reader never establishes their footing.
- Pairs with
/s4h-writing-voice-consistency — voice is the who speaking; tone is the how. They are related but distinct. Voice consistency asks "does this sound like the same person?"; tone alignment asks "is that person speaking in a consistent register?"
- Pairs with
/s4h-writing-audience-calibration — tone is part of calibration; a piece can be tonally consistent but calibrated to the wrong audience entirely.
- Pairs with
/s4h-writing-line-editing — many tone corrections happen at the sentence level (word choice, sentence structure), so the two tools often work together.
What's Next
After delivering this output, use AskUserQuestion to offer the next move:
- Question: "Tone aligned. What's next?"
- Header: "Next"
- Options:
/s4h-writing-voice-consistency — Check voice consistency after tone alignment/s4h-writing-line-editing — Edit for the aligned tone/s4h-writing-audience-calibration — Verify tone serves the audience- Done — Wrap up and synthesise what we have so far
