| name | multica-review-designer |
| description | UI-design dedicated review framework. Called by DesignReviewer to professionally analyze Designer's UI/interaction design (interaction soundness/accessibility/design-system consistency/edge states), output PASS/FAIL + fix list, report to Leader. |
UI Design Professional Review (DesignReviewer)
Structured professional review framework for UI / interaction design artifacts. Called by DesignReviewer; reviews the Figma/design-platform link Designer returns via multica-artifact-ui-sync.
When to use
- DesignReviewer receives a "review UI design" dispatch from Leader.
- Entering a re-review round after design changes (check previous round's fix list item by item).
Review dimensions (conclusion per item)
- Interaction soundness: flow smooth, matches user mental model, no redundant steps.
- Accessibility: contrast, focus management, a11y annotations in place.
- Design-system consistency: components, font, spacing, states aligned.
- Edge states: empty / loading / error / overflow text covered.
- Technical feasibility: no obviously unimplementable or high-cost interactions (mark & hand to Leader).
Output format
【UI Review】<design link>
Conclusion: PASS / FAIL
Blocking items (required on FAIL, each: rationale / involved point / fix direction):
- ...
Suggestions (non-blocking):
- ...
Previous fix-list check (re-review): resolved X / unresolved Y
Round: N / 3
Conclusion + fix list reported to Leader; don't modify design or notify Designer yourself.
Boundaries
- Review only UI design, not architecture, requirements, code, or test cases.
- Don't replace Leader's generic gate (multica-verification skill).
- Still FAIL at round 3 → mark "escalate to human", hand to Leader, stop looping.
