create-item

name	create-item
description	Creates an MCP work item from conversation context. Scans existing containers to anchor the item in the right place (Bugs, Features, Tech Debt, Observations, etc.), infers type and priority, creates single items or work trees, and pre-fills required notes. Use when the conversation surfaces a bug, feature idea, tech debt item, or observation worth tracking persistently. Also use when user says: track this, log this bug, create a task for, or add this to the backlog.
argument-hint	[optional: brief description of what to create]

create-item — Container-Anchored Work Item Creation

Create MCP work items intelligently from conversation context. This skill handles container anchoring, tag inference, structure decisions, and note pre-population so you don't have to.

---

Step 1 — Infer intent from conversation

Determine from context (or from $ARGUMENTS if provided):

• Title — what is the work item?
• Type — bug / feature / tech debt / observation / action item / general task
• Priority — high / medium / low (default: medium)
• Scope — single item, or feature with 2+ clear distinct subtasks?

If title or type cannot be inferred with confidence, use AskUserQuestion with concrete options. Do not ask open-ended questions.

---

Step 2 — Scan containers

Resolve the project rootId first: check session context for a rootId injected by the SessionStart hook, or read .taskorchestrator/config.yaml's top-level project.rootId (a file read, not an MCP call).

If a rootId is known:

query_items(operation="overview", anchorId="<rootId>", includeChildren=true)

Category containers (Bugs, Features, Tech Debt, etc.) are expected as direct children of the project root — anchor new items there. Exception: agent-observation items always stay at global depth 0, outside any project root, regardless of whether a rootId is known — they're process-global, not project-scoped.

If no rootId is known, fall back to an unscoped scan and the classification below (this is also the exact behavior from before project scoping existed):

query_items(operation="overview", includeChildren=true)

Classify the existing structure:

Pattern	Classification
Depth-0 item with category-named children (Bugs, Features, etc.)	Hierarchical — project root exists
Category-named items at depth 0, no project root	Flat — use category containers directly
No items at all	Empty — offer to create project root

---

Step 3 — Container anchoring

Category mapping

Item type	Target category container	Signal keywords
Bug / error / crash / unexpected behavior	Bugs	bug, error, crash, broken, failure, wrong, exception
Feature / enhancement / new capability	Features	feature, add, implement, new, support, capability, enhancement
Tech debt / refactor / cleanup / improvement	Tech Debt	refactor, cleanup, simplify, debt, improve, migrate, restructure
Observation / friction / optimization / missing capability	Observations	slow, performance, optimize, latency, friction, missing, gap, observe
Action item / follow-up / reminder / TODO	Action Items	todo, follow up, remind, action, track, check
General / unclear	Best-effort match — ask if uncertain

Anchoring decision tree

Hierarchical structure:
  Matching category found under project root → use as parentId
  Category missing under project root → create it, then use as parentId

Flat structure:
  Matching category at depth 0 → use as parentId
  Category missing at depth 0 → create it, then use as parentId

Empty (no project root exists):
  → AskUserQuestion: "No project root container exists yet.
    Would you like to create one for this project?"
  → Yes: create project root → create category under it → create item
  → No: create category container at depth 0 → create item under it

Exception (all branches): agent-observation items never anchor under a project root or category container — they are standalone process-global items (each its own root, not a child of any container) that live at depth 0 alongside (not under) any project root, per Step 2.

---

Step 4 — Set type via schema discovery

Read .taskorchestrator/config.yaml to discover available schemas (this is a file read, not an MCP call). In Docker, the config is mounted at a path controlled by the AGENT_CONFIG_DIR env var — read $AGENT_CONFIG_DIR/.taskorchestrator/config.yaml if that variable is set, otherwise use .taskorchestrator/config.yaml relative to the working directory.

Schemas are defined under work_item_schemas: (preferred) or note_schemas: (legacy). Each schema key is a type identifier that activates gate enforcement when set as the item's type field. Tags remain available for categorization but are no longer the primary schema selector.

Error handling: If the config file is not found, cannot be read, or contains invalid YAML, skip schema-based type assignment and create the item without a type. Inform the user: "No schema config found — item created without a type." Do not abort item creation due to a missing or malformed config.

Infer the best schema match from context:

Context signal	Schema to apply
Feature, enhancement, new capability	Match against feature-related schema keys in config (if any exist)
Bug, error, crash, unexpected behavior	Match against bug-related schema keys in config (if any exist)
Observation, friction, optimization, missing capability	Match against observation-related schema keys in config (if any exist)

If the inferred schema key exists in the config, set it as the item's type value. If the key does not exist in the config (e.g., no bug-fix schema defined), leave type unset — do not assign a type that has no matching schema.

When no confident match can be inferred:

• If a schema named default exists in the config, use it as the fallback — this lets users control what happens to unclassified items
• Otherwise, ask the user which schema to apply via AskUserQuestion, listing the available schema keys from the config
• Include a "No schema" option for items that should be schema-free

If no config file exists, skip type assignment entirely — all items will be schema-free.

Tags vs. type: Set type for schema selection. Use tags only for additional categorization/filtering that is independent of schema matching.

Trait discovery

While reading the config, also check for a top-level traits: section. Each key under traits: is a trait name that can be assigned to items via the traits parameter. Traits add additional note requirements on top of the base schema.

Assess whether any configured traits apply based on conversation context:

Context signal	Trait to consider
Database migration, schema change, ALTER TABLE	needs-migration-review (if configured)
MCP tool parameter changes, response shape changes	needs-api-compat-review (if configured)
Plugin skill/hook behavior changes	needs-plugin-update (if configured)
Auth, input validation, external data handling	needs-security-review (if configured)
Hot path changes, per-request work, startup impact	needs-perf-review (if configured)

Only assign traits that exist in the config. If no traits: section exists, skip trait assignment entirely.

If multiple traits apply, combine them: traits: "needs-migration-review,needs-api-compat-review"

Resource-bearing traits (informational): if a chosen trait's config entry carries its own resources: list, note this to the user — items with that trait will acquire an exclusive lease on the named resource key(s) when they enter work phase, and advance_item(start) can transiently fail with resource_unavailable if another item currently holds it. No extra action is needed here; this is just so the choice isn't a surprise later.

---

Step 5 — Create the item(s)

Single item (bug, observation, standalone task, action item):

manage_items(operation="create", items=[{
  title: "<inferred title>",
  summary: "<1-2 sentence description from context>",
  priority: "<inferred priority>",
  type: "<schema key or omit>",
  tags: "<categorization tags or omit>",
  parentId: "<category container UUID>"
  // Additional fields like `complexity` are optional — omit if not relevant
}])

Work tree (feature with 2+ distinct subtasks clearly described):

create_work_tree(
  root={title, summary, priority, type: "<schema key>"},
  children=[{ref: "t1", title: "..."}, {ref: "t2", title: "..."}, ...],
  parentId="<category container UUID>"
)

Default to single item when scope is unclear. Use create_work_tree only when the conversation explicitly names multiple distinct subtasks.

---

Step 6 — Pre-fill required notes

Check expectedNotes in the create response. For each note where required: true and role: "queue":

• Extract relevant content from the conversation
• Resolve guidance via query_items(operation="schema", itemId="<uuid>") (expectedNotes itself is keys-only) — use its guidance field as the authoring instruction, taking precedence over free-form inference.
• Batch all notes into a single call rather than one call per note:

  manage_notes(operation="upsert", notes=[
    {itemId: "<bug-uuid>",     key: "diagnosis",       role: "queue", body: "..."},
    {itemId: "<feature-uuid>", key: "feature-summary", role: "queue", body: "..."}
  ])
  

  (note keys come from each item's schema expectedNotes — diagnosis for bug-fix, feature-summary for feature-implementation; a single call may batch notes across multiple items)
• If conversation content is too sparse for a meaningful note body, leave it — do not fabricate content

---

Step 7 — Report

✓ Created: [title] (`short-id`)
  Path: [container path, e.g. "Features" or "Project Root › Features"]
  Tags: [tags, or "none"]
  Notes pre-filled: [key names, or "none"]

If a new category container was created, add one line:

  ↳ Created new container: [category name] under [parent]

---

Troubleshooting

No containers found in overview

• Cause: Fresh workspace with no existing structure
• Solution: The skill handles this automatically — it will offer to create a project root and category containers via AskUserQuestion

Wrong container chosen for the item

• Cause: Item type was ambiguous or the category mapping didn't match intent
• Solution: Move the item after creation with manage_items(operation="update", items=[{itemId: "<uuid>", parentId: "<correct-container-uuid>"}])

Type not matching a schema — expectedNotes is empty

• Cause: The type field doesn't match any key in .taskorchestrator/config.yaml, or the config hasn't been loaded
• Solution: Verify the type matches a work_item_schemas: (or note_schemas:) key exactly. If the config was recently changed, run /mcp to reconnect the server

Expected notes not returned after item creation

• Cause: MCP server caches schemas on first access — config changes require reconnect
• Solution: Run /mcp in Claude Code to reconnect the server, then retry the create operation