Skip to main content

testing-without-tautologies

Use when creating, editing, fixing, or reviewing tests; when adding mocks, assertions, smoke tests, unit tests, integration tests, e2e tests, or changing tests after failures.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
kenn-io/forge
Última actividad en el origen
31 de julio de 2026 a las 12:44
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
190
Forks
28

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
2 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
testing-without-tautologies
description
Use when creating, editing, fixing, or reviewing tests; when adding mocks, assertions, smoke tests, unit tests, integration tests, e2e tests, or changing tests after failures.
# Testing Without Tautologies ## Core Idea Tests should fail when protected behavior breaks. A passing test helps only if it can catch a real problem. Before writing or changing a test, ask: "What production change should make this test fail?" If you cannot answer, redesign the test. ## Quality Gate Before writing the test body, answer these: - **Who uses this?** Prefer public APIs, HTTP contracts, UI, CLI output, persisted data, or caller-visible results. Avoid private state. - **What example proves it?** Use concrete inputs and literal expected outputs. Do not compute expected values with production logic. - **What break would this catch?** Name the wrong branch, missing side effect, wrong argument, boundary case, or contract violation. - **Do we own it?** Test our choices at framework, SDK, database, and service boundaries. Do not re-test documented dependency mechanics. - **Can you state it?** Given this setup, when the user/system does X, then Y observable behavior changes. If Y is not assertable, the test is not ready. ## Required Checks Apply these checks to every new or modified test: 1. **Assert observable effects** - Check returned values, persisted state, UI, events, API calls, errors, permissions, or other visible effects. - A no-assertion test is acceptable only when the failure mode is the subject, such as "this constructor rejects invalid input." Prefer explicit assertions anyway. 2. **Make mocks specific** - Verify arguments, call counts, order, and branches when they are part of the contract. - Do not let a mock accept any input when the code must pass one value. 3. **Separate branch doubles** - Do not reuse one mock handler for success, error, incomplete, unauthorized, or other mutually exclusive paths. - Give each branch its own spy/mock so the wrong branch cannot satisfy the expectation. 4. **Do not mock the subject** - Mock dependencies, boundaries, and slow or nondeterministic collaborators. - Do not replace the method, component, handler, query, reducer, or workflow under test. - Prefer real in-process collaborators and framework test utilities when they keep the test fast. 5. **Investigate failures before changing expectations** - Do not flip expected values just to make a failing test pass. - First decide whether the production change is intended. Then update the test to describe the new contract. 6. **Avoid mirror assertions** - Do not compute expected values with the same logic under test. - Use literals, hand-checked fixtures, small examples, or invariant/property assertions. - Keep test logic simple enough to review by inspection. 7. **Do not test upstream functionality** - Do not prove that a framework, SDK, standard library, database, parser, router, or generated client works as documented. - Example: do not test Huma URL params, query strings, status codes, or OpenAPI wiring unless your code adds behavior there. - Test your boundary contract instead: route registration, value handoff to domain code, errors, permissions, and response shape. - For surprising upstream behavior, write a narrow characterization test around your integration point. Name the upstream assumption. - For fake external services, test consumer behavior and prefer a contract/verified fake check for the fake itself. 8. **Avoid blindingly obvious current-code assertions** - Do not test that the implementation is written the way it is written now. - Skip tests for plain constructor assignment, getters, trivial forwarding, constants, and data-only structs. - Test them only when they validate, normalize, default, derive, copy, enforce permissions, handle errors, cause side effects, or protect compatibility. - Prefer the first consumer-visible result that depends on the fields. ## Test Level Use the narrowest test that can catch the break, but honor repo rules. In kenn-forge, e2e tests are required for API behavior, data flow across HTTP and SQLite, and user-visible workflows. Keep those e2e tests non-tautological: assert the workflow result, stored state, rendered UI, or API contract, not just that the server, router, or page did not crash. ## Mutation Check Before finishing, mentally mutate the production code. At least one relevant test should fail for each realistic mutation. - Wrong constant or argument. - Wrong branch handler. - Missing state change. - Empty/default return. - Missing side effect. - Broken fake at a boundary your code should notice. - Renamed or rearranged private fields with behavior preserved. - Missing validation for zero, empty, nil, unauthorized, or malformed input. If none fail, the test is probably tautological. ## Red Flags - Reuses the same setup/assertion object, guaranteeing equality. - Can fail only through panic, exception, missing selector, or server crash. - Still matters if only the framework/library remains. - Translates a constructor, getter, setter, mapper, or wrapper line by line. - Exists for coverage without checking side effects, boundaries, or outcomes. - Hides expected values behind loops, formatters, builders, or helpers.
Ver en GitHub