Skip to main content

memory-remember-pattern

Tiered-Remember-After-Act pattern for ruvector — record learnings via hooks_remember at workflow completion with signal-strength tiers (Auto/Prompted/Skip). Use when authoring commands that should compound institutional memory from workflow outcomes.

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
KingInYellows/yellow-plugins
Última actividad en el origen
6 de septiembre de 2026 a las 22:45
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
0
Forks
0

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
memory-remember-pattern
description
Tiered-Remember-After-Act pattern for ruvector — record learnings via hooks_remember at workflow completion with signal-strength tiers (Auto/Prompted/Skip). Use when authoring commands that should compound institutional memory from workflow outcomes.
user-invocable
false
# Pattern: Tiered-Remember-After-Act Record learnings to ruvector memory after workflow completion, with signal strength determining whether to record automatically, prompt the user, or skip. ## What It Does Calls `hooks_remember` against the ruvector MCP server at workflow end, with content classified by signal strength (Auto/Prompted/Skip) per plugin and event type. Includes a near-duplicate dedup check (score > 0.82) and quality gates on content length and structure. ## When to Use When authoring a command that produces durable insight worth surfacing in future sessions — root causes, security findings, novel solutions, decision rationale. Skip for low-signal events (status checks, passing tests, plan context already captured in files). ## Usage > **Replica of canonical source.** The protocol constants in this pattern > (dedup `top_k=1`, `score > 0.82`) are owned by > `plugins/yellow-ruvector/skills/memory-query/SKILL.md` (yellow-ruvector > owns the MCP tools); this yellow-core file is a marked replica, kept > inline because cross-plugin `skills:` preload is unavailable > (claude-code#15944). The RULE 16 drift lint in > `scripts/validate-agent-authoring.js` enforces the sentinel line below > byte-for-byte across the canonical file and all replicas. RULE 16 > checks ONLY the sentinel line — the tier/dedup steps below restate the > same constants and must be swept manually on any change. When editing > inside the yellow-plugins monorepo, to change a constant start at the > canonical file — never edit a replica alone; the other replicas are > `plugins/yellow-core/skills/memory-recall-pattern/SKILL.md` and > `plugins/yellow-core/skills/mcp-integration-patterns/SKILL.md`. > (Outside this monorepo, treat the sentinel line as authoritative; the > canonical file may not be installed.) > > Consuming command files adapt the tier rules and dedup strategy inline > as context-specific paraphrases, so they are exempt from RULE 16's > byte-identity check (the containment scan still covers them) — on any > constant or tier-rule change, sweep them manually: > `plugins/yellow-core/commands/flow/review.md`, > `plugins/yellow-core/commands/flow/compound.md`, > `plugins/yellow-core/commands/flow/work.md`, > `plugins/yellow-review/commands/review/review-pr.md` (and > `plugins/yellow-review/references/review-pr/knowledge-compounding.md`), > `plugins/yellow-review/commands/review/review-all.md`, and > `plugins/yellow-ruvector/commands/ruvector/learn.md` (KNOWN DRIFT: > carries no protocol constants and lacks the recall-based dedup its > purpose implies — open maintainer question; do not silently "fix"). > > (`plugins/yellow-core/commands/flow/brainstorm.md`, `plan.md`, > `spec.md`, `plugins/yellow-review/commands/review/resolve-pr.md`, and > `plugins/yellow-ruvector/commands/ruvector/memory.md` are recall-only — > they never call `hooks_remember`; see the `memory-recall-pattern` skill's > sweep list instead.) Protocol sentinel (RULE 16, byte-identical in every copy): <!-- prettier-ignore --> ruvector-protocol-constants v1: recall top_k=5, discard score < 0.5, keep top 3, truncate 800 chars at word boundary; dedup top_k=1, skip if score > 0.82. ### Signal Classification Table | Tier | Signal Strength | Behavior | |---|---|---| | **Auto** | High | Record via hooks_remember without asking | | **Prompted** | Medium | Ask user via AskUserQuestion: "Save this learning to memory?" | | **Skip** | Low | Silent no-op | **Classification by plugin and event type:** | Plugin | Auto (high-signal) | Prompted (medium-signal) | Skip (low-signal) | |---|---|---|---| | yellow-review | P0/P1 security/correctness findings | P2 design/performance findings | P3 style/nits | | yellow-ci | Root cause identified | Workaround found | Status checks | | yellow-debt | Security debt patterns | Complexity/duplication hotspots | Minor style debt | | yellow-browser-test | Critical bugs (crash, data loss) | UI issues | Passing test summaries | | yellow-core (work) | Implementation insights | — | — | | yellow-core (compound) | All (user already opted in) | — | — | | yellow-core (brainstorm) | — | Decision rationale | — | | yellow-core (plan) | — | — | Plan context (already in file) | | yellow-research | — | Novel findings | — | | yellow-devin | — | Delegation failures | — | | yellow-linear | — | — | Issue patterns | | gt-workflow | — | — | Stack info | ### Quality Requirements All remembered content must meet these gates: - **Length:** 20+ words - **Structure (all three required):** - **Context:** What was built/fixed and where (file paths, commands) - **Insight:** Why a key decision was made or what failed - **Action:** Concrete steps for a future agent in the same situation - **Specificity:** Name concrete files, commands, or error messages. "Fixed CRLF in hooks.sh by running `sed -i 's/\r$//'`" not "Fixed a bug" ### Type Guidance | Type | Use for | |---|---| | `decision` | Successful patterns, techniques, conventions | | `context` | Mistakes, failures, and their fixes | | `project` | Session summaries, high-level outcomes | | `code` | Code-specific implementation notes | | `general` | Fallback when none of the above fit cleanly | ### Deduplication Check Before storing, check for near-duplicates: ```text 1. Call hooks_recall(query=content, top_k=1) 2. If score > 0.82: skip ("near-duplicate exists") 3. If hooks_recall errors (timeout, connection refused, service unavailable): wait approximately 500 milliseconds, retry exactly once. If retry also fails: skip dedup check, proceed to store. Do NOT retry on validation errors or parameter errors. ``` ### Execution ```text 1. If .ruvector/ does not exist: skip 2. Call ToolSearch("hooks_remember"). If not found: skip 3. Classify signal tier using the table above 4. If Auto: call hooks_remember(content, type) directly 5. If Prompted: AskUserQuestion "Save this learning to memory?" with preview of the content. Record if confirmed. 6. If Skip: no-op 7. If hooks_remember errors (timeout, connection refused, or service unavailable): wait approximately 500 milliseconds, retry exactly once. If retry also fails: note "[ruvector] Warning: remember failed after retry — learning not persisted" and continue. Do NOT retry on validation errors or parameter errors. ``` Note: If `memory-recall-pattern` already ran earlier in the same session, the MCP server is warm and the warmup step is not needed before this pattern. Only add a warmup call before this pattern if it runs in a workflow that does not use `memory-recall-pattern` (e.g., `/flow:compound`). ## Anti-Patterns - **Do not** omit the dedup check before hooks_remember - **Do not** remember low-signal events (status checks, passing tests, style nits) - **Do not** omit the `hooks_remember` execution-error handler — ToolSearch passing does not mean the MCP server is running ## Related - `memory-recall-pattern` — query past learnings at workflow start. - `morph-discovery-pattern` — discover morph tools at runtime.
Ver en GitHub