Skip to main content

wigolo-research

Local-first multi-step research with question decomposition, parallel search, structured briefs, cross-references, and gap analysis. Use when the user needs comprehensive analysis, comparison reports, literature reviews, or says "research", "compare X vs Y", "deep dive", "thorough analysis", "find everything about". Returns a structured `brief` with `topics`, `highlights`, `key_findings`, `sections.overview.cross_references`, `sections.comparison`, `sections.gaps`.

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
KnockOutEZ/wigolo
Última actividad en el origen
16 de julio de 2026 a las 17:09
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
5348
Forks
433

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
wigolo-research
description
Local-first multi-step research with question decomposition, parallel search, structured briefs, cross-references, and gap analysis. Use when the user needs comprehensive analysis, comparison reports, literature reviews, or says "research", "compare X vs Y", "deep dive", "thorough analysis", "find everything about". Returns a structured `brief` with `topics`, `highlights`, `key_findings`, `sections.overview.cross_references`, `sections.comparison`, `sections.gaps`.
license
AGPL-3.0-only
metadata
{"author":"KnockOutEZ","version":"0.1.43-beta.2","homepage":"https://github.com/KnockOutEZ/wigolo","repository":"https://github.com/KnockOutEZ/wigolo"}
# wigolo research Comprehensive multi-source research with structured output. Beats chaining `search` + `fetch` manually for multi-source synthesis. ## Quick Reference ```json // Standard research { "question": "How does Deno 2 compare to Node.js for production?", "depth": "standard" } // Comprehensive (more sources, deeper analysis) { "question": "SQLite vs PostgreSQL vs DuckDB for analytics", "depth": "comprehensive" } // Quick factual check { "question": "What are the breaking changes in React 19?", "depth": "quick" } // Domain-scoped research { "question": "Next.js App Router patterns", "depth": "standard", "include_domains": ["nextjs.org", "vercel.com"] } // With structured output schema { "question": "Compare Prisma vs Drizzle vs TypeORM", "depth": "standard", "schema": { "type": "object", "properties": { "orm": { "type": "string" }, "bundle_size": { "type": "string" }, "type_safety": { "type": "string" } } } } ``` ## Depth Levels | Depth | Sub-queries | Sources | Time | Use case | |-------|-------------|---------|------|----------| | `quick` | 2-3 | 5-8 | ~15s | Quick factual check | | `standard` | 4-5 | 10-15 | ~40s | Normal research (default) | | `comprehensive` | 6-7 | 20-25 | ~80s | Deep comparison, full review | Override the source count for the chosen depth with `max_sources` (cap 50) — raise it to widen coverage, lower it to keep a run fast. ## Output: Structured Brief When MCP sampling is unavailable (common case), the output carries a `brief`: ```json { "brief": { "key_findings": [...], // top passages across all sources — start report here "topics": [...], // sources grouped by sub-query "sections": { "overview": { "cross_references": [...] }, // findings corroborated by 2+ sources — most reliable "comparison": {...}, // entity-specific points for X vs Y queries "gaps": [...] // sub-queries / named entities with limited coverage } }, "sub_queries": [...], "sources": [...], "query_type": "..." // decomposition strategy used } ``` **Gaps surface named sub-entities that decomposition or search could not corroborate** — never silently dropped. ## Writing the Report See [wigolo/rules/synthesis.md](../wigolo/rules/synthesis.md). Quick version: 1. Start with `key_findings` for the executive summary. 2. Use `sections.overview.cross_references` for the most reliable claims. 3. Write sections from `topics`. 4. Build comparison table from `sections.comparison` (if present). 5. Note `sections.gaps` as limitations. 6. Cite with [N] format from `citations`. ## Anti-Patterns - DON'T use for single-URL lookups — use `fetch` instead. - DON'T use for data gathering — use `agent` with a schema instead. - DON'T pre-probe cache before calling research — it checks internally. ## When NOT to use wigolo-research - **You want a single-shot search result, not a synthesized report** — use `search` with `format: "answer"`. ## See Also - [wigolo-search](../wigolo-search/SKILL.md) — for single-query search - [wigolo-agent](../wigolo-agent/SKILL.md) — for structured data gathering (not reports) - [wigolo/rules/synthesis.md](../wigolo/rules/synthesis.md) — how to write from briefs
Ver en GitHub