Skip to main content

plan

💡💡💡 Intelligent plan creation with prompt enhancement

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
LongLeo287/SEOSONA-OS
Última actividad en el origen
4 de agosto de 2026 a las 05:01
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
2
Forks
1

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
9 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
plan
description
💡💡💡 Intelligent plan creation with prompt enhancement
argument-hint
[archive|ci|cro|fast|hard|parallel|two|validate] [task]
metadata
{"author":"claudekit","version":"1.0.0"}
## Your mission <task> $ARGUMENTS </task> ## Pre-Creation Check (Active vs Suggested Plan Detection) Check the `## Plan Context` section in the injected context: - If "Plan:" shows a path → Active plan exists. Ask user: "Active plan found: {path}. Continue with this? [Y/n]" - If "Suggested:" shows a path → Branch-matched plan hint only. Ask user if they want to activate it or create new. - If "Plan: none" → Proceed to create new plan using naming pattern from `## Naming` section. ## Workflow - Analyze the given task and use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask for more details if needed. - Decide to use `/plan:fast` or `/plan:hard` SlashCommands based on the complexity. - Execute SlashCommand: `/plan:fast <detailed-instructions-prompt>` or `/plan:hard <detailed-instructions-prompt>` - Activate `planning` skill. - Note: `detailed-instructions-prompt` is **an enhanced prompt** that describes the task in detail based on the provided task description. ## Important Notes **IMPORTANT:** Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process. **IMPORTANT:** Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports. **IMPORTANT:** Ensure token efficiency while maintaining high quality. **IMPORTANT:** In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any. **IMPORTANT**: **Do not** start implementing. ## Subcommands | Subcommand | Description | Reference | |------------|-------------|-----------| | `archive` | Write journal entries and archive specific plans or all plans | `references/archive.md` | | `ci` | Analyze Github Actions logs and provide a plan to fix the issues | `references/ci.md` | | `cro` | Create a CRO plan for the given content | `references/cro.md` | | `fast` | 💡💡 No research. Only analyze and create an implementation plan | `references/fast.md` | | `hard` | 💡💡💡 Research, analyze, and create an implementation plan | `references/hard.md` | | `parallel` | 💡💡💡 Create detailed plan with parallel-executable phases | `references/parallel.md` | | `two` | 💡💡💡💡 Research & create an implementation plan with 2 approaches | `references/two.md` | | `validate` | Validate plan with critical questions interview | `references/validate.md` | ## Routing 1. Parse subcommand from `$ARGUMENTS` (first word) 2. Load corresponding `references/{subcommand}.md` 3. Execute with remaining arguments
Ver en GitHub