| name | logo-designer |
| description | Generate professional SVG logos from project context, producing 7 brand variants (mark, full, wordmark, icon, favicon, white, black) plus a showcase HTML page. Skip for raster-only logos, product illustrations, or full brand-guideline docs. |
| license | MIT |
| effort | medium |
| metadata | {"version":"1.2.2","author":"Luong NGUYEN <luongnv89@gmail.com>"} |
Logo Designer
Design modern, professional logos by analyzing project context and generating SVG-based brand assets.
Environment Check
Before running this skill, verify:
If any check fails, the skill will stop and ask for clarification.
Subagent Architecture
This skill uses an Explorer+Executor (A) + Review Loop (C) architecture:
Phase 1: Brand Research
↓ (brand-researcher agent)
↓
Phase 2-3: SVG Generation (Interactive Style Selection)
↓ Main agent: interactive style selection with user
↓
Phase 3: Generate All 7 SVGs
↓ (svg-generator agent)
↓
Phase 4: SVG Validation
↓ (svg-reviewer agent)
↓
Final Output: 7 SVG files in /assets/logo/ + brand-showcase.html + Design Rationale
Agents:
agents/brand-researcher.md — Reads project files, produces structured brand brief
agents/svg-generator.md — Generates all 7 SVG files (mark, wordmark, full, icon, favicon, white, black)
agents/svg-reviewer.md — Validates SVG structure (viewBox, no rasters, all files present, correct names)
Key Insight: 7 SVG files generated inline is the single biggest context cost. Brand research across multiple project files adds to the burden. The reviewer acts as a quality gate to catch SVG structure issues before files are committed.
Repo Sync Before Edits (mandatory)
Before creating/updating/deleting files in an existing repository, sync the current branch with remote:
branch="$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
git fetch origin
git pull --rebase origin "$branch"
If the working tree is not clean, stash first, sync, then restore:
git stash push -u -m "pre-sync"
branch="$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
git fetch origin && git pull --rebase origin "$branch"
git stash pop
If origin is missing, pull is unavailable, or rebase/stash conflicts occur, stop and ask the user before continuing.
Workflow
Phase 1: Project Analysis
Automatically analyze the current project to understand brand context:
-
Detect product identity - Check these files in order:
README.md - Product name, description, tagline
package.json - Name, description, keywords
pyproject.toml - Project name and description
Cargo.toml - Package name and description
go.mod - Module name
-
Find existing brand assets - Search for:
/docs/brand_kit.md, /.docs/brand_kit.md, brand_kit.md
/docs/prd.md, prd.md - Product requirements with brand info
/assets/logo/, /public/logo, /static/logo - Existing logos
- Tailwind config for existing color palette
-
Identify project type from codebase structure:
- Developer/CLI/Open Source -
.github/, CLI entry points, MIT license
- SaaS/Productivity - Web app structure, auth, dashboard patterns
- Startup - Lean structure, MVP patterns
- Enterprise/B2B - Complex architecture, integrations
- Consumer/Mobile - React Native, Flutter, mobile-first patterns
-
Summarize findings before proceeding:
Product: [name]
Type: [Developer Tool / SaaS / Startup / Enterprise / Consumer]
Purpose: [1-sentence description]
Audience: [target users]
Existing colors: [hex codes if found, or "None detected"]
Assets found: [list or "None"]
Phase 2: Logo Design
Pick a style based on the detected project type (Developer/SaaS/Startup/Enterprise/Consumer), then design a minimalist, geometric mark that reads at every size from 16px favicon to hero banner. Use detected brand colors when present, else apply the Default Style Guide (dark base + neon-green highlights only — never as a fill). Confirm with the user how the product name should be cased in the wordmark before generating any text-bearing SVG.
See references/design-principles.md for the style table, full visual/color/typography rules, and the Default Style Guide palette with system status colors.
Phase 3: Deliverables
Generate the canonical mark first, then derive 6 sibling variants from its exact path data so every file shares the same geometry. The svg-generator agent must receive the literal d="" strings — do not paraphrase shapes.
Output structure:
/assets/logo/
├── logo-mark.svg # Canonical 64×64 mark (source of truth)
├── logo-full.svg # 320×72 mark + wordmark
├── logo-wordmark.svg # 180×40 text only
├── logo-icon.svg # 512×512 app icon (centered, padded)
├── favicon.svg # 16×16 simplified 2-layer mark
├── logo-white.svg # 320×72 white (for dark backgrounds)
├── logo-black.svg # 320×72 black (for light backgrounds)
└── brand-showcase.html # Self-contained brand identity page
After writing all 7 files, read back mark, full, icon, white, and black variants and verify d="" strings are identical (or correctly scaled via transform). Fix divergences before continuing.
See references/svg-deliverables.md for full variant specifications, scale calculations, favicon simplification rules, and SVG requirements.
Phase 4–5: Documentation & Brand Showcase
After SVGs are written, output the design rationale (symbol meaning, color choices, typography reasoning), a hex-code color specification, and a Tailwind config snippet. Then generate /assets/logo/brand-showcase.html — a self-contained presentation page (hero, design concept, variant grid, palette, typography, dev reference, footer) and open it in the browser.
See references/brand-showcase.md for the full HTML page structure, design guidelines, and the documentation template.
Expected Output
For a CLI tool called "fastbuild", the skill produces:
/assets/logo/
├── logo-mark.svg — 64×64 abstract "F" mark (canonical geometry)
├── logo-full.svg — 320×72 mark + "FASTBUILD" wordmark
├── logo-wordmark.svg — 180×40 text-only wordmark
├── logo-icon.svg — 512×512 mark centered in rounded square
├── favicon.svg — 16×16 simplified 2-layer mark
├── logo-white.svg — 320×72 full logo in white (for dark backgrounds)
├── logo-black.svg — 320×72 full logo in black (for light backgrounds)
└── brand-showcase.html — self-contained brand identity presentation page
Design rationale summary presented to the user:
Product: fastbuild
Type: Developer/CLI Tool
Symbol: Abstract "F" from stacked horizontal speed bars
Colors: #0A0A0A base, #00FF41 neon green accent (borders and highlights only)
Typography: Inter Bold for wordmark
Edge Cases
- No project context found: Ask the user for product name, product type, and one-sentence purpose before generating anything.
- Existing brand colors detected: Use them instead of the default dark/neon-green palette; confirm with the user before proceeding.
- User does not specify wordmark casing: Ask explicitly before proceeding (see
references/design-principles.md for the casing rule and examples).
- SVG geometry diverges across variants: Re-run the Phase 3 verification step (read back and diff
d="" strings) and fix before finishing.
- No git repository: Skip the branch and sync steps; write directly to the current directory and note this in the summary.
- favicon.svg complexity: At 16×16 the full mark is unreadable — always simplify to 2 layers (outer + inner) and drop the middle detail layer; preserve proportional geometry.
- User rejects the proposed style: Iterate on Phase 2 (style selection) until the user approves before generating any SVG files.
Acceptance Criteria
Step Completion Reports
After each phase, emit a ◆ [Phase] (step N of 4) status block listing per-check pass/fail and a final Result: line (PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL). Keep the agent's context budget tight by reusing the template — do not re-paraphrase it per phase.
See references/step-reports.md for the full report template, per-phase check lists, and a worked Analysis Summary example.
Notes
- Always show logo previews on both light (#FAFAFA) and dark (#0A0A0A) backgrounds
- Confirm wordmark casing before generating (see Phase 2 and Edge Cases)
- If no project context is found, ask the user for: product name, type, and purpose
- Prefer simplicity — a logo should be recognizable at 16x16 pixels
- Consistency is non-negotiable: every variant must be visually recognizable as the same logo. The mark shape, number of layers, and accent elements must match across all files. The only things that change between variants are: color (monochrome), scale (favicon, icon), and presence of wordmark. If you cannot verify that paths match, the deliverable is incomplete.