scrape

name	scrape
description	Finds new job postings matching your profile via installed portal-search CLIs (LinkedIn, local job boards, and any skills added with /add-portal). Deduplicates across runs. Triggers on: job scrape, find jobs, search jobs, new jobs, job search, scrape jobs, /scrape
allowed-tools	Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash(bun --version), Bash(bun run .agents/skills/*/cli/src/cli.ts *), WebFetch, WebSearch, Agent, AskUserQuestion

Job Scraper

---

How It Works

This skill searches job portals using the installed portal-search CLIs in .agents/skills/ (plus WebSearch as a fallback), using queries from your profile. It deduplicates against previously seen jobs and the application tracker, and presents new matches with a quick fit assessment.

Invocation

The user triggers this skill by saying things like:

• "Find new jobs"
• "Scrape for jobs"
• "Any new positions?"
• "/scrape"

Optional arguments:

• A focus area, e.g. "/scrape data science" or "/scrape geophysics"
• "broad" to run all search categories, e.g. "/scrape broad"
• "health" to run the portal health check only (Step 4.75), without searching, deduplicating, or presenting jobs - e.g. "/scrape health", or "/scrape health jobnet" to probe one portal even if disabled

---

Execution Steps

Step 0: Load State

1. Read job_scraper/seen_jobs.json (create if missing - start with {"seen": {}})
2. Read job_search_tracker.csv to extract already-applied companies+roles
3. Read search-queries.md (this directory) for the search strategy

Step 1: Search

Read search-queries.md (this directory) for the search strategy. By default, run the top 3 priority query categories. If the user said "broad", run all categories. If the user specified a focus area (e.g. "data science"), prioritize queries from that category.

Use the installed CLI tools as the primary search mechanism. Fall back to WebSearch only for portals that do not have a CLI skill, or if bun is unavailable on the system.

1a. Check bun availability

bun --version

If this fails (bun not installed), skip to 1c (WebSearch fallback) for all portals and note the fallback in the Step 5 output.

1b. Run CLI tools (primary — run these in parallel where possible)

Discover all installed portal CLI skills by reading every SKILL.md found under .agents/skills/*/SKILL.md. Each file documents that portal's exact CLI flags and usage examples. Use each portal's own documented interface — do not guess flags. This approach automatically includes any new portals added via /add-portal without requiring changes to this file.

Honor the enabled toggle. A portal is enabled unless its SKILL.md frontmatter sets enabled: false (a missing key means enabled — the default). Skip each disabled portal and record it for the Step 5 summary. A fork can thus keep a portal installed but sit out a run without deleting its directory.

For each enabled portal skill:

1. Read its SKILL.md to find the correct bun run … invocation and supported flags.
2. Translate the query terms from search-queries.md into that portal's flag format (e.g. --key, --search-string, --query, filter codes — whatever the portal's SKILL.md specifies).
3. Scope to the last 14 days using the portal's supported recency filter flag (--jobage, --since <YYYY-MM-DD>, etc. — as documented per portal). A portal with no recency flag (jobdanmark offers none) still gets scoped: every portal's search output carries a date field, so filter client-side — drop results whose date is older than 14 days after the call returns, and never invent a flag the portal's SKILL.md does not document (the CLIs reject unknown flags). --order PublicationDate is a sort, and a sort is not a filter — pairing it with a --limit is a defensible approximation on a portal that offers nothing better (jobnet), but apply the client-side date filter on top all the same.
4. Cap results to ~20 per call using the portal's limit flag.
5. Use --format json for machine-readable output.

Run all portal CLI calls in parallel where possible using the Agent tool. Collect all results arrays into a single pool for Step 2, keeping each result tagged with its source portal skill (for Step 2 detail lookups).

If a CLI tool exits with a non-zero code, log the error message and continue — do not abort the whole search.

1c. WebSearch fallback

Use WebSearch for:

• Portals listed in search-queries.md that do not have a corresponding directory under .agents/skills/
• Any portal whose CLI fails at runtime
• When bun is unavailable (Step 1a failed)

Use the site-specific query strings from search-queries.md directly as WebSearch queries for these portals.

Tag each fallback result as WebSearch-sourced, keeping the portal tag when the fallback stands in for an installed portal whose CLI failed. Step 4 persists this as the entry's source, and Step 5 reports which portals ran on the fallback this run.

Step 2: Fetch & Parse

For each promising result from Step 1:

From CLI results: Search output already includes title, company, location, date, and URL. For jobs worth a deeper look, fetch full detail with that portal's detail command (see its SKILL.md — do not guess flags) to extract key requirements, application deadline, and a brief description snippet.

Closed-at-source detection: linkedin-search detail also returns isActive. false means the posting page itself renders LinkedIn's "No longer accepting applications" banner — the job died between being indexed and being fetched (expired LinkedIn URLs redirect to similar live jobs, so a search hit can be a ghost). Mark such a job, never silently drop it: write its entry to seen_jobs.json in Step 4 with "status": "expired" and leave it out of the Step 5 presentation — an absent entry looks identical to a job never seen, and the recorded status is what makes a later ghost report self-triaging. isActive: true is only the absence of that banner, not proof the posting is open; deadlines and dead URLs remain /rank's job.

From WebSearch results: Use WebFetch on the posting URL and extract the same fields manually. If it returns HTTP 403, retry with browser headers via curl per .claude/skills/job-application-assistant/09-web-research.md before giving up — most bank and corporate sites reject WebFetch's user agent while serving browsers normally.

Store a URL that actually resolves to the posting. A listing-page URL with a #fragment appended (.../jobs/ciso/#ikerian) is not a posting: it fetches fine and returns unrelated job titles, which makes every later /rank and /apply run fail on that entry. When WebSearch only yields a listing page, search the employer's own careers site for the role and store that URL instead, or drop the candidate rather than saving a fragment link.

For every candidate:

• Skip if the URL or company+title combo already exists in seen_jobs.json
• Skip if the company+role already appears in job_search_tracker.csv

Step 2.5: Mass-Posting Detection (within this run)

A distribution pattern worth flagging to the user as a caution signal, not as an accusation against the employer - it describes how a listing is being distributed, not a verdict on whether the company is legitimate. It alone proves nothing is wrong (companies do legitimately hire the same role across several cities); flag it so the user can factor it in when deciding whether to invest time, don't downgrade fit or silently exclude the result because of it.

If two or more results in this run's pool (from the same company, or sharing the same req/job ID visible in the URL or title) have substantially the same description and differ only in city/location/title, don't present them as separate rows. Consolidate into a single row and note the spread, e.g. "posted identically across 6 cities (BR, MX, GT)".

Step 3: Quick Fit Assessment

For each new job, do a rapid fit check (NOT the full evaluation from 04-job-evaluation.md - just a quick signal):

• High match: Role directly involves your core skills
• Medium match: Role is adjacent to your experience
• Low match: Role requires significant skills you lack

Language override: before assigning a match level, check the posting against 04-job-evaluation.md's Language Gate (a required language you haven't declared at all in your CLAUDE.md Languages table). A required language that's entirely undeclared overrides skill fit: mark it Low regardless of how well the skills align, and name it in the highlight bullets so it isn't buried under an otherwise-good-looking match. A declared language at a requirement that reads higher than your declared level is not an override — score fit normally, but add a red-flag bullet under that job's highlights (Step 5) quoting the posting's requirement next to your declared level, so the gap is visible without being auto-downgraded.

Step 4: Deduplicate & Store

1. Add ALL fetched jobs (new and skipped) to seen_jobs.json with structure:

{
  "seen": {
    "<url_or_company_title_key>": {
      "title": "...",
      "company": "...",
      "url": "...",
      "first_seen": "YYYY-MM-DD",
      "posted_date": "YYYY-MM-DD" | null,
      "deadline": "YYYY-MM-DD" | null,
      "fit": "high/medium/low",
      "status": "new/skipped/ranked/expired",
      "portal": "<source portal skill, e.g. jobindex-search>",
      "source": "cli/websearch"
    }
  }
}

The portal field records which CLI skill produced the job (results are already tagged per portal in Step 1b - persist that tag here). Entries written before this field existed lack it; the health check (Step 4.75) attributes those by matching the URL's domain against each portal's base URL, so do not backfill.

The source field records which mechanism produced the entry: cli for Step 1b portal-CLI output, websearch for the Step 1c fallback. This is what keeps a ghost-job report diagnosable after the run's summary is gone: a stored entry whose URL later resolves to nothing (or to a different job) reads very differently depending on whether it came from live CLI output or from a search index that can be weeks stale - and a presented job with no entry here at all points at fabrication, which Rule 1 forbids. Entries written before this field existed lack it; never backfill it - the mechanism was not recorded.

/rank extends this schema additively: ranked entries also carry rank_score (0–100 overall score), rank_verdict (fit band, e.g. "strong fit"), rank_date (ISO date of ranking), the veto fields location_verdict and language_gate (both PASS/FAIL/FLAG) with language_note (the quoted requirement explaining a non-PASS), and strengths/gaps (1-3 verbatim bullets each, copied from the scoring agent's findings). The status field is set to "ranked". Do not drop any of these fields when re-writing entries. Entries ranked before strengths/gaps existed simply lack them; readers tolerate their absence and never backfill by guessing. Entries ranked before the verdict rename may carry a legacy PASS/FAIL/FLAG string in location - read that as the verdict when location_verdict is absent; in fresh entries location is always a place, never a verdict.

deadline is a base field rather than a /rank extension: Step 2's detail fetch already extracts the application deadline, so it is written when the job is first seen and refreshed by /rank Step 4 when a scoring agent returns a different value. null means the posting states no deadline; a missing key means the entry predates this field - never infer a deadline from either, and never backfill by guessing.

posted_date is the posting's own publication date, taken from the date field Step 2's contract already guarantees on every portal CLI's search output. Step 1b uses that date to scope the run to the last 14 days and then drops it, so nothing downstream can distinguish a posting published yesterday from one published two years ago - first_seen is when this scraper first saw the entry, not when the employer posted it. Persisting it makes Step 1b's window auditable after the run and gives /rank a freshness signal to weigh, instead of rediscovering the date and recording it in prose that nothing reads. That gap landed for real: a freehire-search posting dated 2024-05-13 was scraped and ranked Strong Fit at position 1 of 133, its own scoring note observing the listing "may be long stale" with nothing able to act on it. null means the portal returned no date for that result (the CLIs emit date: null when a listing omits it); a missing key means the entry predates this field - never infer a posting date from either, and never backfill by guessing.

2. Only present jobs NOT already in the seen list or tracker.

Step 4.5: Generate Referral Contact Links (High & Medium Fit Only)

For every job from this run with fit of high or medium (skip low-fit jobs), build two LinkedIn people-search URLs so the user can find a recruiter or team member to reach out to for a referral or a warm intro. This is deliberately a link-generation step, not an automated lookup: no scraping, no third-party API, zero runtime dependencies or credentials required.

A. Recruiters / Talent Acquisition (the referral path)

https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/people/?keywords=<url-encoded "<Company Name> recruiter">&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER

B. Role/team peers (informational-outreach / warm-intro path)

https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/people/?keywords=<url-encoded "<Company Name> <role keyword>">&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER

Use a short keyword drawn from the posting's title for <role keyword> - e.g. a posting titled "AI Program Manager" becomes "<Company Name> AI Program Manager".

Both links are for the user to open and browse themselves - never fetch or scrape the LinkedIn people-search result pages programmatically. Never fabricate contacts or claim a specific person was found; these are search links, not results.

Step 4.75: Portal Health Check

Scraper-based portal CLIs rot silently: when a portal changes its markup, the parser usually exits 0 with zero results or with null/garbled fields, and the Step 1c fallback never fires because it only triggers on hard failure. This step catches that from evidence the run already holds.

Free pass (no extra requests). For each enabled portal that ran in Step 1b:

• Degraded scan: inspect the results it returned this run. Flags: company null or empty on every result, empty titles, undecoded entities (&) or HTML fragments in titles, URLs that do not point at the portal. Any of these means the parser is half-working and /scrape is silently collecting junk.
• Yield history: if the portal returned zero results across all of this run's queries, check whether seen_jobs.json holds prior entries from it (via the portal field, or by matching URL domains for entries predating the field). A portal that produced jobs on earlier runs and produces nothing now is suspect - the same queries worked before.

Escalation (bounded, on suspicion only). A suspect portal gets one sentinel probe: run its documented search with the example query from its own SKILL.md (that query provably worked when the skill was registered), the portal's limit flag capped at 3, --format json. If that returns nothing, retry once with a single common word. Only then is the verdict broken. A 429 or block page is never evidence of breakage - record the portal as inconclusive (rate-limited), back off, and do not retry.

Verdicts. Healthy portals get silence - no table, no line. Anything else surfaces in the Step 5 summary as a health line.

Probe-only mode (/scrape health). Skip Steps 1-4 and this step's free pass (there is no fresh run to scan); instead probe every installed portal directly - enabled ones by default, a disabled one only when named explicitly (e.g. /scrape health jobnet). Each portal gets the sentinel probe above, the degraded criteria applied to whatever it returns, and - since the user explicitly asked for diagnosis - one detail fetch on the first result of each healthy portal (description must be readable decoded text; a failure downgrades to degraded). Report all statuses in this mode, including healthy. Volume stays bounded: one search, at most one retry, at most one detail per portal.

Step 5: Present Results

Present new jobs in a table sorted by fit (high first). When Step 1b skipped portals (enabled: false), report them with the skipped (disabled): line below so opting one out stays visible rather than silent; omit the line when nothing was skipped. When any portal's results came from the Step 1c fallback this run (bun unavailable, or its CLI failed at runtime), report it with the fallback (websearch): line - fallback results come from a search index that can be stale, so the reader should know which rows carry that caveat; omit the line when every portal ran its CLI. When Step 4.75 found a portal degraded, broken, or inconclusive, add one health: line per suspect portal (healthy portals get no line); after the report, offer to set that portal's enabled: false so /scrape stops running it (and covers it via the Step 1c fallback) until it is fixed - only edit the toggle with the user's confirmation, and never edit anything else in the skill.

## New Job Matches - YYYY-MM-DD

Found X new positions (Y high, Z medium, W low match).

skipped (disabled): <portal-name>, <portal-name>

fallback (websearch): <portal-name>, <portal-name>

health: <portal-name> - degraded (company null on all 12 results); parsing anchors in .agents/skills/<portal-name>/url-reference.md
health: <portal-name> - broken (0 results for the SKILL.md test query and a broader retry); parsing anchors in .agents/skills/<portal-name>/url-reference.md

| # | Fit | Title | Company | Location | Deadline | URL |
|---|-----|-------|---------|----------|----------|-----|
| 1 | High | ... | ... | ... | ... | [Link](...) |

If Step 2.5 flagged a mass-posting pattern, note it in the Title cell (e.g. "Frontend Developer (posted in 6 cities)") rather than burying it. Do the same for a declared-language-insufficient-level flag from the Language Gate (e.g. "Backend Engineer ⚠ fluent English required") - both are signals the user should see at a glance, not just in the detail highlights below.

### High-Match Highlights
For each high-match job, add 2-3 bullet points:
- Why it matches your profile
- Key requirements to check
- Any red flags (including mass-posting signals from Step 2.5)

### Contacts
For each high/medium-fit job from Step 4.5, add a short contacts block with the two
LinkedIn search links:
- Recruiters/TA search link, for the referral path
- Role/team-peer search link, for the warm-intro / informational-outreach path

After presenting, ask:

"Want me to evaluate any of these in detail? Just give me the number(s)."

If the user picks a number, invoke the job-application-assistant skill workflow (fit evaluation first, then CV + cover letter if approved).

If the run found many new jobs (roughly 8+), also suggest /rank - it batch-scores all new postings against the full fit framework and returns a ranked shortlist, which beats eyeballing a long table. (/rank sets the ranked and expired status values in seen_jobs.json; treat both as already-seen for dedup purposes.)

Step 6: Update Tracker (Optional)

If the user decides to apply to any job, the tracker row is written by job-application-assistant Step 3b, which Step 5 already routes into - do not add a second row here. Only when the user says they applied to something outside that path, add a row using the header and the match-then-update rule in /outcome Step 1.

---

Important Rules

1. Never fabricate job postings. Only present jobs from actual CLI search/detail output or WebSearch/WebFetch results.
2. Respect deduplication. Always check seen_jobs.json AND job_search_tracker.csv before presenting.
3. Focus on configured geographic area. Skip jobs that require relocation or are clearly outside commute range.
4. Only open positions. Skip postings with expired deadlines or those marked as closed.
5. Be efficient with detail fetches. Don't run detail or WebFetch on every search hit — pre-filter by title/snippet, then fetch only promising matches.
6. Parallel searches. Run portal CLI searches in parallel; use WebSearch only for gaps the CLIs don't cover.
7. No automated people lookups. Referral contacts (Step 4.5) are LinkedIn search links only - never fetch or scrape LinkedIn people-search result pages programmatically.
8. Health checks are bounded and honest. Step 4.75 spends at most one probe, one retry, and (in health mode) one detail fetch per portal - a diagnosis, not a crawl. A rate-limit is never evidence of breakage. Health verdicts come only from observed CLI output; a portal that could not be tested is reported as inconclusive, never guessed. The enabled toggle is the only thing the health check may edit, and only with confirmation.
9. Flag distribution patterns, never accuse. The mass-posting signal (Step 2.5) describes how a listing is being distributed, not a claim that the employer is a scam. Never name a company as fraudulent or untrustworthy - present the observation and let the user decide.