Menú
Reviews test coverage for reproducibility of all analysis steps, seed fixation, and result determinism
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Reference for configuring, launching, and monitoring research iteration loops and analysis polish loops
Verifies the analysis pipeline runs end-to-end, outputs match expectations, and LaTeX compiles
Hands-on QA of the research analysis pipeline. Use whenever the user asks to verify the pipeline end-to-end, check output file integrity, validate table and figure generation, test data processing, or verify LaTeX compilation. Triggers on phrases like "test the pipeline", "QA the analysis", "check the outputs", "verify the tables", "run end-to-end", "does the paper compile", or any request to validate a research pipeline.
Define research question, hypotheses, methodology outline, and literature gap
Decompose a research question into cook-it-ready epic beads with methodology specifications
Comprehensive playbook for building rigorous, publication-quality research papers. Covers the full research output sequence from paper structure and statistical reporting through table formatting, figure design, LaTeX conventions, academic writing quality, and pre-submission review.
| name | Reproducibility Coverage Reviewer |
| description | Reviews test coverage for reproducibility of all analysis steps, seed fixation, and result determinism |
Reviews test coverage to ensure research reproducibility: are all analysis steps tested, are random seeds fixed, are results deterministic across runs, and do tests verify actual statistical computations?
Share cross-cutting findings via SendMessage: reproducibility gaps hiding methodology issues go to architecture-reviewer; unnecessary test complexity goes to simplicity-reviewer.
AgentTeam member in the review phase. Spawned via TeamCreate. Communicate with teammates via SendMessage.
