write-fixture

name	write-fixture
description	Write Java/Kotlin tests with Fixture Monkey — enumerate the cases a method can produce, pick the ones worth testing, and build each fixture pinning only the properties that force the expected outcome.
when_to_use	Use when writing or adding tests for a Java or Kotlin method; when a test needs an object to test with; when replacing hand-built test objects, `new` calls, or test builders with Fixture Monkey; when a Fixture Monkey object fails to generate or its properties come back null; or when reviewing a test whose fixture sets more than the scenario needs. Example requests — "write tests for OrderService.calculate", "add test cases for this method", "why is Fixture Monkey not generating this record", "this test sets way too many fields".
allowed-tools	WebFetch(domain:naver.github.io), Bash(jshell *), Bash(./gradlew *), Bash(mvn *)

Writing tests with Fixture Monkey

Fixture Monkey generates test objects with random values. Two skills matter: choosing which cases to test, and knowing what not to set in each one.

Pin the properties that force the expected outcome. Leave everything else random.

A fixture that sets every field is a hand-rolled builder with extra ceremony — it breaks when an unrelated field is added, and it drags the test file into diffs it has nothing to do with.

Scope: tests only

Never modify production code. This work adds and edits tests. Production sources are read-only — read them to understand behaviour, never to change it.

That holds even when changing them would be easier:

Temptation	Do instead
Add @ConstructorProperties, a no-arg constructor, or a setter so the type generates	Choose a different introspector, or instantiate a specific constructor
Relax a validation annotation that keeps rejecting samples	Pin the property to a valid value, or narrow the Arbitrary
Widen a field's visibility to reach it	Reach it through the constructor or an existing accessor
Remove or weaken a @Nullable so defaultNotNull(true) reaches the field	Leave the annotation alone: setNotNull the property, or empty the null-inject generator's nullable-annotation set — see Nullability comes first
"Fix" a bug the new test just exposed	Report it and leave the failing test — see step 6

If a test genuinely cannot be written without a production change, stop and say so, naming the change and why it is needed. Let the user decide. A production edit smuggled in with a test is the one thing a reviewer will not be looking for.

Procedure

Steps 1–4 decide which tests to write. Steps 5–6 write each one.

1. Identify the method under test

Name the exact method. Read its body and the types it takes and returns. If the request is vague ("write tests for the order service"), narrow it to specific methods and say which ones you picked.

Everything downstream depends on this being one concrete method, not a class or a feature.

2. Enumerate the cases the method can produce

Work through the body and list every distinct outcome. Look for:

• Branches — every if / else / when / switch arm, and every guard clause.
• Boundaries — for each comparison, the value below, at, and above the threshold. amount >= 100_000 yields 99,999 / 100,000 / 100,001.
• Exceptions — every throw, and every call that can throw.
• Empty and absent — empty collection, null, Optional.empty(), zero, when the type permits them.
• Enum and subtype fan-out — each constant or implementation that reaches a different path.
• Interactions — combinations where two conditions are not independent, e.g. a member discount and a coupon that cannot stack.

List them plainly before writing code. This list is the deliverable of steps 2–3, and it is worth showing to the user.

3. Select the cases worth testing

Do not test everything you listed. Keep a case if it earns its place:

Keep	Drop
A distinct branch or outcome	A case that reaches the same code path as one already kept
A boundary value, on both sides	Repeats of the same value class (three "large amounts")
An error path with distinct handling	A case only the framework can trigger
A regression the bug report describes	Combinations that no caller can construct

Aim for the smallest set that covers every outcome once, plus the boundaries. Say which cases you dropped and why — that reasoning is what lets the user disagree.

4. Ask before going exhaustive

The step-3 list is the default: representative coverage. Exhaustive coverage — every combination, every boundary, every enum constant — costs real test-suite time and maintenance, so it is the user's call, not yours.

If the user has already asked for thorough or exhaustive tests, skip the question and cover the full step-2 list. Otherwise, present the selected cases, note roughly how many more a full sweep would add, and ask whether they want it. Then proceed with the answer — do not block on it if the user is not present; write the representative set and note that the exhaustive set is available.

When exhaustive coverage is wanted, prefer @ParameterizedTest over copy-pasted methods, so the case list stays readable.

5. Identify the properties that force the outcome

For each selected case, pin a property only if one of these holds:

Pin when	Example
Drives the expected value — the assertion's number cannot be derived without it	discount test: price and quantity — pinning both makes the expected discount an exact, obvious number
Selects the branch — its value decides which path runs	the underage path needs age below the threshold
Matched by a stub	given(repository.findById(id)) needs the same id
Required for validity — otherwise the object cannot be built, or the code throws before reaching the case	a non-null foreign key, an enum discriminant selecting a subtype
Collides — a random value would violate a real constraint	a uniquely-indexed column, a fixed-width parsed code

Everything else stays random. Do not pin because a property is conceptually important, because production requires it, or because a random value looks odd in a debugger — none of that changes the outcome.

The test for a pin: if this property were random, could the assertion still be written as an exact expected value? If yes, leave it random.

Over-pinning is the common failure and no test run catches it — it surfaces later as a diff in an unrelated pull request. When unsure, leave it random; step 6's verification will tell you if you were wrong.

When two properties must agree with each other, do not pin both to hand-computed constants — pin the minimum set and derive the rest with thenApply.

6. Build the fixture with set, then verify

Pin with the narrowest API that expresses the constraint. Take the first row that fits:

The case needs	Use
One exact value	set
Any value in a range	set with an Arbitrary — Arbitraries.longs().greaterThan(100)
Only that it is present / absent	setNotNull / setNull
A specific collection size	size, minSize, maxSize — before setting elements
A value derived from another	thenApply
That this exact instance survives, undecomposed	set(selector, Values.just(value)) — only when fixing it is genuinely required
A cross-field constraint nothing above expresses	setPostCondition — last resort, rejection sampling

A value that merely has to be legal is not a pin — it is a domain constraint, and it belongs somewhere the next test does not have to repeat it. See Constrain the values you did not pin below.

Two ordering rules, both silent when broken.

size before element writes, or the elements land on a collection that may be too short and are dropped.

And on overlapping paths the last call wins — including across a parent and its child, where it decides whether the parent exists at all:

.setNull(javaGetter(Order::getCustomer))                                  // parent nulled
.set(javaGetter(Order::getCustomer).into(Customer::getName), "Kim")       // parent revived, name set

.set(javaGetter(Order::getCustomer).into(Customer::getName), "Kim")
.setNull(javaGetter(Order::getCustomer))                                  // parent null; the name pin is gone

The first order is what makes a shared base fixture work — null a subtree there, revive just the part a case needs. The second loses the pin with no exception. A helper that returns a builder gives the right order for free, since the case's own calls come after.

Values.just is for when the value must not be rebuilt — nothing else. Plain set decomposes the object and regenerates its properties, so a pre-built list comes back with different element values and no exception is raised. That silence is a symptom to recognise, not a reason to reach for Values.just by default: if the assertion does not depend on those inner values, plain set is correct and leaves the rest random, which is the point. Reach for Values.just only when the exact instance is what the case is about — the same restraint that applies to fixed().

Select properties type-safely. String paths break silently on rename, and an unmatched path is ignored rather than reported.

.set(javaGetter(Order::getStatus), OrderStatus.PAID)     // Java

.setExp(Order::status, OrderStatus.PAID)                 // Kotlin

Target	Java	Kotlin
Direct property	javaGetter(Order::getStatus)	Order::status
Nested	javaGetter(Order::getCustomer).into(Customer::getName)	Order::customer into Customer::name
One element	javaGetter(Order::getItems).index(Item.class, 0)	Order::items[0]
All elements	javaGetter(Order::getItems).allIndex(Item.class)	Order::items["*"]

javaGetter resolves the property name by stripping a get/is prefix, or by using the method name as-is when it already matches a field. Record accessors and other prefix-less getters work unchanged — javaGetter(Metric::totalChangeCount) is as valid as javaGetter(Order::getStatus), including for primitive components. A fluent accessor whose name does not match any field is the one case that fails to resolve.

Java imports javaGetter from com.navercorp.fixturemonkey.api.expression.JavaGetterMethodPropertySelector — the identically named one in ...api.experimental is deprecated. Kotlin needs KotlinPlugin and takes the Exp suffix on every builder method (setExp, sizeExp, setNullExp, setNotNullExp, setPostConditionExp), with an ExpGetter variant for Java-style getter references.

Nullability comes first

Every nullable property is null 20% of the time by default (DEFAULT_NULL_INJECT = 0.2). That single fact causes more confusing failures than anything else here: production code does projects.stream().collect(toMap(Project::getId, ...)), getId() comes back null, and the NPE looks like a service bug.

So before pinning anything else: any field the code under test dereferences must be non-null. Decide it explicitly rather than hoping.

Scope	How
The whole instance	.defaultNotNull(true) on the builder
One type, everywhere	.pushAssignableTypeNullInjectGenerator(Project.class, context -> 0.0d)
One property, one test	setNotNull(selector)

defaultNotNull(true) only decides what the type left unsaid. Declared nullability outranks it, and nothing warns you when it loses:

The property is	Under defaultNotNull(true)
a Java field with no nullability annotation	never null
a Java field annotated @Nullable	null 20% of the time, unchanged
a Java field annotated @NotNull / @NonNull	never null — a not-null annotation also outranks a @Nullable on the same property
Kotlin String?	null 20% of the time, unchanged
Kotlin String, or a primitive	never null

Highest wins: @NotNull / @NonNull → @Nullable or Kotlin ? → defaultNotNull(true) → the 0.2 default. So the annotation that documents "this may be absent" is precisely what keeps the flakiness, and @Nullable here means any name in the default list — javax.annotation, jakarta.annotation, org.springframework.lang, org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual, org.jspecify.annotations, org.eclipse.jgit.annotations, org.jmlspecs.annotation.

The annotation is production code, so it stays. Fix it on the fixture side:

Reach	How
One property, one test	setNotNull(selector) — outranks the annotation
Every @Nullable in the instance, still honouring @NotNull	a DefaultNullInjectGenerator whose nullable-annotation set is empty, so nothing flips a property back to nullable and defaultNotNull decides

// DEFAULT_NULL_INJECT, DEFAULT_NOTNULL_ANNOTATION_TYPES: com.navercorp.fixturemonkey.api.generator.DefaultNullInjectGenerator
.defaultNullInjectGenerator(new DefaultNullInjectGenerator(
    DEFAULT_NULL_INJECT, false, true, false,
    new HashSet<>(),                                     // no @Nullable is recognised
    new HashSet<>(DEFAULT_NOTNULL_ANNOTATION_TYPES)))    // @NotNull still forces non-null

defaultNullInjectGenerator(context -> 0.0d) is the blunt version: no property is ever null, including one a case wants absent.

This changed inside 1.1.x. A TYPE_USE-only annotation — org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable, org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable — was invisible to generation before 1.1.15, and jspecify joined the default list only in 1.1.16. Null counts per 1000 samples for a @Nullable-annotated field under defaultNotNull(true): on 1.1.11 jspecify 0 and checker 0, on 1.1.15 jspecify 0 and checker 187, from 1.1.16 both about 200. A declaration annotation such as javax.annotation.Nullable was already 20% on 1.1.11. So an upgrade across that boundary makes a fixture start nulling a field with no change on either side — check the version before concluding the fixture is wrong.

defaultNotNull(true) has a cost: the entire object graph gets built, including nested composites the test never touches. That is generation time, and it is a hard failure if any of those types cannot be constructed. Exclude them rather than giving up on the option:

.addExceptGenerateClass(JiraConfig.class)      // or addExceptGeneratePackage(...)

Do not rely on repeated runs to catch a null. At 20% per field, three runs find it 49% of the time and nine runs 86% — you need about 21 to reach 99% on a single field. Repetition is for the randomness you accepted deliberately, not for nullability you left undecided.

First, confirm the pins actually landed. Before writing assertions against a newly configured FixtureMonkey, sample one instance of each type and check that what you pinned is what you got:

Organization probe = organization(1L, "DEPT");
assertThat(probe.getId()).isEqualTo(1L);   // fails here, not 200 lines away

A dropped pin produces no exception and no warning — it surfaces later as an NPE inside production code, on a field the test never mentions. This throwaway check turns that into a five-minute fix.

Then verify against randomness. A fixture test that passes once proves nothing — the unpinned properties took one arbitrary set of values. Run it at least ten times with fresh generation:

for i in $(seq 10); do ./gradlew test --tests '*OrderServiceTest*' --rerun-tasks || break; done

Ten is a floor, not a guarantee: it catches a 20%-likely value about 89% of the time and a 5%-likely one only 40%. Use it to find unexpected sensitivity, and handle nullability by configuration instead, as above.

An intermittent failure has two causes, and they are handled differently:

• A property that forces the outcome was left random → pin it, back to step 5.
• The production code has a real bug on inputs nobody considered → report it; do not fix it. Leave the failing test in place and state what input triggers it. Do not pin the property to silence it, and do not reach for fixed() — a test adjusted to pass over a real defect is worse than no test.

Constrain the values you did not pin

Leaving a property random does not mean leaving it arbitrary. A code that must be twelve numeric digits, an amount that cannot be negative, a date the code requires to be in the past — a fully random value violates the domain, and the test fails on data no caller could ever produce. That is not a defect the test found; it is setup that is missing.

The question is rarely how to constrain a value. It is where the constraint belongs. Take the highest row that applies — the higher it sits, the fewer places restate it:

The constraint is	Put it	How
Already declared in production code as an annotation	A plugin, once	new JakartaValidationPlugin() (or JavaxValidationPlugin) — generation then honours @Size, @Min, @Digits, @Pattern, @Email, @NotBlank, @Past
True of a domain type everywhere	The instance	register(TrackingCode.class, ...), registerExactType, registerGroup(...) to collect many
The project's default for a built-in type	A plugin, once	new JqwikPlugin().javaTypeArbitraryGenerator(...) overriding strings() / integers(); .javaTimeTypeArbitraryGenerator(...) for date and time ranges
Realistic-looking values — names, addresses	A plugin, once	new DataFakerPlugin()
True only for this case	The builder	set(selector, Arbitraries.strings().numeric().ofLength(12))
A relationship between two properties	The builder	thenApply; setPostCondition only when nothing else expresses it
That the value must not repeat	The builder	set(selector, Values.unique(supplier))

Prefer the annotation plugin to everything below it. The constraint is then stated once, where it already lives, and every test tracks it when it changes. Restating @Size(min = 5, max = 10) as ofMinLength(5).ofMaxLength(10) in a test creates a second source of truth that nothing keeps in sync — the same mistake as retyping a fixture's literal into a stub.

register takes a builder for the whole type, so the argument-less set overload constrains it without naming a property:

.register(TrackingCode.class, fixture -> fixture.giveMeBuilder(TrackingCode.class)
    .set(Arbitraries.strings().numeric().ofLength(12)))

Note where this lands against the placement rule under Creating the object: a tracking-code format the assertion never mentions is configuration the outcome does not depend on, so it is the kind that may be shared — unlike the introspector and the null policy.

An unsatisfiable constraint does not fail silently. Generation retries, then throws RetryableFilterMissException naming the property — which is also what a test gets for pinning against the domain, such as setNull on a @NotBlank field.

Creating the object

Pick the entry point by what the case needs:

Call	Returns	Use when
giveMeOne(Type.class)	one instance	nothing needs pinning
giveMe(Type.class, n)	List of n	several instances, none pinned
giveMeBuilder(Type.class)	ArbitraryBuilder	anything needs pinning — the usual choice from step 6
giveMeBuilder(value)	ArbitraryBuilder	starting from an existing object

Kotlin uses reified generics: giveMeOne<Order>(), giveMe<Order>(3), giveMeBuilder<Order>(). giveMe<T>() with no size returns a Sequence, not a List.

Generic types need a TypeReference: giveMeOne(new TypeReference<List<Order>>() {}).

Terminal operations on a builder: sample(), sampleList(n), sampleStream().

Share setup across cases as an ArbitraryBuilder, never as a sampled object — each case can then add its own pins:

private ArbitraryBuilder<Order> paidOrder() {
    return fixtureMonkey.giveMeBuilder(Order.class)
        .set(javaGetter(Order::getStatus), OrderStatus.PAID);
}

ArbitraryBuilder is mutable. set, size, and the rest add to the builder and return this — they do not return a new instance, and sample() does not reset it. So the shape above matters: it must be a method that builds a fresh one per call, never a shared field.

// Leaks. Every test's pins accumulate on the one instance, in execution order.
private static final ArbitraryBuilder<Order> PAID_ORDER = fixtureMonkey.giveMeBuilder(Order.class)...;

// Safe. A new builder per call.
private ArbitraryBuilder<Order> paidOrder() { ... }

If you do hold a builder and need to branch from it, call copy() first.

Extract a helper only when it carries a decision. paidOrder() earns its place — a default shape several cases reuse and each can extend. A helper that merely renames a one-liner does not:

// Don't — four lines to save twenty characters, and `set(quantity(), 10)`
// no longer shows which type is being selected
private static JavaGetterMethodPropertySelector<Order, Integer> quantity() {
    return javaGetter(Order::getQuantity);
}

The test is not "is it inline" but does the call site still show which property is being selected. set(quantity(), 10) fails it — a name was swapped for a name and nothing was gained. Factoring out a path prefix that many pins repeat passes it, because the leaf and the intermediate types stay visible at the call site:

private static final JavaGetterMethodPropertySelector<JiraIssueResponse, JiraFields> FIELDS =
    javaGetter(JiraIssueResponse::fields);

.set(FIELDS.into(JiraFields::status).into(JiraIssueStatus::name), "Open")

That constant is safe to share: into returns a new selector wrapping the receiver rather than mutating it, so nothing accumulates across tests the way it would on an ArbitraryBuilder. Both types you need are public — JavaGetterMethodPropertySelector<T, U> for a root and JoinJavaGetterPropertySelector<T, U> for a chained one — even though into itself is inherited from a non-public interface.

Above the builder there is one more layer: the FixtureMonkey instance itself. Introspector choice, plugins, and null policy decide what a generated object actually looks like — and whether a pin lands at all. That makes them part of the test's context, not infrastructure to be tucked away.

Keep the instance in the test class, so the file answers "why does this object look like this" on its own. A FixtureMonkey is immutable configuration and is safe in a static final field, unlike ArbitraryBuilder:

class OrderServiceTest {
    private static final FixtureMonkey FIXTURE = FixtureMonkey.builder()
        .objectIntrospector(ConstructorPropertiesArbitraryIntrospector.INSTANCE)
        .defaultNotNull(true)
        .build();

The rule that settles it: the test file shows every configuration choice its outcome depends on. A reader who must open TestFixtures to discover that defaultNotNull(true) is on cannot tell why the test passes. Extracting a shared holder is fine for configuration the outcome does not depend on — a uniform plugin set, a project-wide javaTimeTypeArbitraryGenerator — and wrong for the introspector and the null policy.

Four duplicated lines per test class is the price, and it is the cheaper side of the trade: that duplication is read far more often than it is edited.

When the object will not build

FixtureMonkey.create() defaults to BeanArbitraryIntrospector, which needs a no-arg constructor and setters — which is why records and immutable classes fail out of the box. Match the project's existing FixtureMonkey setup first: if tests elsewhere generate the same class fine, reuse their instance rather than configuring a new one.

Past that, construction is a subject of its own — an introspector per class shape, three scopes to apply one at, and a trap that costs hours. It sits in a companion file rather than here, because it is only needed when something is already wrong.

Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/object-construction.md when any of these happens. Do not reconstruct the fix from memory.

Symptom	What it means
All properties null or default, or generation fails on a record	The introspector does not fit the class shape
A set is silently ignored — some fields populated, others null, or an NPE in production code on a field the test pinned	The introspector never writes that property. There is no exception to hunt for
Works everywhere except one class	Needs a per-type override, or instantiate on the one builder
Wrong constructor picked, or a set on a constructor parameter ignored	Needs instantiate(constructor().parameter(...)), or -parameters
Having to choose between introspectors, or order a FailoverIntrospector	That file measures it instead of guessing

The last row is worth knowing about before you need it: the skill bundles ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/introspector-probe.jsh, which runs every candidate introspector against the real class and reports, per type, which ones build it and which properties each leaves unwritten.

Stubs follow the same rule

For a service-level test, most of the code is stubbing collaborators, not building fixtures. The pin/leave-random rule applies there unchanged:

• Argument the case does not depend on → a matcher. any(), anyString(), anyCollection(). Pinning a stub argument the case does not care about couples the test to a call signature it is not testing.
• Argument the case does depend on → derive it from the fixture, never retype the literal.

TtsDeployment deployment = deployment().set(javaGetter(TtsDeployment::getId), 100L).sample();

// Don't — 100L now lives in two places; changing one silently breaks the test
when(reader.findServiceCodes(anyCollection())).thenReturn(Map.of(100L, List.of("SVC-1")));

// Do — one source of truth
when(reader.findServiceCodes(anyCollection())).thenReturn(Map.of(deployment.getId(), List.of("SVC-1")));

Nothing fails at compile time when the two literals drift apart, which is what makes this silent.

Stub only the collaborators the selected case actually reaches — a stub for a call it never makes is dead setup that still has to be maintained.

When not to use Fixture Monkey

Setup is a real cost, and on a small type new Money(1_000L, KRW) can be shorter. But size today is the wrong test: a constructor names every component, so adding one puts every test that used new into a diff — the exact coupling this guide exists to avoid. Ask "is this type closed?", not "how big is it?".

Use a constructor directly only when all of these hold:

• the type is closed by nature — a value object whose shape is the point, like a money amount or a coordinate pair, not an entity that accumulates fields,
• every component matters to the assertion, so there is nothing incidental to leave random,
• and it is built in few enough places that a signature change is a small edit.

Entities, DTOs, and request or response payloads fail the first condition however few fields they have today — generate those. When in doubt, generate: over-using Fixture Monkey costs a few lines, under-using it costs an edit to every call site the day the type grows.

The judgement is per type, not per file — a test can construct a small value object directly and still generate the aggregate it goes into.

Diff stability

These are what make narrow pinning pay off:

• Type-safe selectors, never strings. A rename becomes a compile error at the production site; the test needs no edit.
• Never assert a value you did not pin. Read it back: assertThat(saved.getName()).isEqualTo(user.getName()), not a hardcoded "John".
• Never compare a whole object to a fully constructed expected value. That breaks the moment anyone adds a field. Assert the properties the case is about.
• Derive indexes and sizes, never hardcode them. getLast() or size() - 1, not get(35) — a hardcoded index couples every case to a production constant, so changing it breaks several tests at once with no clue why.
• Do not pin "just in case." Every pin is a line a future refactor may have to touch.

Anti-patterns

Anti-pattern	Instead
Setting every field	Pin only what step 5 selects
One test per input value instead of per outcome	Group by the case list from step 3
giveMeBuilder(...).sample() with no pins	giveMeOne(Type.class)
Mutating the object after sample()	Pin on the builder
fixed() to stabilise a flaky test	Pin the property that matters, or report the bug
setPostCondition where set would do	set with an Arbitrary
Hand-constructing objects alongside Fixture Monkey	Generate both
Editing production code to make a fixture work	Change the introspector or instantiate; if truly blocked, ask
Fixing a bug the new test exposed	Report it and leave the test failing
Reaching for FailoverIntrospector by default	Pick the one matching introspector; override odd types individually
A helper that just renames a selector	Inline javaGetter(Type::prop). A shared path prefix is fine — the call site still shows the leaf
Wrapping every pre-built value in Values.just	Only when that exact instance is what the case is about
Configuration the outcome depends on hidden in a shared holder	Declare the FixtureMonkey in the test class
Restating a production validation annotation as an Arbitrary in the test	Add the validation plugin and let the annotation drive generation

Example

Method: DiscountPolicy.calculate(Order) — 10% off when quantity is 10 or more.

Step 2 lists: below threshold, at threshold, above threshold, empty order, null price. Step 3 keeps the three boundary cases and the empty order; "above threshold" and "well above threshold" collapse into one. Step 5, for the at-threshold case: price and quantity force the expected number, so both are pinned — nothing else does.

@Test
void tenItemsGetTenPercentOff() {
    Order order = fixtureMonkey.giveMeBuilder(Order.class)
        .set(javaGetter(Order::getPrice), 1_000L)
        .set(javaGetter(Order::getQuantity), 10)
        .sample();

    Discount discount = discountPolicy.calculate(order);

    assertThat(discount.getAmount()).isEqualTo(1_000L);
}

Not pinned: id, customer, address, timestamps, status — the policy does not read them, and the expected 1,000 is derivable without them.

Reference

This file carries the procedure and the syntax most fixtures need. Two kinds of reference sit outside it.

Bundled with the skill, read with Read — no network needed. ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} expands to an absolute path, so use it rather than a relative path; the working directory is the project, not the skill:

Path	Contents
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/object-construction.md	Introspector per class shape, the three scopes, the failover trap, the diagnosing table. Read it on the symptoms listed under When the object will not build
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/introspector-probe.jsh	Measures which introspectors build a type and what each leaves unwritten
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/print-test-classpath.gradle	Prints a module's test runtime classpath for the probe, without editing the build

Online, for anything beyond both — the single source these rules are maintained in. Use the .md URLs, which serve the source text; dropping the suffix gives the rendered page, wrapped in site navigation you do not need:

• https://naver.github.io/fixture-monkey/docs/agent-guide/api-reference.md
• https://naver.github.io/fixture-monkey/docs/agent-guide/writing-tests.md

WebFetch summarises rather than returning the page verbatim, so ask for the specific thing you need rather than fetching the page generically. For example: "list every instantiate overload with its exact signature", or "give the complete InnerSpec syntax for maps, verbatim".

If the fetch fails — offline, or WebFetch unavailable — do not guess at API surface. Proceed with the tables in this file and the bundled references above, and tell the user which detail you could not look up.