user-story-mapping

name	user-story-mapping
effort	high
description	Use when someone wants to generate a structured user story map directly from existing context — outputting a two-dimensional artifact with backbone activities, steps, tasks, and release slices. Triggers on: "user story map", "story map", "backbone
type	component
scenarios	["Generate a user story map for our onboarding flow — we have a persona and the workflow defined","Build a story map with backbone activities and release slices for our checkout product","Create a two-dimensional story map with MVP and future release tiers","우리 서비스의 유저 스토리 맵 만들어줘","백본 활동과 릴리스 슬라이스를 포함한 스토리 맵 생성해줘"]
compatibility	{"recommended":[],"optional":["think-tool","sequential-thinking"],"remote_mcp_note":"think-tool이 있으면 MVP vs. 미래 릴리스 범위 우선순위 판단 품질이 높아집니다. Claude 설정 → MCP Servers에서 remote SSE 엔드포인트를 추가하세요."}

Standing Mandates

• ALWAYS organize backbone activities by user workflow, not by system or technical layers.
• ALWAYS validate that the backbone represents real user goals before adding tasks.
• NEVER create a story map without a persona anchoring the user perspective.
• NEVER leave all tasks at equal priority — release slices must cut horizontally across the map.

When to Use / When Not to Use

Use when:

• You have persona, workflow, and product context in hand and want a map generated
• Planning MVP vs. future release scope with horizontal release slices
• Visualizing an existing flat backlog as a two-dimensional narrative

Not for:

• Interactive discovery of personas and scope (use user-story-mapping-workshop)
• Authoring individual user stories (use user-story)
• Technical backlog grooming or task breakdown

What Claude Does / What You Do

Claude	You
Generates backbone activities from provided context	Validates activities match actual user workflow
Produces tasks per activity with vertical priority	Confirms priority with the team
Proposes MVP / Release 2 / Future release slices	Approves release scope with stakeholders
Identifies gaps or missing steps in the map	Validates map accuracy with design and engineering

Related Skills

• ../user-story-mapping-workshop/SKILL.md — use when you need facilitation to discover scope and personas
• ../user-story/SKILL.md — tasks from the map become individual user stories
• ../user-story-splitting/SKILL.md — large tasks from the map may need splitting before authoring

Framework Background

See references/framework-overview.md for the Jeff Patton model, anti-patterns, and use criteria.

---

Application

Step 1: Define the Context

Use template.md for the full fill-in structure.

Segment

Who are you building for?

### Segment:
- [Specify the target segment, e.g., "Small business owners using DIY accounting software"]

Quality checks:

• Specific: Not "users" but "enterprise IT admins" or "freelance designers"

---

Persona

Provide details about the persona within this segment (reference skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md).

### Persona:
- [Describe the persona: demographics, behaviors, pains, goals]

Example:

• "Sarah, 35-year-old freelance graphic designer, manages 5-10 client projects at once, struggles with invoicing and payment tracking, wants to spend less time on admin and more time designing"

---

Step 2: Define the Narrative

What is the user trying to accomplish? Frame this as a Jobs-to-be-Done statement (reference skills/jobs-to-be-done/SKILL.md).

### Narrative:
- [Concise narrative of the persona's objective, e.g., "Complete a client project from kickoff to final payment"]

Quality checks:

• Outcome-focused: Not "use the product" but "deliver a client project on time and get paid"
• One sentence: If it takes more than one sentence, the scope may be too broad

---

Step 3: Identify Activities (Backbone)

List 3-5 high-level activities the persona engages in to fulfill the narrative. These form the backbone of your map.

### Activities:
1. [Activity 1, e.g., "Negotiate project scope and pricing"]
2. [Activity 2, e.g., "Execute design work"]
3. [Activity 3, e.g., "Deliver final assets to client"]
4. [Activity 4, e.g., "Send invoice and receive payment"]
5. [Activity 5, optional]

Quality checks:

• Sequential: Activities happen in order (left-to-right)
• User actions: Describe what the user does, not what the product provides
• 3-5 activities: Too few = oversimplified, too many = overwhelming

Parallelism note: Once activities are confirmed, steps for each activity can be generated concurrently. Similarly, once steps are finalized, tasks for each step across all activities can be generated in parallel.

---

Step 4: Break Activities into Steps

For each activity, list 3-5 steps that detail how the activity is carried out.

### Steps:

**For Activity 1: [Activity Name]**
- Step 1: [Detail step 1, e.g., "Review client brief"]
- Step 2: [Detail step 2, e.g., "Draft project proposal"]
- Step 3: [Detail step 3, e.g., "Negotiate timeline and budget"]
- Step 4: [Optional step 4]
- Step 5: [Optional step 5]

**For Activity 2: [Activity Name]**
- Step 1: [Detail step 1]
- Step 2: [Detail step 2]
...

Quality checks:

• Actionable: Each step is something the user does
• Observable: You could watch someone perform this step
• Logical sequence: Steps follow a natural order

---

Step 5: Break Steps into Tasks

For each step, list 5-7 tasks that must be completed.

### Tasks:

**For Activity 1, Step 1: [Step Name]**
- Task 1: [Detail task 1, e.g., "Read client brief document"]
- Task 2: [Detail task 2, e.g., "Identify key deliverables"]
- Task 3: [Detail task 3, e.g., "Note budget constraints"]
- Task 4: [Detail task 4, e.g., "Clarify timeline expectations"]
- Task 5: [Detail task 5, e.g., "List open questions for client"]
- Task 6: [Optional task 6]
- Task 7: [Optional task 7]

**For Activity 1, Step 2: [Step Name]**
- Task 1: [Detail task 1]
...

Quality checks:

• Granular: Tasks are small, specific actions
• User-facing or behind-the-scenes: Include both (e.g., "Send email" and "Receive confirmation")
• Prioritizable: You'll prioritize tasks vertically (top = essential, bottom = nice-to-have)

---

Step 6: Prioritize Vertically

Arrange tasks top-to-bottom by priority:

• Top rows: MVP / Release 1 (must-have)
• Middle rows: Release 2 (important but not critical)
• Bottom rows: Future / Nice-to-have

Draw horizontal "release lines" to demarcate scope.

If think-tool is available, invoke it now: reason about trade-offs in MVP vs. future-release scope before committing to the vertical prioritization.

---

Step 7: Identify Gaps and Opportunities

Review the map and ask:

• Are there missing steps or tasks?
• Are there pain points we're not addressing?
• Are there opportunities to delight users?
• Do all activities flow logically?

If sequential-thinking is available, invoke it now: re-read the completed map step by step and reason about missing steps, logical discontinuities, or activities that may be miscategorized before finalizing output.

---

Output Format

Use template.md as the canonical output structure. Render the map as follows:

• Place Segment, Persona, and Narrative at the top before the backbone
• Render activities as ### headers
• Render steps as - bullets under each activity header
• Render tasks as indented - bullets with release labels (MVP / Release 2 / Future)

---

Examples

See examples/sample.md for a full story map example.

---

Common Pitfalls

See references/pitfalls.md for symptom/consequence/fix patterns when map quality is low.

---

References

Related Skills

• skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md — Defines the persona for the story map
• skills/jobs-to-be-done/SKILL.md — Informs the narrative and activities
• skills/user-story/SKILL.md — Tasks from the map become user stories
• skills/problem-statement/SKILL.md — Problem statement frames the narrative

External Frameworks

• Jeff Patton, User Story Mapping (2014) — Origin of the story mapping technique
• Teresa Torres, Continuous Discovery Habits (2021) — Opportunity solution trees (complementary to story maps)

Provenance

• Adapted from prompts/user-story-mapping.md in the https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-prompts repo.