Skip to main content

simplifying-control-flow

Flatten nested conditionals with early returns or table-driven methods - keep nesting depth under 3 levels

Datos de origen

Repositorio
obra/clank
Última actividad en el origen
7 de octubre de 2025 a las 17:04
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
41
Forks
27

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
Simplifying Control Flow
description
Flatten nested conditionals with early returns or table-driven methods - keep nesting depth under 3 levels
when_to_use
When writing conditional logic. When nesting depth exceeds 2-3 levels. When multiple conditions determine outcome. When similar if/else patterns repeat. When business rules encoded in nested ifs. When control flow is hard to follow. When nested if statements exist. When adding new cases requires deep surgery.
version
1.0.0
languages
all
# Simplifying Control Flow ## Overview Nested conditionals are hard to understand and error-prone. Flatten them. **Core principle:** Nesting depth < 3 levels. Use early returns, table-driven methods, or extracted conditions. ## Baseline Violation **Agents create nested if/else for multi-condition logic:** ❌ **Nested (baseline):** ```python def calculate_discount(order_amount, is_vip): if is_vip: if order_amount > 1000: return 0.20 elif order_amount > 500: return 0.15 else: if order_amount > 1000: return 0.10 elif order_amount > 500: return 0.05 return 0.0 ``` **Problems:** Duplicated logic, hard to see all tiers, adding tier requires finding nesting spot. ## Three Techniques ### 1. Flatten with Combined Conditions ✅ **All at same level:** ```python def calculate_discount(order_amount, is_vip): if is_vip and order_amount > 1000: return 0.20 if is_vip and order_amount > 500: return 0.15 if order_amount > 1000: return 0.10 if order_amount > 500: return 0.05 return 0.0 ``` ### 2. Table-Driven (Best for Data) ✅ **Business rules as data:** ```python DISCOUNT_TIERS = [ (1000, 0.20, 0.10), # min_amount, vip_rate, regular_rate (500, 0.15, 0.05), ] def calculate_discount(order_amount, is_vip): for min_amount, vip_rate, regular_rate in DISCOUNT_TIERS: if order_amount > min_amount: return vip_rate if is_vip else regular_rate return 0.0 ``` **When to use:** Pricing tiers, status transitions, configuration-driven logic. ### 3. Extract Complex Conditions ✅ **Named boolean for clarity:** ```python def is_eligible(user, minimum): return (user.age >= 18 and user.verified_email and user.balance > minimum and not user.suspended) if is_eligible(user, minimum_purchase): allow_purchase() ``` **When to use:** Complex boolean expressions, reused conditions. ## Quick Reference | Problem | Solution | |---------|----------| | Nested if/else | Flatten with combined conditions OR table-driven | | Deep nesting (>3) | Extract inner logic to function | | Complex boolean | Extract to named function | | Business rules | Table-driven method | | Long if/elif chain | Table lookup OR polymorphism | ## Guard Clauses **Baseline showed agents already use these well:** ```python def validate(data): if not data: return False, "data required" # Early return if data.amount <= 0: return False, "amount must be positive" # Early return # Main logic here (no nesting) ``` **Keep using this pattern for validation and error cases.** ## Red Flags - Nesting depth > 3 - Can't see matching braces without scrolling - Duplicate conditions in nested blocks - Adding new case touches multiple nesting levels **Fix:** Flatten or use table-driven. ## Real-World Impact From baseline: - Agents created 2-level nesting for 4 discount tiers - With table-driven: All tiers visible, easy to add/modify ## Integration with Other Skills **For complex functions:** See skills/keeping-routines-focused - extract when nesting gets deep **For reducing complexity:** See skills/architecture/reducing-complexity - simpler control flow = less complexity
Ver en GitHub