Skip to main content

antigravity-skill-orchestrator

Implements intelligent antigravity skill orchestrator with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
paulpas/agent-skill-router
Última actividad en el origen
4 de junio de 2026 a las 23:31
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
6
Forks
0

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
antigravity-skill-orchestrator
compatibility
opencode
completeness
95
content-types
["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
description
Implements intelligent antigravity skill orchestrator with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license
MIT
maturity
stable
metadata
{"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"antigravity-skill-orchestrator, antigravity skill orchestrator, how do i antigravity-skill-orchestrator, orchestrate antigravity-skill-orchestrator, automate antigravity-skill-orchestrator, agent antigravity-skill-orchestrator","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
version
1.0.0
# Antigravity Skill Orchestrator Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for antigravity skill orchestrator workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability. ## TL;DR Checklist - [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2) - [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1) - [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4) - [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3) - [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions - [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail - [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection - [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ## When to Use Use this skill when: - Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation - Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores - Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions - Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution - Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution - Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting - Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks ## When NOT to Use Avoid this skill for: - Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead - High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive - Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements - Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable ## Core Workflow 1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. **Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding. 2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm: - Text similarity between request and skill triggers - Historical success rate for similar tasks - Skill availability and health status - Required dependencies and their availability **Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold. 3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. **Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated. 4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. **Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail. 5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain: - Retry with adjusted parameters - Try alternative skill from `related-skills` - Defer to human operator for critical tasks **Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata. ## Implementation Patterns ### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic ```python def select_antigravity_module( payload_mass: float, target_altitude: float, available_modules: List[Dict], stability_threshold: float = 0.85 ) -> Optional[Dict]: """Select optimal anti-gravity field generator based on mass/altitude constraints. Evaluates modules by: - Thrust-to-weight ratio compatibility - Field harmonic stability under current atmospheric pressure - Historical uptime for similar payload profiles """ if payload_mass <= 0 or target_altitude < 0: raise ValueError("Payload mass and altitude must be positive") scored_modules = [] for mod in available_modules: if mod.get("status") != "online": continue mass_factor = payload_mass / mod["max_load_kg"] altitude_factor = abs(target_altitude - mod["optimal_ceiling_km"]) / mod["ceiling_range_km"] stability = mod["harmonic_stability"] * (1.0 - altitude_factor) if stability >= stability_threshold: scored_modules.append({ "module_id": mod["id"], "score": stability * (1.0 - mass_factor), "estimated_field_lifetime_hrs": mod["coolant_capacity_l"] / (payload_mass * 0.05) }) if not scored_modules: return None scored_modules.sort(key=lambda x: x["score"], reverse=True) return scored_modules[0] ``` ### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback ```python def execute_field_adjustment( selected_module: Dict, payload_config: Dict, max_resonance_cycles: int = 3 ) -> Dict: """Execute anti-gravity field adjustment with harmonic fallback chain. Implements field collapse prevention: - Monitors gravimetric sensors for resonance spikes - Falls back to magnetic suspension if field coherence drops - Deploys emergency ballast if altitude deviation exceeds limits """ if not selected_module or not payload_config: raise ValueError("Module and payload config required for field generation") field_params = _initialize_field_params(selected_module, payload_config) coherence_history = [] for cycle in range(max_resonance_cycles): field_output = _apply_gravitic_field(field_params) coherence = _measure_field_coherence(field_output) coherence_history.append(coherence) if coherence >= 0.90: return { "status": "stable", "module_id": selected_module["id"], "coherence_peak": max(coherence_history), "cycles_used": cycle + 1 } if coherence < 0.60: return _trigger_magnetic_fallback(payload_config) field_params["dampening_coeff"] *= 1.1 return _deploy_emergency_ballast(payload_config, coherence_history) ``` ### MUST DO - Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit) - Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human) - Log all skill selections with full context for auditability - Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability) - Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states - Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing - Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic ### MUST NOT DO - Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score) - Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems - Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution - Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure - Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable - Cache skill selections without considering context changes ## TL;DR Checklist - [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2) - [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1) - [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4) - [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3) - [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions - [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail - [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection - [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning ## TL;DR for Code Generation - Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work - Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects - Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger - Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit) - Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects - Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data - Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic - Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values ## Output Template When applying this skill, produce: 1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores 2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability) 3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies 4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order 5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact 6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios --- --- ## Constraints ### MUST DO - Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation - Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors - Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach - Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing ### MUST NOT DO - Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible - Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler - Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only - Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies ## Live References > Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content. - [Design Patterns: Orchestrator Pattern](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/orchestrator-choreography>) - [Microservices Orchestration vs Choreography (Martin Fowler)](<https://martinfowler.com/articles/choreographyVsOrchestration.html>) - [Saga Pattern for Distributed Transactions](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/saga/saga>) - [Distributed Systems Patterns Overview](<https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs6410/2018sp/patterns.html>) - [Event-Driven Architecture Patterns](<https://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/>) ## Related Skills | Skill | Purpose | |
Ver en GitHub