- name
- antigravity-skill-orchestrator
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent antigravity skill orchestrator with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"antigravity-skill-orchestrator, antigravity skill orchestrator, how do i antigravity-skill-orchestrator, orchestrate antigravity-skill-orchestrator, automate antigravity-skill-orchestrator, agent antigravity-skill-orchestrator","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Antigravity Skill Orchestrator
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for antigravity skill orchestrator workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def select_antigravity_module(
payload_mass: float,
target_altitude: float,
available_modules: List[Dict],
stability_threshold: float = 0.85
) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Select optimal anti-gravity field generator based on mass/altitude constraints.
Evaluates modules by:
- Thrust-to-weight ratio compatibility
- Field harmonic stability under current atmospheric pressure
- Historical uptime for similar payload profiles
"""
if payload_mass <= 0 or target_altitude < 0:
raise ValueError("Payload mass and altitude must be positive")
scored_modules = []
for mod in available_modules:
if mod.get("status") != "online":
continue
mass_factor = payload_mass / mod["max_load_kg"]
altitude_factor = abs(target_altitude - mod["optimal_ceiling_km"]) / mod["ceiling_range_km"]
stability = mod["harmonic_stability"] * (1.0 - altitude_factor)
if stability >= stability_threshold:
scored_modules.append({
"module_id": mod["id"],
"score": stability * (1.0 - mass_factor),
"estimated_field_lifetime_hrs": mod["coolant_capacity_l"] / (payload_mass * 0.05)
})
if not scored_modules:
return None
scored_modules.sort(key=lambda x: x["score"], reverse=True)
return scored_modules[0]
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_field_adjustment(
selected_module: Dict,
payload_config: Dict,
max_resonance_cycles: int = 3
) -> Dict:
"""Execute anti-gravity field adjustment with harmonic fallback chain.
Implements field collapse prevention:
- Monitors gravimetric sensors for resonance spikes
- Falls back to magnetic suspension if field coherence drops
- Deploys emergency ballast if altitude deviation exceeds limits
"""
if not selected_module or not payload_config:
raise ValueError("Module and payload config required for field generation")
field_params = _initialize_field_params(selected_module, payload_config)
coherence_history = []
for cycle in range(max_resonance_cycles):
field_output = _apply_gravitic_field(field_params)
coherence = _measure_field_coherence(field_output)
coherence_history.append(coherence)
if coherence >= 0.90:
return {
"status": "stable",
"module_id": selected_module["id"],
"coherence_peak": max(coherence_history),
"cycles_used": cycle + 1
}
if coherence < 0.60:
return _trigger_magnetic_fallback(payload_config)
field_params["dampening_coeff"] *= 1.1
return _deploy_emergency_ballast(payload_config, coherence_history)
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Design Patterns: Orchestrator Pattern](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/orchestrator-choreography>)
- [Microservices Orchestration vs Choreography (Martin Fowler)](<https://martinfowler.com/articles/choreographyVsOrchestration.html>)
- [Saga Pattern for Distributed Transactions](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/saga/saga>)
- [Distributed Systems Patterns Overview](<https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs6410/2018sp/patterns.html>)
- [Event-Driven Architecture Patterns](<https://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/>)
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
Ver en GitHub