Skip to main content

exploring-mcp-tool-quality

Investigate the quality of PostHog MCP tool calls — error rates, latency, reach, and which tools are failing or slow. Use when the user asks "which MCP tool has the highest error rate?", "what's the slowest tool?", "which tools fail most often?", "how reliable is tool X?", wants a tool-quality matrix, or pastes an MCP analytics tool-quality / dashboard URL and asks what it shows.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
PostHog/ai-plugin
Última actividad en el origen
25 de septiembre de 2026 a las 12:17
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
95
Forks
20

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
exploring-mcp-tool-quality
description
Investigate the quality of PostHog MCP tool calls — error rates, latency, reach, and which tools are failing or slow. Use when the user asks "which MCP tool has the highest error rate?", "what's the slowest tool?", "which tools fail most often?", "how reliable is tool X?", wants a tool-quality matrix, or pastes an MCP analytics tool-quality / dashboard URL and asks what it shows.
# Exploring MCP tool quality Any MCP server instrumented with PostHog's MCP analytics SDK emits a `$mcp_tool_call` event on the shared `events` table every time an agent invokes a tool. There is **no dedicated ClickHouse table** — every field lives as a `$mcp_*` property on `events`, and every tool-quality metric (error rate, latency percentiles, reach) is an aggregation over this one event. This is the data behind the MCP analytics dashboard and tool-quality screens. ## Governed metric first For any MCP failure-rate headline, call `posthog:metric-list` before a typed tool or SQL recipe and look for `mcp_tool_call_fail_pct`. If it is approved and not drifted, run it with `posthog:data-catalog-metric-run` and use that result as the canonical headline. When the user also asks which tools drive failures, run the headline first, then use the workflows below for the breakdown and label that breakdown noncanonical. If no governed metric matches, state that the catalog has no match and label the derived rate noncanonical. **For a single tool, prefer the typed tools** — `posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` (calls, errors, p50/p95, users, sessions, intents), `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures` (top error messages by harness), and `posthog:query-mcp-tool-daily-stats` (day-by-day trend). Each takes a `toolName` + `dateRange`, runs the same query runner as the tool-detail UI — no hand-written SQL needed. **HogQL via `posthog:execute-sql` is the path for cross-tool questions** — the "which tool errors most" ranking below has no typed tool, so rank with SQL, then drill into the worst tool with `posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats` and `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures`. The full property schema and the established query recipes live in the shared MCP data reference: [`products/posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md`](../../../posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md). That reference is the single source of truth for the `$mcp_*` schema and the effective-tool-name idiom used below — this skill inlines only the noncanonical "which tool errors most" breakdown for convenience; pull the matrix, latency, and harness recipes from the reference rather than re-deriving them. Read it before writing queries. ## The two rules that matter most - **Always use the effective tool name.** New-SDK events wrap the real tool in a single-exec call, so grouping on raw `$mcp_tool_name` collapses everything under the wrapper. Use: ```sql coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name)) ``` - **Always read `$mcp_is_error` via `toBool(...)`** and cast `$mcp_duration_ms` via `toFloat(...)`. The properties are strings. Always set a time range — these queries scan `events` otherwise. ## Workflow: which tool has the highest error rate (noncanonical breakdown) For the "which tool errors most" breakdown, rank tools by error rate, but guard against small-sample noise with a `HAVING` floor on call volume: ```sql posthog:execute-sql SELECT coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name)) AS tool, count() AS total_calls, countIf(toBool(properties.$mcp_is_error)) AS errors, round(countIf(toBool(properties.$mcp_is_error)) * 100.0 / count(), 1) AS error_rate_pct FROM events WHERE event = '$mcp_tool_call' AND coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name)) != '' AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY GROUP BY tool HAVING total_calls >= 20 ORDER BY error_rate_pct DESC, total_calls DESC LIMIT 20 ``` Report both **rate and volume** — a 100% error rate over 3 calls is rarely the real story; a 12% rate over 50,000 calls is. Offer to pull the top `$mcp_error_message` values for the worst tool (see below). ## Workflow: tool-quality matrix One row per tool with error rate, latency percentiles, and reach — mirrors the tool-quality screen. The ready-to-run query is in [models-mcp.md](../../../posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md) under "Tool-quality matrix". ## Workflow: why is a tool failing For one tool's top failure buckets (grouped by harness), call `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures` with the `toolName` — it's the typed equivalent of the query below. Failures come from the **same source as the error rate**: errored `$mcp_tool_call` events (`$mcp_is_error`), scoped by the effective tool name. Failures are grouped by `$mcp_error_type` (a semantic bucket: `internal`, `validation`, `api_4xx`, `api_5xx`, `permission`, `timeout`, `rate_limited`, `missing_context`) and the HTTP `$mcp_error_status` when present. To see individual errored calls inside a bucket — with the captured `$mcp_error_message`, session id, harness, and intent — pass the bucket's raw `error_type`/`error_status` to `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failure-occurrences` (`$mcp_error_message` is empty on events captured before message capture shipped): ```sql posthog:execute-sql SELECT concat( coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_error_type), ''), 'unknown'), if(empty(coalesce(toString(properties.$mcp_error_status), '')), '', concat(' (HTTP ', coalesce(toString(properties.$mcp_error_status), ''), ')')) ) AS failure, count() AS n FROM events WHERE event = '$mcp_tool_call' AND toBool(properties.$mcp_is_error) AND coalesce(nullIf(toString(properties.$mcp_exec_tool_call_name), ''), toString(properties.$mcp_tool_name)) = '<tool>' AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY GROUP BY failure ORDER BY n DESC LIMIT 10 ``` `$mcp_error_type` is only populated on newer SDK/server paths — a chunk of errored calls carry neither type nor status and fall into the `unknown` bucket. ## Workflow: slowest tools Swap the aggregate for latency percentiles (`quantile(0.95)(toFloat(properties.$mcp_duration_ms))`) and order by `p95_ms`. The matrix query already returns `p50_ms` / `p95_ms`. ## Constructing UI links - **Dashboard**: `https://app.posthog.com/project/<project_id>/mcp-analytics/dashboard` - **Tool quality**: `https://app.posthog.com/project/<project_id>/mcp-analytics/tool-quality` Always surface a UI link so the user can verify visually. ## Tips - Report error rate **and** call volume together; a `HAVING total_calls >= N` floor stops tools with very few calls from topping the list spuriously - Exclude errored calls from latency percentiles only when asked — failed calls are often the slow ones, and dropping them hides the problem - `$mcp_client_name` lets you cut quality by harness (Claude Code vs Cursor vs …); the canonical bucketing `multiIf` is in [models-mcp.md](../../../posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/models-mcp.md) - Harness bucketing is resolved **server-side** by `products/mcp_analytics/backend/mcp_harness.py` — that's the source of truth, and `posthog:query-mcp-harness-breakdown` runs it. If your hand-written SQL disagrees with the screen, your bucketing has drifted from `mcp_harness.py`; prefer the typed tool over re-deriving it ## Related skills - [`exploring-mcp-sessions`](../exploring-mcp-sessions/SKILL.md) — drill into a single agent run and its tool sequence - [`exploring-mcp-intent-clusters`](../exploring-mcp-intent-clusters/SKILL.md) — group agent goals and see which intents drive the errors
Ver en GitHub