Skip to main content
Ejecuta cualquier Skill en Manus
con un clic
$pwd:
provos
GitHub creator profile

provos

Repository-level view of 7 collected skills across 1 GitHub repositories, including approximate occupation coverage.

skills collected
7
repositories
1
occupation fields
2
updated
2026-05-20
occupation focus
Major fields detected across this creator.
repository explorer

Repositories and representative skills

#001
ironcurtain
7 skills47962updated 2026-05-20
100% of creator
harness-design-fuzzing
Analistas de garantía de calidad de software y probadores

Reference vocabulary for designing instrumented harnesses that drive vulnerability discovery — design classes (trigger-driven vs coverage-driven), tiered scope (T1 isolated function / T2 multi-component / T3 full build), systematic input exploration, the two-coverage distinction (fuzzer-feedback vs audit), existing-fuzzer selection (libFuzzer / AFL++ / Jazzer / atheris / `go test -fuzz`), seed-corpus discipline, diagnostic checkpoints, common pitfalls, and design-document scope. Read when designing or reviewing a harness specification. Stays neutral on language and stack — pulls in the relevant surface skill (e.g. `memory-safety-c-cpp`) for bug-class taxonomy.

2026-05-20
vulnerability-triage
Analistas de seguridad de la información

Reference vocabulary for interpreting vulnerability findings — detector-vs-impact distinction, severity anchoring on demonstrated evidence, the eleven-item interpretation rubric, delegation transparency, primitive-extent scaling, the disqualifier taxonomy (D-0..D-4), CVSS Achievable / Environmental framing, hedging-phrase elimination, and falsification asymmetry. Read when interpreting a finding to decide whether the demonstrated evidence supports the severity it would warrant. Surface-neutral; pulls in the relevant surface skill (e.g. `memory-safety-c-cpp`) for bug-class-specific exploitability factors.

2026-05-20
memory-safety-c-cpp
Analistas de seguridad de la información

Reference vocabulary for memory-safety vulnerabilities in native C/C++ code — bug-class taxonomy, common arithmetic patterns that lead to corruption, dispatch-family discipline, type-confusion idioms, use-after-free patterns, and exploitability factors. Read when analyzing, hypothesizing, designing harnesses for, or triaging findings against C/C++ code with sanitizer support (ASAN/UBSAN/TSAN/MSan). Not applicable to managed runtimes (JVM, .NET) or scripting languages — those have their own skills.

2026-05-10
email-formatting
Secretarios y asistentes administrativos (excepto legal, médico y ejecutivo)

Markdown formatting conventions for email summary documents — heading depth, list style, line length, emoji policy, and a mandatory provenance footer. Read this when producing a markdown report that summarizes one or more email messages so the output matches the project's house style.

2026-05-01
gmail-query-syntax
Desarrolladores de software

Reference for Gmail's search query syntax — operators like is:sent, newer_than:, from:, has:attachment, label:, and how they compose. Read this when constructing a Gmail search query string for the google_workspace.gmail_search_messages Code Mode call, especially when filtering by sent vs received, recency, sender, or labels.

2026-05-01
json-schema-emails
Desarrolladores de software

Canonical shape of the .workflow/emails/emails.json file passed between the fetch and summarize states — required fields (sender, recipient, subject, date, body), types, and field semantics. Read this whenever you write or read emails.json so producer and consumer agree on the shape.

2026-05-01
summary-style-guide
Secretarios y asistentes administrativos (excepto legal, médico y ejecutivo)

Tone and length conventions for email summaries — voice, verb tense, what to include vs omit, and target sentence count. Read this when writing the prose Summary line for each email so the voice is consistent across the report.

2026-05-01
Mostrando 1 de 1 repositorios
Todos los repositorios cargados