Skip to main content

triage-rendercv-issue

Analyze a newly opened GitHub issue, comment with findings and an action plan, and offer to open a PR.

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
rendercv/rendercv
Última actividad en el origen
20 de marzo de 2026 a las 23:05
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
17.592
Forks
1356

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
triage-rendercv-issue
description
Analyze a newly opened GitHub issue, comment with findings and an action plan, and offer to open a PR.
# Triage a RenderCV Issue Analyze a newly opened issue on the `rendercv/rendercv` repository. Post a helpful comment that demonstrates understanding of the problem and offers next steps. ## Step 1: Read the issue Get the full issue details including all comments: ```bash gh issue view <number> --repo rendercv/rendercv --comments ``` Determine: - Is this a bug report, feature request, question, or something else? - Is there enough information to understand and reproduce the problem? - Is this a duplicate of an existing issue? Check for duplicates: ```bash gh issue list --repo rendercv/rendercv --state all --search "<key terms from issue>" --json number,title,state --limit 10 ``` ## Step 2: Understand the relevant code Familiarize yourself with the project architecture and the specific area the issue relates to: - @.claude/skills/rendercv-development-context/SKILL.md Read the architecture and source structure sections, then explore the specific source files and tests related to the issue. ## Step 3: Post a comment Comment on the issue using `gh`: ```bash gh issue comment <number> --repo rendercv/rendercv --body "$(cat <<'EOF' <comment content> EOF )" ``` ### Comment structure 1. **Understanding**: Restate the problem in your own words to confirm you understand it. 2. **Analysis**: Which files and modules are involved, what the current behavior is, and why the issue occurs (or what would need to change for a feature request). 3. **Proposed approach**: Concrete steps to fix or implement this, referencing specific files and functions. 4. **What to avoid**: Approaches that would be wrong, overly complex, or against the project's conventions. 5. **Offer**: End with: _"Reply `@claude` followed by your instructions if you'd like me to open a PR for this."_ ### Guidelines - Be concise and specific. Reference actual file paths. - If the issue is unclear or missing information, ask clarifying questions instead of guessing. - If it's a duplicate, out of scope, or `wontfix` material, explain why politely and suggest closing. - If it's a question (not a bug or feature), answer it directly. - Follow the project's conventions from the development context when discussing the approach. - Don't promise timelines or complexity estimates. - Don't label or assign the issue unless explicitly asked.
Ver en GitHub