better-init

name	better-init
description	Create or modify repository guidance through GitHub Copilot CLI, including guidance consumed by Copilot code review. Use when asked to initialize, bootstrap, refresh, reorganize, or generate AGENTS.md, Copilot instructions, path-specific instructions, project skills, code-review guidance, or custom agents. Do not use for requests that only read or explain existing guidance.

Better Init

Create the smallest durable set of repository guidance that helps Copilot work correctly. Every line should answer: "Would an agent likely miss this without help?" If not, leave it out.

1. Honor the requested scope

Apply any user-provided focus or constraints first. If the user names a package, workflow, instruction type, or path, prioritize it.

Do not ask questions before inspecting the repository unless the request is impossible to interpret. Improve existing /init output in place when present; do not assume an uninitialized repository.

2. Investigate before writing

Read the highest-value sources first:

• Root manifests, workspace configuration, lockfiles, task runners, and toolchain configuration.
• Build, lint, formatter, typecheck, test, migration, and code-generation configuration.
• CI workflows, pre-commit configuration, and contributor documentation.
• Pull request templates, ownership rules, review checklists, and configured MCP integrations that provide issue, incident, or service context.
• Existing AGENTS.md, nested instruction files, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, and .github/instructions.
• Existing project skills under .github/skills, .agents/skills, or .claude/skills, and custom agents under .github/agents.
• Representative entrypoints and package boundaries when configuration and documentation do not make the architecture clear.

Prefer executable configuration over prose. When sources conflict, keep only facts that can be verified and correct stale guidance rather than duplicating it.

For a large monorepo or an unclear architecture, delegate repository-wide discovery to the repo-instruction-researcher custom agent. Give it the user's focus and ask for source paths. Continue directly for small repositories where delegation would add overhead.

3. Extract only high-signal facts

Capture:

• Exact setup, development, build, lint, format, typecheck, test, migration, code-generation, and narrow validation commands.
• Required command order, working directories, services, environment loading, or expensive and flaky suites.
• Monorepo boundaries, ownership of major directories, real entrypoints, and generated-code boundaries.
• Repository-specific conventions that differ from ecosystem defaults.
• Safety, approval, release, or review constraints.
• Existing guidance worth preserving and reusable workflows that deserve on-demand instructions.

Do not add generic advice, restate obvious framework conventions, inventory every directory, or encode speculative preferences.

4. Choose the correct instruction surface

Use each surface only for content it owns:

AGENTS.md

Put portable repository facts here:

• Project structure and package boundaries.
• Exact developer and validation commands.
• Repository-specific conventions and safety constraints.
• A short inventory of important project skills when discoverability would otherwise be poor.

Prefer a root AGENTS.md for repository-wide guidance. Add nested AGENTS.md files only at real subsystem boundaries where local commands or constraints would clutter the root.

Keep the root guide concise, usually 200-400 words. Larger repositories may need slightly more, but should link to deeper documentation rather than copying it.

.github/copilot-instructions.md

Put only Copilot-specific operating behavior here, such as tool-use policy, Copilot workflow requirements, or instructions relying on Copilot features.

Do not copy AGENTS.md into this file or add @AGENTS.md; Copilot discovers AGENTS.md independently. Omit this file when there is no meaningful Copilot-only guidance.

.github/instructions/*.instructions.md

Use path-specific instructions when guidance applies only to matching files. Include applyTo frontmatter with the narrowest useful glob. Do not use these files for repository-wide rules or create them merely to mirror directories.

.github/skills/<name>/SKILL.md

Create a project skill for a repeatable multi-step workflow that is useful only for certain tasks, such as repository setup verification, release preparation, migrations, or creating a package.

Each skill must:

• Use a lowercase kebab-case directory and matching name.
• Have a specific description stating what it does and when to use it.
• Contain an actionable workflow rather than general guidance.
• Keep scripts in scripts/, detailed references in references/, and templates in assets/.
• Avoid duplicating an existing skill or normal agent behavior.

Prefer .github/skills for new Copilot-focused project skills. Preserve existing .agents/skills or .claude/skills layouts unless migration is explicitly requested.

Copilot code-review skills

When the repository has non-obvious, repeatable review requirements, create .github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md. Use this exact review-focused directory name so GitHub Copilot code review is more likely to load the skill.

Good candidates include:

• Security, compatibility, migration, generated-artifact, or API-contract checks tied to identifiable paths.
• Required narrow validation commands or changed-file checks that reviewers would not reliably infer from standard tooling.
• Rules for consulting issue, incident, service-catalog, or other context through an MCP server already configured for the repository.

The skill must tell the reviewer what evidence to inspect, which checks to run or reason through, and when a finding is actionable. Keep general coding standards in repository instructions instead. Do not create a generic review checklist that merely says to look for bugs, security issues, tests, or style. Do not assume an MCP server exists; name MCP context or tools only when verified from repository configuration or explicitly requested by the user.

Remember that GitHub Copilot code review reads instructions and skills from the pull request's head branch. The generated skill must therefore be self-contained and must not depend on an uncommitted local file or a plugin-only resource.

.github/agents/<name>.agent.md

Create a custom agent only when a specialist role benefits from an independent context window, distinct tools, or repeatable delegation. Examples include a framework-specific reviewer or a repository-specific release investigator.

Do not create an agent when a skill or concise instruction is sufficient. Restrict its tools to the minimum needed and disable automatic model invocation when it should only run deliberately.

Compatibility files

Keep a root CLAUDE.md as exactly @AGENTS.md when that shim already exists or the user requests it. Do not generate harness-specific duplicates by default.

5. Reconcile and write

Before editing:

1. Assign each verified fact to one owning surface.
2. Remove or consolidate duplicated and conflicting guidance.
3. Preserve useful user-authored constraints and unrelated content.
4. Plan the smallest set of file changes that satisfies the request.

Write direct, imperative guidance. Use headings for scanability, exact paths and commands, and short explanations only where the reason changes behavior.

Do not create all supported file types as a showcase. It is valid for the result to contain only AGENTS.md.

6. Validate the result

• Re-read every changed instruction, skill, and agent file.
• Confirm commands and paths against repository sources.
• Validate frontmatter and JSON with existing repository tooling when available.
• Ensure path-specific globs match their intended files.
• Ensure new skills and agents have unique, matching names and clear triggers.
• For a code-review skill, confirm it is under .github/skills/code-review, contains repository-specific checks, and does not claim unverified MCP access.
• Check that no guidance is duplicated across surfaces without a specific reason.

Finish with a brief summary of files added, changed, or removed and the responsibility of each.