| name | sume-quality-experiment |
| description | Design and run controlled Sume quality experiments with one-variable variants, reusable manifests, side-by-side artifact comparison, and rubric-based sanitized reports. |
Sume Quality Experiment
Use this skill for controlled Avatar or Avatar Video comparisons.
Experiment Rules
- Write a short local manifest before paid calls.
- Change one variable per variant: quality tier, scene prompt, product image,
avatar handle, script, duration, or aspect ratio.
- Keep shared anchors identical across variants.
- Run no-cost checks first: schema discovery, manifest validation, and local
media inspection when outputs already exist.
- Ask for explicit paid approval and a spend cap before paid generation.
- Use idempotency keys and state files so reruns do not duplicate jobs.
Commands
sume tools schema avatar-videos.create --json
sume avatar-videos batch plan ./experiment.videos.json --output-file ./experiment.plan.json --json
sume avatar-videos batch create ./experiment.videos.json --state-file ./experiment.state.json --confirm-paid --json
sume avatar-videos batch watch ./experiment.videos.json --state-file ./experiment.state.json --json
sume avatar-videos batch result ./experiment.videos.json --state-file ./experiment.state.json --json
Use sume-media-qa after results exist if the user needs local files, still
sheets, codec checks, or side-by-side comparison.
Rubric
Score or summarize:
- identity preservation;
- product fidelity;
- script/audio fit;
- scene continuity;
- artifact severity;
- metadata/readback usefulness;
- cost and elapsed time.
Not For
Do not use this skill for unrestricted exploration, raw provider endpoint
tests, or one-off fastest iteration. Use sume-min-latency for speed and
sume-spend-capped-dogfood for paid QA with a strict budget.