[COMMUNITY] Generate GDPR (EU 2016/679) compliance assessment for EU/EEA data processing — legal basis mapping, data subject rights, transfers, DPIA screening, and breach notification across all member states
El comando permanece en una sola línea. Desplázate horizontalmente para revisarlo antes de copiarlo.
¿Prefieres una copia local? Descarga los archivos que SkillsMP tiene disponibles ahora.
Mostrando SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
arckit-eu-rgpd
title
User Input
description
[COMMUNITY] Generate GDPR (EU 2016/679) compliance assessment for EU/EEA data processing — legal basis mapping, data subject rights, transfers, DPIA screening, and breach notification across all member states
⚠️ Community-contributed command — not part of the officially-maintained ArcKit baseline. Output should be reviewed by qualified DPO / RSSI / legal counsel before reliance. Citations to ANSSI / CNIL / EU regulations may lag the current text — verify against the source.
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a GDPR Compliance Assessment (EU 2016/679) for any organisation processing personal data of EU/EEA residents. This command takes a member-state-neutral approach to the EU GDPR baseline. For French-specific CNIL obligations, run $arckit-fr-rgpd after this assessment.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Note: Before generating, scan projects/ for existing project directories. For each project, list all ARC-*.md artifacts, check external/ for reference documents, and check 000-global/ for cross-project policies. If no external docs exist but they would improve output, ask the user.
Step 0: Read existing artifacts from the project context
MANDATORY (warn if missing):
DATA (Data Model) — Extract: all entities with personal data, special category data (Article 9), data subjects, data flows to third parties, retention periods, data classifications
If missing: warn that GDPR assessment requires a data model to identify what personal data is processed and how
RECOMMENDED (read if available, note if missing):
REQ (Requirements) — Extract: data requirements (DR-xxx), compliance requirements (NFR-C-xxx), security requirements (NFR-SEC-xxx), integration points that involve personal data transfer
STKE (Stakeholder Analysis) — Extract: data subject categories, vulnerable groups, organisation's role (controller / processor), RACI for data governance
PRIN (Architecture Principles, 000-global) — Extract: privacy by design principles, data minimisation, retention policies
SECD (Secure by Design) — Extract: security controls relevant to Article 32 assessment
Step 0b: Read external documents and policies
Read any in — extract existing privacy policies, Records of Processing Activities (RoPA), Data Processing Agreements, previous DPIA reports, transfer impact assessments
external documents
external/
Read any global policies in 000-global/policies/ — extract organisational privacy policy, data retention schedule, data classification scheme, DPO mandate
Citation traceability: When referencing content from external documents, follow .arckit/references/citation-instructions.md.
Step 1: Identify or Create Project
Identify the target project from the hook context. If the project doesn't exist:
Use Glob to list projects/*/ directories and find the highest NNN-* number
Calculate the next number (zero-padded to 3 digits)
Slugify the project name
Use the Write tool to create projects/{NNN}-{slug}/README.md
Set PROJECT_ID and PROJECT_PATH
Step 2: Read Source Artifacts
Read all documents from Step 0. Identify:
Role: controller / processor / joint controller (from stakeholder analysis or user input)
Special category data presence (Article 9) → stricter requirements
International transfers → Schrems II / TIA requirements
Data subjects: consumers, employees, patients, children?
Lead supervisory authority: determined by the controller's main establishment
Step 3: GDPR Template Reading
Read the template (with user override support):
First, check if .arckit/templates-custom/eu-rgpd-template.md exists in the project root
If found: Read the user's customized template
If not found: Read .arckit/templates/eu-rgpd-template.md
Step 4: DPIA Screening (Article 35 — Automated)
Based on the data model and requirements, automatically score the EDPB 9 criteria:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✅ GDPR Assessment Generated
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📄 Document: projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v{VERSION}.md
📋 Document ID: {document_id}
📅 Assessment Date: {date}
🔒 Classification: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 Assessment Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Role: {Controller / Processor / Joint Controller}
Lead DPA: {Authority name}
Data Subjects: {Categories}
Special Category Data: {Yes (categories) / No}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔍 DPIA Screening: {N}/9 criteria → {REQUIRED / RECOMMENDED / NOT REQUIRED}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
International Transfers: {N} transfers identified
{List destination countries and mechanisms}
Total Gaps: {N} ({N} high, {N} medium, {N} low)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Next steps:
{If DPIA required: 1. Run $arckit-dpia — DPIA required (2+ criteria met)}
{If French deployment: Run $arckit-fr-rgpd — CNIL-specific requirements}
{If AI: Run $arckit-eu-ai-act — AI and personal data intersection}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Important Notes
Member-state neutral: This command covers EU GDPR only. For French CNIL-specific requirements (cookies, HDS, age of consent 15), run $arckit-fr-rgpd after this assessment.
Legitimate interests for public authorities: Article 6(1)(f) legitimate interests CANNOT be used by public authorities for tasks in the exercise of official authority. Flag this explicitly.
Schrems II is ongoing: Even with the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (DPF), Transfer Impact Assessments remain best practice. DPF is subject to ongoing CJEU challenge.
DPIA is a legal requirement: When 2+ EDPB criteria are met, the DPIA is mandatory before processing starts. Non-compliance can result in supervisory authority enforcement.
Use Write Tool: GDPR assessments are typically 3,000–6,000 words. Always use the Write tool.
✅ Assessment document created at projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RGPD-v{VERSION}.md
✅ Organisation role determined (controller / processor / joint)
✅ Lead supervisory authority identified
✅ All processing activities mapped to Article 6 legal basis
✅ Special category data mapped to Article 9 conditions
✅ EDPB 9-criteria DPIA screening completed
✅ Data subject rights implementation assessed (Articles 15–22)
✅ International transfers assessed with Schrems II requirements
✅ Processor inventory with DPA compliance checked
✅ 72-hour breach notification process assessed
✅ National supervisory authority map populated
✅ Document classified OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
✅ French deployment flagged for $arckit-fr-rgpd follow-up
Example Usage
$arckit-eu-rgpd Assess GDPR compliance for a French e-commerce platform expanding to Germany and Spain, processing purchase history, behavioural analytics, and email marketing, using AWS eu-west-3 (Paris) with Salesforce Marketing Cloud (US-based processor)
$arckit-eu-rgpd GDPR assessment for 001 — SaaS HR platform operating across 5 EU member states, processing employee data, using US-based payroll sub-processor
$arckit-eu-rgpd Assess GDPR for a healthcare research project processing anonymised patient data across FR, DE, NL — assess whether anonymisation is complete
Suggested Next Steps
After completing this command, consider running:
$arckit-dpia -- Run a full Data Protection Impact Assessment if screening flags 2+ high-risk criteria (when DPIA screening score is 2 or more)
$arckit-fr-rgpd -- Add French CNIL-specific obligations on top of the EU GDPR baseline (when Project processes personal data of French residents or is operated by a French entity)
$arckit-eu-ai-act -- Assess AI Act obligations where AI systems process personal data (when Project uses AI or automated decision-making involving personal data)
