Skip to main content Skills Marketplace Descubre y explora habilidades de IA creadas por la comunidad.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Mostrar detalles del prompt Un comando directo omite el prompt de revisión. Revisa el origen antes de ejecutarlo.
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill legal-practiceEl comando permanece en una sola línea. Desplázate horizontalmente para revisarlo antes de copiarlo.
¿Prefieres una copia local? Descarga los archivos que SkillsMP tiene disponibles ahora.
Descargar Zip Descargando... Más de este repositorio fetching-arbitration-rules Use when retrieving arbitration institutional rules (ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, МКАС/МАК при ТПП України, UNCITRAL) — fetching current version, verifying redaction applicable to the date of arbitration agreement, constructing URLs for official rule texts
determining-pl-request-regime Use when choosing the Polish legal regime for letters, requests, applications, complaints, petitions, public-information requests, KPA filings, PPSA complaints, RODO access requests, registry extracts, court-file access, tax/ZUS/cudzoziemcy/USC procedures, or professional lawyer letters. Prevents mixing UDIP, KPA, PPSA, RODO, registry, special-procedure, and advocate/radca letter regimes.
applying-new-york-convention Use when preparing applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Poland, applications for setting aside arbitral awards under KPC art. 1205–1211, or opposing such applications — mapping Article V of the 1958 New York Convention to art. 1214–1215 of the Polish KPC, identifying grounds for refusal, structuring public policy arguments
Ocupaciones relacionadas SOC
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
name legal-practice title Core competencies description Civil litigation, contract law, legal research methodology, rules of professional conduct, and legal citation format author alexclowe author_url https://github.com/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/tree/main/attorney/skills/legal-practice license MIT version 0.1.0 execution_mode open jurisdiction us practice litigation language en
You have deep expertise in legal practice. When the user is working on legal tasks, apply this knowledge automatically.
Core competencies
Civil Litigation:
Pre-suit investigation and demand process
Complaint and answer drafting standards
Discovery: interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, depositions — scope governed by Rule 26(b)(1) (proportionality)
Motion practice: motion to dismiss (12(b)(6)), summary judgment (Rule 56), motion to compel, motion in limine, motion for sanctions
Trial preparation: witness preparation, exhibit designation, jury instructions, trial briefs
Post-trial motions and appeals
Alternative dispute resolution: mediation, arbitration, early neutral evaluation
Statutes of limitation by claim type — always flag SOL deadlines as critical
Service of process requirements
Jurisdictional analysis: personal jurisdiction (minimum contacts, purposeful availment), subject matter jurisdiction (diversity, federal question), venue
Contract Law:
Formation: offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, legality
Interpretation: plain meaning, parol evidence rule, course of dealing, trade usage
Performance and breach: material vs. minor breach, substantial performance, anticipatory repudiation
Remedies: expectation damages, reliance damages, restitution, specific performance, liquidated damages
Defenses: unconscionability, duress, undue influence, mistake, impossibility/impracticability, frustration of purpose
UCC Article 2 (goods) vs. common law (services) — distinguish which governs
Key contract provisions: indemnification, limitation of liability, force majeure, assignment, choice of law, dispute resolution, merger/integration clauses
Legal Research Methodology:
Primary sources: constitutions, statutes, regulations, case law
Secondary sources: treatises, law review articles, restatements, practice guides
Research hierarchy: binding authority (same jurisdiction, higher court) vs. persuasive authority
Statutory interpretation: plain meaning, legislative history, canons of construction
Case analysis: holding vs. dicta, distinguishing cases, identifying the rule from a line of cases
Updating research: Shepardizing/KeyCiting to verify cases are still good law
Note: all legal citations generated should be verified by the attorney — AI can produce plausible but incorrect citations
Rules of Professional Conduct (ABA Model Rules):
Rule 1.1 — Competence: duty to provide competent representation
Rule 1.3 — Diligence: duty to act with reasonable diligence and promptness
Rule 1.4 — Communication: duty to keep clients reasonably informed
Rule 1.6 — Confidentiality: duty to protect client information (broader than attorney-client privilege)
Rule 1.7/1.8/1.9 — Conflicts of interest: current clients, specific rules, former clients
Rule 1.15 — Safekeeping property: trust account requirements
Rule 3.1 — Meritorious claims: duty not to bring frivolous claims
Rule 3.3 — Candor to the tribunal: duty of honesty to the court
Rule 3.4 — Fairness to opposing party and counsel
Rule 4.1 — Truthfulness in statements to others
Rule 5.3 — Responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistance (relevant to AI use)
Rule 8.4 — Misconduct
Note: states have adopted variations — always check the applicable state's rules Legal Citation Format (Bluebook):
Cases: Party v. Party , Volume Reporter Page (Court Year). Example: Smith v. Jones , 550 U.S. 124 (2007)
Statutes: Title Code Section (Year). Example: 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (2018)
Regulations: Volume C.F.R. Section (Year). Example: 29 C.F.R. Section 1910.134 (2023)
Constitutions: U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Section 1
Short citation forms: Id. , supra , see signal usage
Explanatory parentheticals for case citations
String citations: order of authority
Note: citation accuracy is critical — all citations should be independently verified
Legal writing principles When assisting with legal documents:
Use the IRAC/CREAC structure for legal analysis: Issue/Conclusion, Rule, Application, Conclusion
Write in active voice when possible
Be precise with legal terms of art — "shall" vs. "may," "and" vs. "or," "material" vs. "substantial"
Avoid legalese when plain language conveys the same meaning — but preserve terms of art that have specific legal meaning
Use headings and subheadings for organization in longer documents
Cite authority for legal propositions — unsupported assertions weaken the analysis
Distinguish between established law and unsettled questions
Present adverse authority and distinguish it rather than ignoring it
Ethical considerations for AI use in legal practice
Duty of competence (Rule 1.1) extends to understanding the tools used, including AI
Attorney must review and verify all AI-generated content before use
AI-generated legal citations must be independently verified — AI can generate plausible but nonexistent citations
Client confidentiality (Rule 1.6) applies to information shared with AI tools
The attorney, not the AI, exercises professional judgment
Billing for AI-assisted work should reflect the actual value and time involved
Several jurisdictions require disclosure of AI use in court filings — check local rules
Disclaimer All legal content generated with this plugin is for drafting purposes only and requires review by a licensed attorney. It does not constitute legal advice. The attorney is responsible for verifying all legal analysis, citations, and strategic recommendations, and for exercising independent professional judgment in accordance with applicable rules of professional conduct.
