| name | scim-provisioning |
| description | SCIM (System for Cross-domain Identity Management) 2.0 is a standard Use when this capability is needed. |
| metadata | {"author":"amnadtaowsoam"} |
Scim Provisioning
Skill Profile
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Overview
SCIM (System for Cross-domain Identity Management) 2.0 is a standard protocol for automated user provisioning and deprovisioning. It enables Identity Providers (IdPs) like Okta and Azure AD to push user lifecycle events to your application in real-time, eliminating manual user management and ensuring consistent access control across all enterprise applications.
Why This Matters
- Operational Efficiency: Automates user lifecycle management, saving IT admins hours of manual work
- Security Compliance: Ensures immediate deactivation of departing employees, preventing orphaned accounts
- Data Consistency: Keeps user attributes synchronized across all enterprise applications in real-time
- Enterprise Readiness: SCIM is a standard requirement for large enterprise deals
Core Concepts & Rules
1. Core Principles
- Follow established patterns and conventions
- Maintain consistency across codebase
- Document decisions and trade-offs
2. Implementation Guidelines
- Start with the simplest viable solution
- Iterate based on feedback and requirements
- Test thoroughly before deployment
Inputs / Outputs / Contracts
- Inputs:
- SCIM HTTP requests (POST, PATCH, DELETE)
- Bearer token for authentication
- User/group data in SCIM JSON format
- Filter queries for listing resources
- Entry Conditions:
- Database initialized with users, groups tables
- SSO integration implemented
- Bearer token validation configured
- Outputs:
- SCIM-compliant JSON responses
- Error responses with proper SCIM format
- User/group creation, update, deactivation
- Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
- SCIM server implementation (all required endpoints)
- Database schema for users and groups
- Authentication middleware for bearer tokens
- SCIM filter parser
- IdP configuration documentation
- Acceptance Evidence:
- SCIM test suite passing (Runscope SCIM Validator)
- Integration tests with Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin
- User provisioning/deprovisioning working end-to-end
- Audit logs capturing all SCIM operations
- Success Criteria:
- All SCIM 2.0 required endpoints implemented
- SCIM test suite passes with 100% compliance
- User provisioning works with at least 3 IdPs
- Provisioning success rate > 99%
- Response time < 1 second p95
Skill Composition
- Depends on: SSO (SAML & OIDC), Database Design
- Compatible with: Enterprise RBAC Models, Security Questionnaires, Vendor Onboarding
- Conflicts with: None
- Related Skills: SSO (SAML & OIDC), Enterprise RBAC Models
Quick Start / Implementation Example
- Review requirements and constraints
- Set up development environment
- Implement core functionality following patterns
- Write tests for critical paths
- Run tests and fix issues
- Document any deviations or decisions
def example_function():
pass
Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals
- Assumptions:
- Development environment is properly configured
- Required dependencies are available
- Team has basic understanding of domain
- Constraints:
- Must follow existing codebase conventions
- Time and resource limitations
- Compatibility requirements
- Non-goals:
- This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
- Not a replacement for formal training
Compatibility & Prerequisites
- Supported Versions:
- Python 3.8+
- Node.js 16+
- Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Required AI Tools:
- Code editor (VS Code recommended)
- Testing framework appropriate for language
- Version control (Git)
- Dependencies:
- Language-specific package manager
- Build tools
- Testing libraries
- Environment Setup:
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)
Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)
| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks |
|---|
| Unit | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |
| Integration | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |
| E2E | User Journey | Critical user flows to test |
| Performance | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements |
| Security | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit |
| Frontend | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model
1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)
- Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure
2. Performance & Resources
3. Architecture & Scalability
4. Observability & Reliability
Agent Directives & Error Recovery
(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
- Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
- Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
- Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
- Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.
Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
Anti-patterns / Pitfalls
- ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
- ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
- 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging
Reference Links & Examples
- Internal documentation and examples
- Official documentation and best practices
- Community resources and discussions
Versioning & Changelog
- Version: 1.0.0
- Changelog:
- 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.