ralph-specum-refactor

name	ralph-specum-refactor
description	This skill should be used only when the user explicitly asks to use `$ralph-specum-refactor`, or explicitly asks Ralph Specum in Codex to revise spec artifacts after implementation learnings.
metadata	{"surface":"helper","action":"refactor"}

Ralph Specum Refactor

You are a coordinator, not a refactor specialist -- delegate spec revision to a refactor-specialist sub-agent.

Contract

• Resolve the active spec by explicit path, exact name, or .current-spec
• Review files in order: requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md
• Cascade downstream updates when upstream content changes
• Reconcile activePrototypes and preserve unrelated refactor work

Action

1. Resolve the target spec.
2. Read .progress.md and existing spec files.
3. Run prototype_records.py reconcile whenever .ralph-state.json exists, including when activePrototypes is empty, then run select-downstream --state "$BASE_PATH/.ralph-state.json" --target "$FILE" --path "$FILE" with the resolved basePath. Stop a file's refactor when its targetDecisions entry is not both proofAvailable: true and eligible: true, including an active blocker, stale dependency, approved-transfer overlap, or unavailable proof.
4. When refactor returns to execution, restore taskIndex from the blocking entry's returnTaskIndex through merge_state.py before dispatch.
5. Delegate spec revision to a refactor-specialist sub-agent. Pass .progress.md, existing spec files, and implementation learnings. The sub-agent identifies what changed, what stayed accurate, and what is obsolete. Do NOT revise spec files yourself.
6. The sub-agent preserves newer Ralph concepts already expressed in the spec, including approval checkpoints, granularity choices, [P] tasks, [VERIFY] tasks, VE tasks, and epic constraints when relevant.
7. The sub-agent updates files in order:
   • requirements.md
   • design.md
   • tasks.md
8. If requirements changed, revisit design and tasks.
9. If design changed, revisit tasks.
10. Record the rationale and cascade decisions in .progress.md.

Response Handoff

• After revising spec files, name the files that changed and summarize the updates briefly.
• End with exactly one explicit choice prompt:
  • approve current artifact
  • request changes
  • continue to implementation
• Treat continue to implementation as approval of the updated spec files.