| name | rstan-to-pystan |
| description | Guidance for converting R-Stan (RStan) code to Python-Stan (PyStan). This skill applies when translating Stan models and inference code from R to Python, including API mapping between RStan and PyStan 3.x, hyperparameter translation, and handling differences in output formats. Use this skill for statistical model migration, Bayesian inference code conversion, or when working with Stan models across R and Python ecosystems. |
RStan to PyStan Conversion
This skill provides guidance for converting RStan (R interface to Stan) code to PyStan (Python interface to Stan), focusing on the significant API differences between the two libraries.
Key Insight: Stan Model Code is Language-Agnostic
The Stan modeling language itself is identical between RStan and PyStan. The Stan model code (data blocks, parameters, model, generated quantities) can typically be copied directly. The conversion challenge lies in the wrapper code that:
- Prepares data for the model
- Calls the sampler with correct parameters
- Extracts and processes posterior samples
Pre-Conversion Checklist
Before writing any conversion code:
-
Verify system dependencies for PyStan
- PyStan 3.x requires a C++ compiler (g++ on Linux, clang on macOS)
- Install with:
apt-get install g++ or equivalent
- Missing compiler causes cryptic compilation errors at runtime
-
Identify PyStan version to target
- PyStan 2.x API mirrors RStan closely
- PyStan 3.x has a completely different API (recommended for new projects)
- This guide focuses on PyStan 3.x conversion
-
Read the complete R script before converting
- Identify all hyperparameters used
- Note any data transformations
- Understand the expected output format
Hyperparameter Mapping (RStan to PyStan 3.x)
Create an explicit mapping table before coding:
| RStan Parameter | PyStan 3.x Equivalent | Notes |
|---|
iter | N/A (see calculation) | Total iterations including warmup |
warmup | num_warmup | Number of warmup iterations |
chains | num_chains | Number of MCMC chains |
thin | N/A | PyStan 3 does not support thinning directly |
seed | random_seed | Random seed for reproducibility |
control=list(adapt_delta=X) | N/A | Not directly available in PyStan 3 |
control=list(max_treedepth=X) | N/A | Not directly available in PyStan 3 |
Critical calculation for num_samples:
PyStan num_samples = (RStan iter - RStan warmup) / RStan thin
Example: If RStan uses iter=2000, warmup=1000, thin=2:
- Effective samples = (2000 - 1000) / 2 = 500
- Use
num_samples=500 in PyStan 3
Sample Extraction: Critical API Difference
This is the most common source of errors in conversion.
RStan sample extraction:
samples <- extract(fit)$parameter_name
PyStan 3.x sample extraction:
samples = fit['parameter_name']
Verification approach:
for param in ['rho', 'beta', 'sigma']:
print(f"{param} shape: {fit[param].shape}")
Step-by-Step Conversion Process
Step 1: Analyze the RStan Script
- Extract the Stan model code (between
stan() or in separate .stan file)
- Document all hyperparameters with their values
- Identify data preparation steps
- Note the expected output format and calculations
Step 2: Set Up Python Environment
import subprocess
result = subprocess.run(['g++', '--version'], capture_output=True)
if result.returncode != 0:
raise RuntimeError("g++ not found - install C++ compiler first")
import stan
Step 3: Translate the Stan Model
- Copy Stan model code directly (it's language-agnostic)
- Store as a Python string with proper escaping
- Verify all data block variables match your Python data preparation
Step 4: Prepare Data Dictionary
data = {
'N': len(y),
'K': X.shape[1],
'y': y.tolist(),
'X': X.tolist()
}
Step 5: Build and Sample
posterior = stan.build(stan_code, data=data)
fit = posterior.sample(
num_chains=chains,
num_samples=num_samples,
num_warmup=warmup,
random_seed=seed
)
Step 6: Extract Results with Shape Verification
samples = fit['parameter_name']
print(f"Shape: {samples.shape}")
Common Pitfalls and Solutions
Pitfall 1: Assuming RStan-like sample shapes
- Symptom: Getting 1000 values when expecting 3 (or vice versa)
- Cause: PyStan 3 returns (param_dim, n_samples) not (n_samples, param_dim)
- Solution: Always check
.shape before computing statistics
Pitfall 2: Missing C++ compiler
- Symptom: Compilation errors when building Stan model
- Cause: PyStan compiles Stan to C++ at runtime
- Solution: Install g++ before attempting to run PyStan code
Pitfall 3: Incorrect num_samples calculation
- Symptom: Different number of posterior samples than expected
- Cause: Not accounting for thinning in calculation
- Solution: Use formula:
num_samples = (iter - warmup) / thin
Pitfall 4: Data type mismatches
- Symptom: Stan compilation or runtime errors about data types
- Cause: NumPy arrays not converted to Python lists
- Solution: Use
.tolist() on numpy arrays in data dictionary
Pitfall 5: Ignoring sampling warnings
- Symptom: Warnings about Cholesky decomposition, divergences, etc.
- Cause: Can indicate model issues or poor sampling
- Solution: While often transient, log warnings and verify results make sense
Verification Strategy
After conversion, verify the following:
-
Sample counts match expectations
expected_samples = (rstan_iter - rstan_warmup) // rstan_thin
assert fit['param'].shape[-1] == expected_samples
-
Parameter dimensions are correct
assert fit['beta'].shape[0] == 3
-
Posterior statistics are reasonable
posterior_mean = fit['param'].mean(axis=-1)
print(f"Posterior mean: {posterior_mean}")
-
Output format matches requirements
- Verify JSON/CSV structure
- Check key names and data types
- Ensure numerical precision is adequate
Minimal Test Pattern
Before full conversion, write a minimal test to understand PyStan's behavior:
import stan
code = """
data { int N; array[N] real y; }
parameters { real mu; real<lower=0> sigma; }
model { y ~ normal(mu, sigma); }
"""
data = {'N': 10, 'y': [1.0]*10}
posterior = stan.build(code, data=data)
fit = posterior.sample(num_chains=1, num_samples=100)
print(f"mu shape: {fit['mu'].shape}")
print(f"sigma shape: {fit['sigma'].shape}")