| name | crypto-market-research-skill |
| description | Market-specific financial research skill for crypto asset and crypto derivatives analysis. Use when Codex needs to parse crypto research, analyze market structure, funding, open interest, liquidity, order-book context, on-chain evidence, macro-liquidity narratives, factor hypotheses, or trade-plan evidence with source-traced reasoning. |
Crypto Market Research Skill
Operating Rule
Keep the market boundary first. Treat report parsing, factor engineering, and philosophical analysis as output modes inside crypto market research, not separate top-level skills.
Preserve source-project capability before optimizing. When adapting a workflow, check references/source-map.md and references/capability-matrix.md so the result remains traceable to pinned upstream snapshots.
Output Modes
Choose one mode explicitly when the user has not specified the expected output:
report_parsing: extract, normalize, and explain content from research notes, protocol reports, market updates, exchange data, news, papers, or datasets.
factor_engineering: turn structured research evidence into factor candidates with evidence, calculation logic, economic hypothesis, and validation status.
philosophical_analysis: apply explicit thinking models to examine assumptions, causality, uncertainty, failure modes, and market narratives.
Workflow
- Identify the research market as crypto and reject A-share assumptions unless the user is comparing markets.
- Select the output mode and load only the relevant reference files.
- Run
scripts/source_doctor.py when live data sources are needed or when prior source health is unknown.
- Gather or inspect source evidence before forming conclusions.
- Run the Source Health Loop: detect failed, stale, partial, or suspicious sources and surface diagnostic events before conclusions.
- Apply the QuantMind Layer pattern: convert raw or semi-structured material into structured research evidence.
- If producing factor work, output factor candidates with the required factor contract.
- If applying thinking models, use progressive disclosure: start with the smallest relevant model subset and expand only when the question requires it.
- State data freshness, source limitations, fallback sources, repair candidates, and validation status.
Factor Candidate Contract
Every factor candidate must include:
factor_name
market
asset_universe
source_evidence
calculation_logic
economic_hypothesis
validation_status
Do not present a candidate factor as a final trading signal without validation evidence.
References
references/source-map.md: pinned upstream source repositories and capability provenance.
references/capability-matrix.md: source parity, market adaptation, and quality upgrade checklist.
references/data-source-policy.md: crypto source categories, fallback rules, and freshness handling.
references/source-health-loop.md: diagnostic events, user warnings, fallback handling, and self-repair candidates for data-source problems.
references/market-structure-policy.md: crypto market-structure evidence requirements.
references/quantmind-layer.md: structured evidence extraction contract inspired by QuantMind.
references/research-output-modes.md: output mode definitions and selection rules.
references/thinking-model-adapter.md: progressive disclosure rules for thinking models.
scripts/source_doctor.py: executable OpenCLI source health checker that emits diagnostic events and repair candidates.