relay-80-100-workflow

name

relay-80-100-workflow

description

Use when writing agent-relay workflows that must fully validate features end-to-end before merging. Covers the 80-to-100 pattern - going beyond "code compiles" to "feature works, tested E2E locally." Includes repair-before-failure validation gates, review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, PGlite for in-memory Postgres testing, mock sandbox patterns, test-fix-rerun loops, verify gates after every edit, and the full lifecycle from implementation through passing tests to commit.

Writing 80-to-100 Validated Workflows

Overview

Most agent workflows get features to ~80%: code written, types check, maybe a build passes. This skill covers the 80-to-100 gap — making workflows that fully validate features end-to-end before committing. The goal: every feature merged via these workflows is tested, verified, and known-working, not just "it compiles."

When to Use

• Writing workflows where the deliverable must be production-ready, not just code-complete
• Features that touch databases, APIs, or infrastructure that can be tested locally
• Any workflow where "it compiles" is not sufficient proof of correctness
• When you want confidence that the commit actually works before deploying

Core Principle: Test In The Workflow

The key insight: run tests as deterministic steps inside the workflow itself. Don't just write test files — execute them, verify they pass, fix failures, and re-run. The workflow doesn't commit until tests are green.

implement → write tests → run tests → fix failures → re-run → build check → regression check → commit

This means the commit at the end of the workflow represents code that is proven working, not just code that an agent wrote and claimed works.

Repair Before Failure

An 80-to-100 workflow should not stop merely because a test, typecheck, lint, schema, or E2E gate turns red. That red output is work for the agent team. Capture it, hand it to a repair owner, fix it, and rerun. Workflow-owned validation gates should never terminate the run with FAILED. If the team exhausts its repair budget or hits an external blocker such as missing credentials, wrong repository, or unsafe dirty worktree, write a BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT artifact and end without committing or opening a PR instead of crashing the workflow.

Use this shape for every meaningful gate:

1. run-*: deterministic command with captureOutput: true and failOnError: false.
2. fix-*: agent step that reads {{steps.run-*.output}}, fixes source/tests/config, and reruns the command locally until green.
3. verify-*: deterministic rerun, usually still failOnError: false, followed by a final repair step if red.
4. commit-if-green: deterministic step that reruns the full acceptance command and commits only when every exit code is zero. If anything is still red, it writes BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT with the failing evidence and exits successfully so the workflow reports a handled blocked state, not a runtime failure.

AgentWorkforce/relay#827 added repair-aware reliability to the SDK (.reliable() / .repairable() and repair-aware retry-mode workflows). Prefer those presets when available, but still model explicit repair owners when gate output needs domain-specific fixing.

Keep Repairable Gates On The Critical Path

Repair-before-failure only works after the workflow reaches a deterministic gate. If a long-running interactive agent step is a hard dependency for the first gate, then a dropped PTY, agent spawn error, or transport failure can stop the workflow before the repair loop ever sees evidence.

For large rollouts, treat implementation agents as advisory producers and put a deterministic reconciliation step on the critical path:

1. Start implementation/review agents in parallel if useful, but require them to write durable artifacts such as .workflow-artifacts/<task>/runtime.md, self-review notes, changed-file lists, and command evidence.
2. Add implementation-reconcile: a deterministic step that inspects git status --short -- <paths>, required files, artifact files, and diff stats. It should use captureOutput: true and failOnError: false.
3. Add repair-implementation-reconcile: a focused repair owner that reads the reconcile output and finishes missing artifacts or code before validation gates run.
4. Make discovery, typecheck, E2E, and final acceptance depend on the reconcile/repair path, not directly on every long-lived implementation agent.
5. Keep the final commit deterministic and green-only; red final evidence becomes a repair/blocking artifact, not a failed workflow.

This shape prevents "agent transport failed" from masquerading as "the product failed." The product still has to pass the same gates; the difference is that the workflow can reach the gates and repair them.

Squad Review Before Final Acceptance

For high-stakes implementation workflows, validation should include human-like review structure, not only command gates. Use small implementation squads and make review state durable:

1. Split independent scopes into 2-3 agent squads. Each squad has an implementer, a shadow reviewer, and optionally a validation/test owner.
2. The shadow reviewer follows the implementer while work is happening and flags spec drift early.
3. Before external review, the implementer writes a self-reflection artifact under .workflow-artifacts/<task>/ covering spec coverage, changed files, tests/proofs, repo-rule alignment, and known risks.
4. A fresh self-review agent reads the actual files, AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md, recent related work, and local conventions. It writes findings to disk.
5. The implementer repairs valid findings, then deterministic gates rerun from captured output.
6. After all squads converge, run the selected review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix path. Light requires review-claude -> fix-loop and gates final review pass on post-fix-validation. Standard adds final-review-claude -> final-fix-claude and gates final review pass on final-fix-claude. Deep requires the standard Claude path plus review-codex -> fix-loop-codex -> final-review-codex -> final-fix-codex and gates final review pass on final-fix-codex.
7. If the selected review path still finds issues, run another explicit fix pass or write BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT with exact evidence.
8. Commit or PR creation is allowed only after the selected review-depth path, final-review-pass gate, final deterministic acceptance, and scoped diff/regression gates are green. Otherwise write a BLOCKED_NO_COMMIT artifact with exact evidence.

This keeps "100%" tied to both executable evidence and independent review over the final state.

The Test-Fix-Rerun Pattern

Every testable feature in a workflow should follow this four-step pattern:

// Step 1: Run tests (allow failure — we expect issues on first run)
.step('run-tests', {
  type: 'deterministic',
  dependsOn: ['create-tests'],
  command: 'npx tsx --test tests/my-feature.test.ts 2>&1 | tail -60',
  captureOutput: true,
  failOnError: false,  // <-- Don't fail the workflow, let the agent fix it
})

// Step 2: Agent reads output, fixes issues, re-runs until green
.step('fix-tests', {
  agent: 'tester',
  dependsOn: ['run-tests'],
  task: `Check the test output and fix any failures.

Test output:
{{steps.run-tests.output}}

If all tests passed, do nothing.
If there are failures:
1. Read the failing test file and source files
2. Fix the issues (could be in test or source)
3. Re-run: npx tsx --test tests/my-feature.test.ts
4. Keep fixing until ALL tests pass.`,
  verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})

// Step 3: Deterministic rerun — capture result for a final repair pass
.step('run-tests-final', {
  type: 'deterministic',
  dependsOn: ['fix-tests'],
  command: 'npx tsx --test tests/my-feature.test.ts 2>&1',
  captureOutput: true,
  failOnError: false,
})

// Step 4: Repair again if the rerun is still red
.step('fix-tests-final', {
  : ,
  : [],
  : ,
  : { :  },
})

Why four steps instead of one?

• The first run captures output for the agent to diagnose
• The agent step can iterate (read errors, fix, re-run) multiple times
• The final deterministic run is still evidence-based, but a repair agent sees it before the workflow stops
• The last repair step keeps the workflow aligned with the agent-team model instead of ending on a fixable failure

PGlite: In-Memory Postgres for Database Testing

When your feature touches the database, use PGlite — a WASM-based Postgres that runs in-process. No Docker, no external services, no flaky network dependencies.

Setup

Install as a dev dependency in the workflow:

.step('install-pglite', {
  type: 'deterministic',
  command: 'npm install --save-dev @electric-sql/pglite 2>&1 | tail -5',
  captureOutput: true,
})

Test Helper Pattern

Create a reusable helper that boots an in-memory Postgres with your schema:

// tests/helpers/pglite-db.ts
import { PGlite } from '@electric-sql/pglite';
import { drizzle } from 'drizzle-orm/pglite';
import * as schema from '../../packages/web/lib/db/schema.js';

// Raw DDL matching your Drizzle schema — PGlite doesn't run Drizzle migrations
const MY_TABLE_DDL = `
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS my_table (
  id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
  name TEXT NOT NULL,
  created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);
`;

export async function createTestDb() {
  const pg = new PGlite();
  await pg.exec(MY_TABLE_DDL);
  const db = drizzle(pg, { schema });
  return { db, pg, schema, cleanup: () => pg.close() };
}

PGlite Gotchas

Issue	Fix
pgcrypto extension not available	Use gen_random_uuid() (built-in since PG 13) or generate UUIDs in app code
UUID columns	PGlite supports UUID natively — no special handling needed
drizzle-orm/pglite import	Exists since drizzle-orm 0.30+. If not found, check version.
Index creation	PGlite supports standard CREATE INDEX — no limitations
Concurrent writes	PGlite is single-connection. Test concurrent logic with sequential assertions.

Test Structure

// tests/my-feature.test.ts
import { describe, it } from 'node:test';
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto';
import { createTestDb } from './helpers/pglite-db.js';

describe('my feature', () => {
  it('does the thing correctly', async () => {
    const { db, schema, cleanup } = await createTestDb();
    try {
      // Arrange
      const testId = randomUUID();
      // Act — use your module against the real (in-memory) Postgres
      // Assert
      assert.equal(result.name, 'expected');
    } finally {
      await cleanup();
    }
  });
});

Verify Gates After Every Edit

Never trust that an agent edited a file correctly. Add a deterministic verify gate after every agent edit step:

// Agent edits a file
.step('edit-schema', {
  agent: 'impl',
  dependsOn: ['read-schema'],
  task: `Edit packages/web/lib/db/schema.ts...`,
  verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})

// Deterministic verification — did the edit actually land?
.step('verify-schema', {
  type: 'deterministic',
  dependsOn: ['edit-schema'],
  command: `if git diff --quiet packages/web/lib/db/schema.ts; then echo "NOT MODIFIED"; exit 1; fi
grep "my_new_table" packages/web/lib/db/schema.ts >/dev/null && echo "OK" || (echo "MISSING"; exit 1)`,
  failOnError: false,
  captureOutput: true,
})
.step('fix-schema-verification', {
  agent: 'impl',
  dependsOn: ['verify-schema'],
  task: `Fix the schema edit if verification failed. Output:\n{{steps.verify-schema.output}}`,
  verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})

What to verify:

• File was actually modified (git diff --quiet returns non-zero)
• Key content exists (grep for table names, function names, imports)
• For new files: file_exists verification type
• For new directories, package trees, generated files, or mixed tracked/untracked edits: use git status --short -- <paths>, because git diff --quiet ignores untracked files

What NOT to verify:

• Exact content (too brittle — agents format differently)
• Line counts or byte sizes (meaningless)

Edit Gates That Include New Files

When an agent may create new files or package directories, do not use git diff --quiet -- <paths> as the only edit gate. It only sees tracked changes, so a valid new package can be misclassified as "no changes."

Use git status --short -- <paths> and keep the first gate repairable:

.step('edit-gate-capture', {
  type: 'deterministic',
  dependsOn: ['implement'],
  command: `if [ -z "$(git status --short -- packages/new-adapter tests docs)" ]; then
  echo "NO_CHANGES"
  exit 1
fi
echo "EDIT_GATE_OK"`,
  captureOutput: true,
  failOnError: false,
})
.step('fix-edit-gate', {
  agent: 'impl',
  dependsOn: ['edit-gate-capture'],
  task: `If the edit gate reported NO_CHANGES, inspect the acceptance contract
and current git status, then add the missing source/test/artifacts.

Gate output:
{{steps.edit-gate-capture.output}}

If it already passed, do nothing.`,
  verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})
.step('edit-gate-final', {
  type: 'deterministic',
  dependsOn: ['fix-edit-gate'],
  command: `if [ -z "$(git status --short -- packages/new-adapter tests docs)" ]; then
  echo "NO_CHANGES"
  exit 1
fi
echo "EDIT_GATE_FINAL_OK"`,
  captureOutput: true,
  failOnError: true,
})

Rule of thumb: git diff --quiet is fine for tracked-only edits to known files. Use git status --short -- <paths> for materialization gates that may include new tests, docs, generated artifacts, or package directories.

Mock Sandbox Pattern

When testing code that interacts with Daytona sandboxes, use inline mock objects matching the existing test conventions:

const daytona = {
  create: async () => ({
    id: 'sandbox-id',
    process: {
      executeCommand: async (cmd, cwd, env) => ({
        result: 'output',
        exitCode: 0,
      }),
    },
    fs: {
      uploadFile: async () => undefined,
    },
    getUserHomeDir: async () => '/home/daytona',
  }),
  remove: async () => undefined,
};

For testing that your code calls the right methods, record calls in an array:

const emitted: EmitEventOptions[] = [];
const mockClient: SessionEventClient = {
  emit: async (opts) => { emitted.push(opts); },
  getEvents: async () => [],
  getLatestSequence: async () => 0,
};

// ... run the code ...

assert.equal(emitted.length, 4);
assert.equal(emitted[0].eventType, 'sandbox_created');

Regression Testing

After your new tests pass, always run the existing test suite to catch regressions:

.step('run-existing-tests', {
  type: 'deterministic',
  dependsOn: ['fix-build'],
  command: 'npm run orchestrator:test 2>&1 | tail -40',
  captureOutput: true,
  failOnError: false,
})

.step('fix-regressions', {
  agent: 'impl',
  dependsOn: ['run-existing-tests'],
  task: `Check the full test suite for regressions caused by our changes.

Test output:
{{steps.run-existing-tests.output}}

If all tests passed, do nothing.
If EXISTING tests broke, read the failing test, find what we broke, fix it.
Most likely cause: constructor signatures changed, new required fields added
without defaults, or import paths shifted.

Run: npm run orchestrator:test
Fix until all tests pass.`,
  verification: { type: 'exit_code' },
})

Full Workflow Template

Here's the complete pattern for a feature that touches the database:

import { workflow } from '@relayflows/core';

const result = await workflow('my-feature')
  .description('Add feature X with full E2E validation')
  .pattern('dag')
  .channel('wf-my-feature')
  .maxConcurrency(3)
  .timeout(3_600_000)
  .repairable()

  .agent('impl', { cli: 'claude', preset: 'worker', retries: 2 })
  .agent('tester', { cli: 'claude', preset: 'worker', retries: 2 })

  // ── Phase 1: Read ────────────────────────────────────────────────
  .step('read-target', {
    type: 'deterministic',
    command: 'cat path/to/file.ts',
    captureOutput: true,
  })

  // ── Phase 2: Implement ───────────────────────────────────────────
  .step('edit-target', {
    agent: 'impl',
    dependsOn: ['read-target'],
    : ,
    : { :  },
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : ,
    : ,
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : { :  },
  })

  
  .(, {
    : ,
    : ,
    : ,
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : { : , :  },
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [, ],
    : ,
    : { : , :  },
  })

  
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : ,
    : ,
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : { :  },
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : ,
    : ,
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : { :  },
  })

  
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : ,
    : ,
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : { :  },
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : ,
    : ,
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : { :  },
  })

  
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : [
      ,
      ,
      ,
      ,
    ].(),
    : ,
    : ,
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : { :  },
  })
  .(, {
    : ,
    : [],
    : ,
    : ,
    : ,
  })

  .(, { : , :  })
  .({ : process.() });

Checklist: Is Your Workflow 80-to-100?

Check	How
Tests exist	file_exists verification on test file
Tests actually run	Deterministic step executes them
Test failures get fixed	Agent step reads output, fixes, re-runs
Final test run is repairable	Deterministic rerun captures output, then a repair owner gets one more pass
Build passes	npx tsc --noEmit deterministic step
No regressions	Existing test suite runs after changes
Every edit is verified and repairable	git diff --quiet + grep for tracked-only edits; git status --short -- <paths> when new files/packages may appear; then a fix step
Commit only happens after green evidence	Final commit step reruns acceptance checks and commits only on zero exit codes

Common Anti-Patterns

Anti-pattern	Why it fails	Fix
Tests written but never executed	Agent claims they pass, they don't	Add deterministic run-tests step
Single failOnError: true test run	First failure kills workflow, no chance to fix	Use repairable run-fix-rerun-final-fix loops
No regression test	New feature works, old features break	Run npm test after build check
Agent asked to "write and run tests" in one step	Agent writes tests, runs them, they fail, it edits, output is garbled	Separate write/run/fix into distinct steps
PGlite DDL doesn't match Drizzle schema	Tests pass on wrong schema	Derive DDL from schema.ts or test with real migration
Final test output not handed to an agent	Broken tests can stop the run or get ignored	Add a final repair owner before commit
Testing only happy path	Edge cases break in prod	Specify edge case tests in the task prompt
No verify gate after agent edits	Agent exits 0 without writing anything	Add git diff --quiet check after every edit, then route failures to a repair step
git diff --quiet for new package/test directories	Untracked files are invisible, so valid new artifacts can look like "no changes"	Use git status --short -- <paths> and a repairable capture → fix → final gate pattern
Committing after failOnError: false without checking exits	Broken work can be committed because the shell step returned successfully	In commit-if-green, record each exit code and skip commit unless all are zero