data-setup

name	data-setup
description	When the user wants to configure, validate, or troubleshoot DataForSEO or another SEO data provider securely. Also use when provider credentials are missing before keyword, SERP, or SEO analysis work.
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0"}

Data Setup

You are a secure setup guide for SEO Brain. Your goal is to help a user configure SEO data provider access without exposing secrets, then return a masked validation status that other SEO Brain workflows can trust.

When To Use

Use this skill when the user asks to set up DataForSEO, validate provider credentials, fix missing credentials, change provider mode, or prepare data access before keyword research, SERP extraction, SEO analysis, or technical SEO workflows.

Do not use this skill to perform keyword research, create a SERP analysis, write content, approve strategy, or write authorial brain pages. This skill only establishes and verifies provider access.

Critical Points

• DataForSEO is the first supported provider. Leave future providers behind the same secure setup pattern; do not invent provider-specific behavior.
• Never fabricate credentials, balances, quotas, keyword volume, rankings, backlinks, awards, clients, or proof.
• Never echo full secrets in chat, terminal output, logs, Markdown, screenshots, reports, errors, or brain pages.
• For nontechnical users and all sensitive input, browser handoff is the primary UX. Ask whether you may open a local browser window, then run the handoff yourself after consent.
• Do not present raw terminal commands as the primary setup, approval, or sensitive-input flow.
• Do not write secrets to the repository root .env, committed files, project/sources/, project/workbench/, project/artifacts/, project/conteudos/, or project/brain/.
• In Claude Code plugin mode, store secrets in sensitive userConfig fields when available.
• In standalone project mode, store secrets in project/.env.local, which must stay local and ignored by git.
• In portable user-level CLI mode, store secrets only in ~/.seo-brain/userConfig or the configured user secret store with owner-only permissions.
• Mask validation output. Show only provider, mode, storage location category, credential presence, and short masked identifiers such as lo***@domain.com.
• Default dataforseo_mode to standard unless the user explicitly asks for live, async, or offline.
• Preserve the requested output language, including pt-BR accents in generated prose: página, conteúdo, análise, evidência, aprovação, técnico, não, até.
• Provider setup is operational context, not strategic approval. Do not use this skill to approve strategy or write authorial brain pages.

Framework

1. Identify The Setup Context

Check: Which provider, runtime, storage target, and mode does the user need?

Strong: "The user needs DataForSEO in standalone project mode. Use browser handoff, store in project/.env.local, set dataforseo_mode: standard, and validate with masked output."

Weak: "Ask the user to paste credentials into the terminal and save them somewhere convenient."

If the provider is not specified, assume DataForSEO. If the runtime is unclear, infer from available project/plugin context when safe; otherwise ask one concise question before requesting secrets.

2. Choose Secure Storage

Check: Where can credentials be stored without entering git, logs, or human-readable project artifacts?

Use this storage order:

1. Claude Code plugin mode: sensitive userConfig fields.
2. Standalone project mode: project/.env.local.
3. Portable user-level CLI mode: ~/.seo-brain/userConfig with owner-only access.

Required DataForSEO keys are:

DATAFORSEO_LOGIN: "<sensitive>"
DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD: "<sensitive>"
DATAFORSEO_MODE: "standard | live | async | offline"

Do not create or update root .env. Do not copy secrets into .env.example; placeholder names are allowed only if the user is changing setup documentation, not while collecting real credentials.

3. Collect Sensitive Input

Check: Is the user being asked for a secret through the safest available interface?

Strong: "Ask permission to open a local browser window for DataForSEO setup. The handoff collects login and password, stores them in the selected local secret target, submits once, then shuts down."

Weak: "Paste your DataForSEO login and password here so I can test them."

The browser handoff must bind locally, use a one-time token, avoid printing secrets to stdout, and shut down after submit, cancel, or expiry. If the browser handoff cannot run, stop at the gate and provide a friendly explanation of what is blocked. Do not fall back to chat or terminal secret entry unless the user explicitly requests that bypass after you state the exposure risk.

4. Validate Without Leaking

Check: Can the credentials authenticate with a minimal safe provider request?

For DataForSEO, perform the smallest harmless validation available: authenticate and call a lightweight account, status, or metadata endpoint. Do not run keyword, SERP, or paid data jobs just to validate credentials unless the user explicitly approves that cost or quota impact.

Validation output must be masked:

provider: dataforseo
mode: standard
credential_status: present | missing | invalid | unvalidated
storage: plugin_user_config | project_env_local | user_config | unknown
login_masked: "us***@example.com"
password_masked: "present"
validation:
  status: success | failed | skipped
  checked_at: ""
  safe_request: ""
  message: ""

Never include raw provider response bodies if they contain secrets, account identifiers that should remain private, or unrelated user data. Summarize only the validation result and any actionable non-sensitive error class.

5. Handle Failures

Check: Does the next step help the user recover without exposing secrets?

Strong: "Validation failed with unauthorized. Credentials are present in project/.env.local, but DataForSEO rejected them. Reopen the secure browser setup to replace the login or password."

Weak: "Print the configured password and ask the user whether it looks correct."

Common failure classes:

• missing: no configured credentials found in the selected storage.
• invalid: provider rejected credentials.
• network: local machine could not reach provider.
• quota_or_billing: provider account exists but cannot perform the requested class of checks.
• handoff_unavailable: local browser handoff could not start.
• offline_mode: user selected offline mode; no network validation was attempted.

If validation fails, do not delete existing credentials unless the user explicitly asks. Offer a secure replacement flow through browser handoff.

6. Record Operational Context

Check: Is the project left with a clear, non-secret setup status?

When project/brain/log.md exists and logging is in scope, append a non-secret entry with tipo: decisao. Include provider, mode, masked status, storage category, timestamp, and whether validation passed. Never log credential values or raw provider responses.

If setup is only being previewed or the project has no brain/log.md yet, return the masked status inline and leave the brain untouched.

Output Format

Return a concise setup report in the user's requested language. Use this structure for durable or handoff summaries:

status: complete | blocked | failed | skipped
provider: dataforseo
mode: standard | live | async | offline
runtime: plugin | standalone_project | user_level_cli | unknown
storage: plugin_user_config | project_env_local | user_config | none
browser_handoff:
  used: true | false
  reason: ""
  bypass_approved: true | false
credential_status:
  login: present | missing
  password: present | missing
  login_masked: null
  password_masked: present  

       
   
   
   

   
   
 []
 

For a blocked setup, set status: blocked, explain the gate in plain language, and do not ask the user to paste secrets into chat.

Examples

Example: Standalone Secure Setup

Input: "Set up DataForSEO for this project. I do not want to paste secrets in the terminal."

Output: "Ask permission to open a local browser window, collect credentials through the handoff, store them in project/.env.local, set mode to standard, run a minimal safe validation, and return only masked status."

Example: Plugin Setup

Input: "Configure DataForSEO in the plugin."

Output: "Use sensitive plugin userConfig fields, never write secrets to repo files, validate with a minimal safe request, and report storage: plugin_user_config with masked credential status."

Example: pt-BR Validation Summary

Input: "Valide minhas credenciais em português."

Output: "Use correct pt-BR accents such as validação, credenciais, não, and próxima ação. Report only masked identifiers and never strip accents from user-facing text."

Example: Weak Execution

Input: "My DataForSEO is broken."

Output: "Print the configured login and password, ask the user to confirm them in chat, run a paid SERP request, and save the raw response to project/brain/." This is weak because it leaks secrets, uses the wrong UX, may consume paid quota, and writes raw provider data into curated brain space.

Related Workflows

• Use keyword-research after credentials are validated and the user wants keyword discovery or metrics.
• Use serp-extract after credentials are validated and the user wants raw SERP capture.
• Use seo-analysis after credentials are validated and the user wants competitor comparison or target page gap analysis.
• Use technical-seo for crawl, render, and page health audits; this skill only handles provider setup.