agent-harness

name

agent-harness

description

Turn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust, and refuse to close until everything is verified or explicitly waived. Use when you want an agent or subagent to pick up a goal and drive it to a verified close across one of this repo's 18 domains ('run this goal through the engineering harness', 'set up an agentic loop for marketing work', 'make the finance domain self-verifying'). NOT for authoring Claude Code Workflow-tool .js scripts (workflow-builder), N-agent tournaments on one task (agenthub), single-file metric optimization (autoresearch-agent), or discovering published loop recipes (loop-library).

Agent Harness

You are a harness operator, not a hero. The loop — not your optimism — decides when work is done. Your job: compile the goal into tasks with checks, execute one task at a time, let the controller adjudicate verification, and stop when the state machine says stop.

The contract

GOAL → goal_compiler → PLAN → loop_controller: [execute → verify]* → CLOSE
                                     ↑______retry (≤ max_attempts, changed approach)
                                     └── ESCALATE on exhausted budgets — never fake success

Three layers, all JSON: a committed per-domain manifest (what skills/tools/checks exist), a per-goal plan (which tasks, which verifications, what "done" means), and a per-run state file (the single source of truth; a fresh session resumes from it alone).

Quick start

# 0. Pick the domain manifest (18 committed under assets/harnesses/, e.g. engineering-team.json)
ls assets/harnesses/

# 1. Compile the goal (refuses vague goals with exit 3 + forcing questions)
python3 scripts/goal_compiler.py \
  --goal "audit the payments service and design an SLO with an error budget" \
  --manifest assets/harnesses/engineering.json --out plan.json

# 2. Initialize the loop state
python3 scripts/loop_controller.py init --plan plan.json --state .agent-harness/state.json

# 3. Drive the loop — repeat until directive is "close" or "escalate"
python3 scripts/loop_controller.py next --state .agent-harness/state.json
#    → {"action": "execute", "task": "T1", ...}: open the task's skill (SKILL.md at
#      skill_path), do the work with its tools, then:
python3 scripts/loop_controller.py record --state .agent-harness/state.json \
  --task T1 --phase execute --exit-code 0
#    → the controller runs the task's checks ITSELF (subprocess, timeout, evidence log):
python3 scripts/loop_controller.py verify --state .agent-harness/state.json --task T1 --cwd <repo-root>

# 4. Close — refused (exit 4) while any task is unverified and unwaived
python3 scripts/loop_controller.py close --state .agent-harness/state.json

Regenerate a manifest after skills change (diff-stable, CI-checkable):

python3 scripts/harness_manifest_builder.py --domain engineering-team \
  --repo-root <repo-root> --out-dir assets/harnesses --no-timestamp

Hard rules

1. Never adjudicate your own verification. verify runs the checks via subprocess; a passing record --phase verify without --evidence is rejected (exit 6). You do not get to declare a task verified.
2. Never modify a gate you are judged by. Check commands come from the manifest/plan. Editing a check to make it pass is the reward-hacking failure mode (see references/verification_discipline.md) — same invariant as autoresearch-agent's locked evaluator.
3. One task at a time, writes serialized. Parallelize reading and judging, never two tasks writing the same artifact (references/agentic_loop_canon.md).
4. Retry means a changed approach. Same command + same input = same failure. The retry directive says so; honor it.
5. Budgets are terminal states, not suggestions. max_attempts_per_task → escalated (exit 2); max_loop_iterations → escalate (exit 5). Exhausted budgets are never reported as success — a human waives (close --waive T3 --reason "..."), you don't.
6. Fresh context beats long context. Every next directive is executable by a new session reading only the plan + state files. Long-running goals: run each iteration as its own session against the durable state.
7. State lives in .agent-harness/ — never in .agenthub/, .autoresearch/, or docs/TC/ (those belong to sibling skills).
8. Plan and state files are a trust boundary. verify shell-executes each task's check command; only run the harness on plan/state files you or goal_compiler.py produced, never on files from untrusted input (see references/verification_discipline.md).

Forcing questions (ask before compiling; one per turn, with a recommended answer)

#	Question	Recommended answer	Why (canon)
1	What single observable outcome means DONE?	A named artifact + a command that exits 0 against it	Verifier's law: invest in verifiability first
2	Which domain harness applies?	The domain whose skills name the deliverable; if two, run two sequential loops	Orchestrator-workers: scoped objectives beat mega-goals
3	What must NOT change?	List no-touch paths; put them in the goal text so the compiler's plan inherits them	Boundaries are part of a subagent spec
4	Who reviews escalations, and how fast?	A named human; escalations block the loop by design	Approval-required is a terminal state, not a nuisance
5	What is the iteration budget?	Default 12 loop iterations / 3 attempts per task; raise only with a reason	Caps are runtime errors, not advice (OpenAI SDK max_turns)

Exit codes (branch on these mechanically)

Code	Tool	Meaning
0	all	OK / directive emitted
2	loop_controller	Escalation required — a human must review the evidence log
3	goal_compiler	Goal too vague — answer the forcing questions, recompile
4	goal_compiler / loop_controller	No skill matched / close refused (unverified tasks)
5	loop_controller	Global iteration cap reached
6	loop_controller	Invalid transition (recording on verified task, evidence missing, unknown task)

Verifiable success

• python3 scripts/harness_manifest_builder.py --sample, scripts/goal_compiler.py --sample, and scripts/loop_controller.py --sample all exit 0.
• A vague goal (--goal "make it better") exits 3 and prints forcing questions.
• loop_controller.py close on a state with an unverified task exits 4.
• The demo loop in loop_controller.py --sample shows a verify failure consuming an attempt and the loop still closing only after a passing verify with evidence.

Related skills

• workflow-builder: authoring deterministic .js scripts for Claude Code's Workflow tool. NOT for goal-to-close loop state (this skill).
• agenthub: N parallel agents competing on ONE task in git worktrees. Use it inside a harness task that wants competing attempts.
• autoresearch-agent: metric optimization of a single file against a locked evaluator. Use it when a task's done_when is "metric improves".
• tc-tracker: per-code-change lifecycle records. Use for change bookkeeping; the harness state file is per-goal, not per-change.
• loop-library: discover/audit published loop recipes conversationally. This skill is the executable enforcement of that vocabulary.
• ship-gate / self-eval / spec-driven-workflow: plug in as close-time checks inside a task's verification[].

See references/domain_harness_design.md for the three-layer architecture, the reuse map, and how to raise a domain's harness quality.