Manage network incident response workflows in Cisco WebEx - incident spaces, status updates, escalation, resolution tracking, and post-incident review coordination. Use when declaring a network incident, coordinating outage response in WebEx, tracking incident status, or running a post-incident review.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
Manage network incident response workflows in Cisco WebEx - incident spaces, status updates, escalation, resolution tracking, and post-incident review coordination. Use when declaring a network incident, coordinating outage response in WebEx, tracking incident status, or running a post-incident review.
license
Apache-2.0
user-invocable
true
metadata
{"openclaw":{"requires":{"bins":"[Truncated]"}}}
WebEx Incident Workflow
WebEx API Capabilities Used
API
Purpose
Messages -- Create
Post incident updates to spaces
Messages -- Create (Adaptive Card)
Rich incident declaration and status cards
Rooms -- Create
Create dedicated incident spaces
Rooms -- Get Details
Check space metadata
Memberships -- Create
Add responders to incident spaces
Memberships -- List
Identify who is in the incident space
People -- List
Look up engineers by name/email for escalation
People -- Get Details
Check engineer availability
Webhooks
Receive Adaptive Card action submissions (IC claim, status updates)
Incident Lifecycle in WebEx
Phase 1: Detection & Declaration
When a critical alert triggers (from webex-network-alerts skill or human report), post an Adaptive Card to the primary alerts space:
{"type":"AdaptiveCard","version":"1.3","body":[{"type":"Container","style":"attention","items":[{"type":"TextBlock","text":"INCIDENT DECLARED -- Network Outage","weight":"Bolder","size":"Large","color":"Attention"}]},{"type":"FactSet","facts":[{"title":"Severity:","value":"P1 -- Service Impacting"},{"title":"Detected:","value":"2024-02-21 14:32 UTC"},{"title":"Reporter:","value":"NetClaw (automated)"}]},{"type":"TextBlock","text":"**Symptoms:**\n- R1 unreachable (ping 0%)\n- 47 downstream routes lost\n- 3 OSPF adjacencies down\n- BGP peer to ISP: IDLE","wrap":true},{"type":"TextBlock","text":"**Impact:**\n- Site A has no WAN connectivity\n- Estimated affected users: ~200","wrap":true},{"type":"FactSet","facts":[{"title":"Incident Commander:","value":"Awaiting claim"},{"title":"ServiceNow:","value":"CR/INC pending"}]},{"type":"ActionSet","actions":[{"type":"Action.Submit","title":"Claim IC Role","data":{"action":"claim_ic","incident_id":"INC-001"}}]}]}
Optionally create a dedicated incident space for P1 events:
Add the NOC team, on-call engineers, and management as members via the Memberships API.
Phase 2: Triage & Assignment
When an engineer clicks "Claim IC Role" on the Adaptive Card (received via webhook):
**Incident Team Formed**
**IC:** John Smith (claimed at 14:35 UTC)
**NetClaw:** Automated investigation assistant
**Triage Checklist:**
- [x] Alert generated and posted
- [x] Incident declared (P1)
- [x] IC assigned -- John Smith
- [ ] ServiceNow incident created
- [ ] Upstream device checked
- [ ] Blast radius confirmed
- [ ] Customer communication sent
_NetClaw beginning automated investigation..._
Phase 3: Automated Investigation
NetClaw runs diagnostics and posts results as threaded replies:
**Automated Investigation -- Step 1/4**
_Checking upstream device R2 for connectivity to R1..._
Post each step result:
**Investigation Results -- Step 1/4**
**Ping from R2 to R1 (10.1.1.1):** 0% success -- R1 unreachable from upstream
**Investigation Results -- Step 2/4**
**R2 interface Gi1 (toward R1):** up/up, 0 CRC errors, last input 4 min ago
> Physical layer looks OK from R2 side
**Investigation Results -- Step 3/4**
**R2 OSPF neighbors:** R1 missing from neighbor table (was FULL)
> OSPF adjacency lost, DR election may be in progress
**Investigation Results -- Step 4/4**
**R2 logs (last 30 min):**
14:31:47: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Nbr 1.1.1.1 on Gi1 from FULL to DOWN
14:31:48: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Gi1, changed to down
14:32:01: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Gi1, changed to up
14:32:15: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Nbr 1.1.1.1 on Gi1 from DOWN to INIT
**Analysis:** R2 saw Gi1 flap at 14:31. Line protocol came back up but OSPF hasn't re-converged. Likely physical issue on R1 side causing interface bounce.
Phase 4: Status Updates
Post periodic status updates as Adaptive Cards:
{"type":"AdaptiveCard","version":"1.3","body":[{"type":"TextBlock","text":"Status Update -- 14:50 UTC (18 min elapsed)","weight":"Bolder","size":"Medium"},{"type":"FactSet","facts":[{"title":"Status:","value":"Investigating"},{"title":"Finding:","value":"R1 appears to have reloaded unexpectedly. R2 sees the link recover but R1 is not responding to OSPF hellos yet."},{"title":"Next Step:","value":"Waiting for R1 to complete boot sequence. Checking console access."},{"title":"ETA:","value":"Unknown -- dependent on R1 recovery"}]},{"type":"TextBlock","text":"_ServiceNow INC0012345 updated_","isSubtle":true}]}
Phase 5: Resolution
{"type":"AdaptiveCard","version":"1.3","body":[{"type":"Container","style":"good","items":[{"type":"TextBlock","text":"INCIDENT RESOLVED","weight":"Bolder","size":"Large","color":"Good"}]},{"type":"FactSet","facts":[{"title":"Duration:","value":"34 minutes (14:32 -- 15:06 UTC)"},{"title":"Resolution:","value":"R1 experienced a software crash. Device auto-reloaded and recovered. All OSPF adjacencies re-established. Full routing restored."},{"title":"Root Cause:","value":"Software crash -- Traceback found in logs indicating bug CSCxx12345. TAC case recommended."}]},{"type":"TextBlock","text":"**Post-Resolution Verification:**\n- R1 reachable: 100% ping success\n- OSPF neighbors: 3/3 FULL\n- BGP peer: Established\n- Route count: 47 routes (matches baseline)\n- Connectivity: 100% to all targets","wrap":true},{"type":"TextBlock","text":"_ServiceNow INC0012345 resolved | GAIT session abc123 closed_","isSubtle":true}]}
Phase 6: Post-Incident Review
**Post-Incident Review -- Scheduled**
**Incident:** Network Outage -- R1 crash
**Date:** 2024-02-22 10:00 UTC
**Space:** This thread
**Review Artifacts (attached):**
1. Timeline of events
2. R1 show logging output
3. R1 show version (confirms reload reason)
4. GAIT audit trail (full session)
5. Pre/post health check comparison
**Discussion Topics:**
- Was detection fast enough?
- Was automated investigation helpful?
- What monitoring gaps exist?
- Should R1 be upgraded to patched version?
- Do we need redundant path for this link?
Escalation Matrix
Severity
Notify
Escalate After
Space
P1
IC + Manager + NOC
15 min
Dedicated incident space
P2
IC + Team
30 min
NetClaw Alerts
P3
Assigned engineer
4 hours
NetClaw Alerts
P4
Queue only
Next business day
NetClaw General
Before escalating, check the engineer's WebEx presence/status:
If engineer appears Away or in DND, escalate to next person in rotation
Never suppress P1 escalation regardless of status
Adaptive Card Actions for Incident Management
Use Action.Submit buttons on Adaptive Cards for interactive incident management:
Button
Action Data
Purpose
Claim IC Role
{"action":"claim_ic"}
Engineer takes ownership
Update Status
{"action":"update_status"}
Post a new status update
Mark Resolved
{"action":"resolve"}
Close the incident
Schedule PIR
{"action":"schedule_pir"}
Set up post-incident review
These actions are received via WebEx Webhooks (attachmentActions resource) and processed by NetClaw to update the incident state.
ServiceNow Integration
Create ServiceNow incident at Phase 1:
python3 $MCP_CALL"python3 -u $SERVICENOW_MCP_SCRIPT" create_incident \
'{"short_description":"P1 - R1 unreachable, WAN outage Site A","description":"R1 is unreachable. 47 routes lost, 3 OSPF adjacencies down. Impact: ~200 users at Site A without WAN connectivity.","urgency":"1","impact":"1","category":"Network"}'
Update ServiceNow as incident progresses and close on resolution.